lastID = -289036
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Merits of Alternative MBR Systems
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 11:23:39 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-06 11:23:38 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 01:26:53 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 01:26:52 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 01:26:51 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Merits of Alternative MBR Systems

Merits of Alternative MBR Systems

Merits of Alternative MBR Systems

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Merits of Alternative MBR Systems
Abstract
Two membrane bioreactor (MBR) systems were evaluated. Both MBR systems are able to meet Arizona Class A+ reuse requirements. The Zenon configuration has a total maximum air requirement of approximately 11,000 scfm. This assumes coarse bubblers in the membrane tank, and fine pore diffusers in the aeration tank. Since the MLSS will be approximately 10,000 mg/l, the alpha for fine pore aeration will be about 0.42 and for the coarse bubblers 0.62.The Kubota configuration has a maximum air requirement of approximately 23,000 scfm, using coarse bubble spargers. This is assumed to be on a constant basis to provide an average D.O. concentration of 1.5 mg/l. If the Kubota system is operated at the recommended MLSS concentration of not less than 12,500 mg/l, sufficient air to meet the process demand could not be introduced given the existing tankage. Part of the anoxic tankage would need to be aerated to make up the deficit.One possibility for the Kubota alternative is to adopt their two-tier approach whereby cassettes are stacked one on top of the other. By this means, approximately half of the membrane tank could be freed up for fine pore aeration. However, this alternative lacks experience at the scale of the Randolph Park WRF.There are still considerable unknowns regarding performance of MBR systems. Therefore, close monitoring of the operation, as well as off-gas testing of the aeration system operating at the higher MLSS concentrations is recommended.
Two membrane bioreactor (MBR) systems were evaluated. Both MBR systems are able to meet Arizona Class A+ reuse requirements. The Zenon configuration has a total maximum air requirement of approximately 11,000 scfm. This assumes coarse bubblers in the membrane tank, and fine pore diffusers in the aeration tank. Since the MLSS will be approximately 10,000 mg/l, the alpha for fine pore aeration will...
Author(s)
John R. BratbyByron GainesMelodee LoyerFrank LuizDenny Parker
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 11 - Water Reclamation and Reuse: Membranes and Technology
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2002
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20020101)2002:16L.1;1-
DOI10.2175/193864702784246801
Volume / Issue2002 / 16
First / last page(s)1 - 17
Copyright2002
Word count240

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Merits of Alternative MBR Systems'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Merits of Alternative MBR Systems
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-289036
Get access
-289036
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Merits of Alternative MBR Systems'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Merits of Alternative MBR Systems
Abstract
Two membrane bioreactor (MBR) systems were evaluated. Both MBR systems are able to meet Arizona Class A+ reuse requirements. The Zenon configuration has a total maximum air requirement of approximately 11,000 scfm. This assumes coarse bubblers in the membrane tank, and fine pore diffusers in the aeration tank. Since the MLSS will be approximately 10,000 mg/l, the alpha for fine pore aeration will be about 0.42 and for the coarse bubblers 0.62.The Kubota configuration has a maximum air requirement of approximately 23,000 scfm, using coarse bubble spargers. This is assumed to be on a constant basis to provide an average D.O. concentration of 1.5 mg/l. If the Kubota system is operated at the recommended MLSS concentration of not less than 12,500 mg/l, sufficient air to meet the process demand could not be introduced given the existing tankage. Part of the anoxic tankage would need to be aerated to make up the deficit.One possibility for the Kubota alternative is to adopt their two-tier approach whereby cassettes are stacked one on top of the other. By this means, approximately half of the membrane tank could be freed up for fine pore aeration. However, this alternative lacks experience at the scale of the Randolph Park WRF.There are still considerable unknowns regarding performance of MBR systems. Therefore, close monitoring of the operation, as well as off-gas testing of the aeration system operating at the higher MLSS concentrations is recommended.
Two membrane bioreactor (MBR) systems were evaluated. Both MBR systems are able to meet Arizona Class A+ reuse requirements. The Zenon configuration has a total maximum air requirement of approximately 11,000 scfm. This assumes coarse bubblers in the membrane tank, and fine pore diffusers in the aeration tank. Since the MLSS will be approximately 10,000 mg/l, the alpha for fine pore aeration will...
Author(s)
John R. BratbyByron GainesMelodee LoyerFrank LuizDenny Parker
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 11 - Water Reclamation and Reuse: Membranes and Technology
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2002
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20020101)2002:16L.1;1-
DOI10.2175/193864702784246801
Volume / Issue2002 / 16
First / last page(s)1 - 17
Copyright2002
Word count240

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2026 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
John R. Bratby# Byron Gaines# Melodee Loyer# Frank Luiz# Denny Parker. Merits of Alternative MBR Systems. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 1 Apr. 2026. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-289036CITANCHOR>.
John R. Bratby# Byron Gaines# Melodee Loyer# Frank Luiz# Denny Parker. Merits of Alternative MBR Systems. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed April 1, 2026. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-289036CITANCHOR.
John R. Bratby# Byron Gaines# Melodee Loyer# Frank Luiz# Denny Parker
Merits of Alternative MBR Systems
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
April 1, 2026
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-289036CITANCHOR