lastID = -289255
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
CONSIDERATIONS IN SELECTING AN APPROACH TO ASSESSING WETLAND FUNCTION
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 16:52:39 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-06 16:52:38 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 02:49:40 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 02:49:38 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 21:20:05 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:20:04 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
CONSIDERATIONS IN SELECTING AN APPROACH TO ASSESSING WETLAND FUNCTION

CONSIDERATIONS IN SELECTING AN APPROACH TO ASSESSING WETLAND FUNCTION

CONSIDERATIONS IN SELECTING AN APPROACH TO ASSESSING WETLAND FUNCTION

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
CONSIDERATIONS IN SELECTING AN APPROACH TO ASSESSING WETLAND FUNCTION
Abstract
Many approaches and specific procedures have been developed to assess wetland function for regulatory, planning, management, and education purposes. General approaches include descriptive narratives based on best professional judgment, application of classification systems (e.g., USFWS classification), sampling of specific structural or functional criteria (e.g., bird survey), and the application of wetland assessment procedures (e.g., Habitat Evaluation Procedure, Hydrogeomorphic Approach, and Index of Biological Integrity). The task of identifying the best approach can be difficult depending upon the complexity of the study and whether there are multiple objectives. This paper identifies the various considerations in choosing an approach and outlines steps to selecting a wetland assessment procedure. This process is illustrated with an example of a large scale project, involving the assessment of several existing wetland areas and proposed wetland restoration. The example demonstrates that in many cases no one procedure can meet all study objectives. It is recommended that the overall objectives be clearly stated at the beginning and that a variety of procedures be considered. Several approaches, including a combination of models from different procedures, may be needed to meet all objectives throughout the different stages of study.
Many approaches and specific procedures have been developed to assess wetland function for regulatory, planning, management, and education purposes. General approaches include descriptive narratives based on best professional judgment, application of classification systems (e.g., USFWS classification), sampling of specific structural or functional criteria (e.g., bird survey), and the application...
Author(s)
Candy C. Bartoldus
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 21: Hudson-Raritan Estuary
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2002
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20020101)2002:2L.2024;1-
DOI10.2175/193864702785664789
Volume / Issue2002 / 2
Content sourceWatershed Conference
First / last page(s)2024 - 2037
Copyright2002
Word count198

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'CONSIDERATIONS IN SELECTING AN APPROACH TO ASSESSING WETLAND FUNCTION'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
CONSIDERATIONS IN SELECTING AN APPROACH TO ASSESSING WETLAND FUNCTION
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-289255
Get access
-289255
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'CONSIDERATIONS IN SELECTING AN APPROACH TO ASSESSING WETLAND FUNCTION'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
CONSIDERATIONS IN SELECTING AN APPROACH TO ASSESSING WETLAND FUNCTION
Abstract
Many approaches and specific procedures have been developed to assess wetland function for regulatory, planning, management, and education purposes. General approaches include descriptive narratives based on best professional judgment, application of classification systems (e.g., USFWS classification), sampling of specific structural or functional criteria (e.g., bird survey), and the application of wetland assessment procedures (e.g., Habitat Evaluation Procedure, Hydrogeomorphic Approach, and Index of Biological Integrity). The task of identifying the best approach can be difficult depending upon the complexity of the study and whether there are multiple objectives. This paper identifies the various considerations in choosing an approach and outlines steps to selecting a wetland assessment procedure. This process is illustrated with an example of a large scale project, involving the assessment of several existing wetland areas and proposed wetland restoration. The example demonstrates that in many cases no one procedure can meet all study objectives. It is recommended that the overall objectives be clearly stated at the beginning and that a variety of procedures be considered. Several approaches, including a combination of models from different procedures, may be needed to meet all objectives throughout the different stages of study.
Many approaches and specific procedures have been developed to assess wetland function for regulatory, planning, management, and education purposes. General approaches include descriptive narratives based on best professional judgment, application of classification systems (e.g., USFWS classification), sampling of specific structural or functional criteria (e.g., bird survey), and the application...
Author(s)
Candy C. Bartoldus
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 21: Hudson-Raritan Estuary
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2002
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20020101)2002:2L.2024;1-
DOI10.2175/193864702785664789
Volume / Issue2002 / 2
Content sourceWatershed Conference
First / last page(s)2024 - 2037
Copyright2002
Word count198

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Candy C. Bartoldus. CONSIDERATIONS IN SELECTING AN APPROACH TO ASSESSING WETLAND FUNCTION. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 29 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-289255CITANCHOR>.
Candy C. Bartoldus. CONSIDERATIONS IN SELECTING AN APPROACH TO ASSESSING WETLAND FUNCTION. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 29, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-289255CITANCHOR.
Candy C. Bartoldus
CONSIDERATIONS IN SELECTING AN APPROACH TO ASSESSING WETLAND FUNCTION
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 29, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-289255CITANCHOR