lastID = -278017
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: How short should the SRT be? – Investigation of parallel vs series C- and...
How short should the SRT be? – Investigation of parallel vs series C- and N-removal processes at the Blue Plains AWTP
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-02-23 14:12:42 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 23:56:45 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 23:56:44 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: How short should the SRT be? – Investigation of parallel vs series C- and...
How short should the SRT be? – Investigation of parallel vs series C- and N-removal processes at the Blue Plains AWTP

How short should the SRT be? – Investigation of parallel vs series C- and N-removal processes at the Blue Plains AWTP

How short should the SRT be? – Investigation of parallel vs series C- and N-removal processes at the Blue Plains AWTP

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: How short should the SRT be? – Investigation of parallel vs series C- and...
How short should the SRT be? – Investigation of parallel vs series C- and N-removal processes at the Blue Plains AWTP
Abstract
There are well acknowledged benefits from up-stream high-rate C- and consecutive N-removal processes with reduced volume- and aeration requirements. At large 2-stage plants like Blue Plains AWTP, the 2nd dimension of having parallel trains opens up the opportunity to shift loads from one high-rate activated sludge (HRAS) train to the other. The load shift promotes biosorption on the relatively higly-loaded side and allows for achieving minimum sludge retention time (SRT) required for nitrification on the relatively lightly-loaded side by utilizing bioaugmentation from the N-removal stage. A full-plant model has been calibrated to operational data before and after start-up of the new anaerobic digestion system. Then 2 future optimization scenarios for resource recovery have been evaluated predicting 18% in methanol reduction and 6% in biogas increase.
There are well acknowledged benefits from up-stream high-rate C- and consecutive N-removal processes with reduced volume- and aeration requirements. At large 2-stage plants like Blue Plains AWTP, the 2nd dimension of having parallel trains opens up the opportunity to shift loads from one high-rate activated sludge (HRAS) train to the other. The load shift promotes biosorption on the...
Author(s)
B WettA Al-OmariG BowdenB StinsonN SzilágyiI TakacsJ JimenezH DeClippeleirC DeBarbadilloS MurthyW Bailey
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectResearch Article
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep, 2015
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864715819540036
Volume / Issue2015 / 16
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2015
Word count145

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'How short should the SRT be? – Investigation of parallel vs series C- and N-removal processes at the Blue Plains AWTP'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: How short should the SRT be? – Investigation of parallel vs series C- and...
How short should the SRT be? – Investigation of parallel vs series C- and N-removal processes at the Blue Plains AWTP
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-278017
Get access
-278017
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'How short should the SRT be? – Investigation of parallel vs series C- and N-removal processes at the Blue Plains AWTP'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: How short should the SRT be? – Investigation of parallel vs series C- and...
How short should the SRT be? – Investigation of parallel vs series C- and N-removal processes at the Blue Plains AWTP
Abstract
There are well acknowledged benefits from up-stream high-rate C- and consecutive N-removal processes with reduced volume- and aeration requirements. At large 2-stage plants like Blue Plains AWTP, the 2nd dimension of having parallel trains opens up the opportunity to shift loads from one high-rate activated sludge (HRAS) train to the other. The load shift promotes biosorption on the relatively higly-loaded side and allows for achieving minimum sludge retention time (SRT) required for nitrification on the relatively lightly-loaded side by utilizing bioaugmentation from the N-removal stage. A full-plant model has been calibrated to operational data before and after start-up of the new anaerobic digestion system. Then 2 future optimization scenarios for resource recovery have been evaluated predicting 18% in methanol reduction and 6% in biogas increase.
There are well acknowledged benefits from up-stream high-rate C- and consecutive N-removal processes with reduced volume- and aeration requirements. At large 2-stage plants like Blue Plains AWTP, the 2nd dimension of having parallel trains opens up the opportunity to shift loads from one high-rate activated sludge (HRAS) train to the other. The load shift promotes biosorption on the...
Author(s)
B WettA Al-OmariG BowdenB StinsonN SzilágyiI TakacsJ JimenezH DeClippeleirC DeBarbadilloS MurthyW Bailey
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectResearch Article
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep, 2015
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864715819540036
Volume / Issue2015 / 16
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2015
Word count145

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
B Wett# A Al-Omari# G Bowden# B Stinson# N Szilágyi# I Takacs# J Jimenez# H DeClippeleir# C DeBarbadillo# S Murthy# W Bailey. How short should the SRT be? – Investigation of parallel vs series C- and N-removal processes at the Blue Plains AWTP. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 9 May. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-278017CITANCHOR>.
B Wett# A Al-Omari# G Bowden# B Stinson# N Szilágyi# I Takacs# J Jimenez# H DeClippeleir# C DeBarbadillo# S Murthy# W Bailey. How short should the SRT be? – Investigation of parallel vs series C- and N-removal processes at the Blue Plains AWTP. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed May 9, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-278017CITANCHOR.
B Wett# A Al-Omari# G Bowden# B Stinson# N Szilágyi# I Takacs# J Jimenez# H DeClippeleir# C DeBarbadillo# S Murthy# W Bailey
How short should the SRT be? – Investigation of parallel vs series C- and N-removal processes at the Blue Plains AWTP
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
May 9, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-278017CITANCHOR