lastID = -288884
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
TO PUMP OR NOT TO PUMP…THE “OTHER” BYPASS ALTERNATIVE
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 11:32:24 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-06 11:32:23 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 05:42:19 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 05:42:18 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
TO PUMP OR NOT TO PUMP…THE “OTHER” BYPASS ALTERNATIVE

TO PUMP OR NOT TO PUMP…THE “OTHER” BYPASS ALTERNATIVE

TO PUMP OR NOT TO PUMP…THE “OTHER” BYPASS ALTERNATIVE

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
TO PUMP OR NOT TO PUMP…THE “OTHER” BYPASS ALTERNATIVE
Abstract
As the knowledge and use of trenchless technologies advance, the applications have become more diverse. With this diversity has come the introduction of supplementary considerations, including complex bypass pumping schemes, site restoration issues, and site ingress and egress. Many times, what appears to be a simple trenchless project turns into a complex exercise involving issues other than the actual rehabilitation itself.This paper provides a review of an emergency project that included the cured-in-place lining of approximately 1,200 linear feet of 30- and 36-inch interceptor sewer, and the unique implementation of a 30-MGD bypass pumping system. While the lining component involved relatively standard design and construction procedures, the bypasspumping component presented several complex issues, making this project less than ordinary. Upon construction, a bypass-pumping alternative, that did not include any pumps, was selected.The emergency project was initiated when a collapse occurred in a 30-inch gravity reinforced concrete interceptor, immediately downstream from a force main terminal structure. The interceptor is approximately 36-years old and is located in a mature, established residential area. An additional collapse had occurred down-stream from this location ten years prior. Based on the condition and location of the interceptor, the County needed to implement a quick, non-disruptive, and long-term solution. While the cured-in-place lining option provided resolution of each of these concerns, the 30 MGD bypass system required significant ingenuity to achieve these goals. Issues that needed to be addressed for the bypass system included: staging area; size, number, and location of the bypass lines and pumps; noise control; protection of existing force main and interceptor; method of installation for suction and discharge operations; coordination with pump station operations; protection of up- and down-stream structures; power requirements; and system maintenance. The original emergency design included the installation of approximately ten 12-inch pumpsets and two to three 18-inch bypass lines. However, upon receipt of the bids and further inspection of the collection system operations, it was determined that the bypass could be achieved by using the County pump stations/force main to pump through the bypass piping system; thus eliminating the need for temporary pumpsets.
As the knowledge and use of trenchless technologies advance, the applications have become more diverse. With this diversity has come the introduction of supplementary considerations, including complex bypass pumping schemes, site restoration issues, and site ingress and egress. Many times, what appears to be a simple trenchless project turns into a complex exercise involving issues other than the...
Author(s)
Tracy K. FeePedro Ramirez
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 47 - Collection Systems Symposium: Can We Build It? Yes We Can!
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2002
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20020101)2002:13L.523;1-
DOI10.2175/193864702784162976
Volume / Issue2002 / 13
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)523 - 533
Copyright2002
Word count354

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'TO PUMP OR NOT TO PUMP…THE “OTHER” BYPASS ALTERNATIVE'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
TO PUMP OR NOT TO PUMP…THE “OTHER” BYPASS ALTERNATIVE
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-288884
Get access
-288884
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'TO PUMP OR NOT TO PUMP…THE “OTHER” BYPASS ALTERNATIVE'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
TO PUMP OR NOT TO PUMP…THE “OTHER” BYPASS ALTERNATIVE
Abstract
As the knowledge and use of trenchless technologies advance, the applications have become more diverse. With this diversity has come the introduction of supplementary considerations, including complex bypass pumping schemes, site restoration issues, and site ingress and egress. Many times, what appears to be a simple trenchless project turns into a complex exercise involving issues other than the actual rehabilitation itself.This paper provides a review of an emergency project that included the cured-in-place lining of approximately 1,200 linear feet of 30- and 36-inch interceptor sewer, and the unique implementation of a 30-MGD bypass pumping system. While the lining component involved relatively standard design and construction procedures, the bypasspumping component presented several complex issues, making this project less than ordinary. Upon construction, a bypass-pumping alternative, that did not include any pumps, was selected.The emergency project was initiated when a collapse occurred in a 30-inch gravity reinforced concrete interceptor, immediately downstream from a force main terminal structure. The interceptor is approximately 36-years old and is located in a mature, established residential area. An additional collapse had occurred down-stream from this location ten years prior. Based on the condition and location of the interceptor, the County needed to implement a quick, non-disruptive, and long-term solution. While the cured-in-place lining option provided resolution of each of these concerns, the 30 MGD bypass system required significant ingenuity to achieve these goals. Issues that needed to be addressed for the bypass system included: staging area; size, number, and location of the bypass lines and pumps; noise control; protection of existing force main and interceptor; method of installation for suction and discharge operations; coordination with pump station operations; protection of up- and down-stream structures; power requirements; and system maintenance. The original emergency design included the installation of approximately ten 12-inch pumpsets and two to three 18-inch bypass lines. However, upon receipt of the bids and further inspection of the collection system operations, it was determined that the bypass could be achieved by using the County pump stations/force main to pump through the bypass piping system; thus eliminating the need for temporary pumpsets.
As the knowledge and use of trenchless technologies advance, the applications have become more diverse. With this diversity has come the introduction of supplementary considerations, including complex bypass pumping schemes, site restoration issues, and site ingress and egress. Many times, what appears to be a simple trenchless project turns into a complex exercise involving issues other than the...
Author(s)
Tracy K. FeePedro Ramirez
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 47 - Collection Systems Symposium: Can We Build It? Yes We Can!
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2002
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20020101)2002:13L.523;1-
DOI10.2175/193864702784162976
Volume / Issue2002 / 13
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)523 - 533
Copyright2002
Word count354

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2026 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Tracy K. Fee# Pedro Ramirez. TO PUMP OR NOT TO PUMP…THE “OTHER” BYPASS ALTERNATIVE. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 1 Apr. 2026. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-288884CITANCHOR>.
Tracy K. Fee# Pedro Ramirez. TO PUMP OR NOT TO PUMP…THE “OTHER” BYPASS ALTERNATIVE. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed April 1, 2026. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-288884CITANCHOR.
Tracy K. Fee# Pedro Ramirez
TO PUMP OR NOT TO PUMP…THE “OTHER” BYPASS ALTERNATIVE
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
April 1, 2026
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-288884CITANCHOR