lastID = -291973
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT WITH THE STATIC GRANULAR BED REACTOR VERSUS THE UASB
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 12:50:48 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-06 12:50:47 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 00:25:33 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 00:25:32 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT WITH THE STATIC GRANULAR BED REACTOR VERSUS THE UASB

INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT WITH THE STATIC GRANULAR BED REACTOR VERSUS THE UASB

INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT WITH THE STATIC GRANULAR BED REACTOR VERSUS THE UASB

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT WITH THE STATIC GRANULAR BED REACTOR VERSUS THE UASB
Abstract
Performance of the static granular bed reactor (SGBR) was compared to the upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. A statistically designed study was performed to establish significance of differences between the two reactors operating at three different hydraulic retention times (HRTs); 8, 16, and 24 hours. The reactors treated a synthetic wastewater composed of sucrose and non-fat dry milk (NFDM). In the experiment-wise analysis, chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal was significantly higher for the SGBR. Specifically, the SGBR outperformed the UASB at an HRT of eight hours with a COD removal of 90.7% versus 77.5%. Specific COD removal was higher for the UASB ranging from 0.19 to 0.94 gCOD/(gVS·d) versus 0.11 to 0.34 gCOD/(gVS·d) for the SGBR.
Performance of the static granular bed reactor (SGBR) was compared to the upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. A statistically designed study was performed to establish significance of differences between the two reactors operating at three different hydraulic retention times (HRTs); 8, 16, and 24 hours. The reactors treated a synthetic wastewater composed of sucrose and non-fat dry...
Author(s)
Eric Anthony EvansTimothy G. Ellis
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 28: Industrial Issues & Treatment Technology: Innovations in Industrial Biotreatment
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:14L.2219;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705783867477
Volume / Issue2005 / 14
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)2219 - 2231
Copyright2005
Word count129

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT WITH THE STATIC GRANULAR BED REACTOR VERSUS THE UASB'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT WITH THE STATIC GRANULAR BED REACTOR VERSUS THE UASB
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-291973
Get access
-291973
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT WITH THE STATIC GRANULAR BED REACTOR VERSUS THE UASB'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT WITH THE STATIC GRANULAR BED REACTOR VERSUS THE UASB
Abstract
Performance of the static granular bed reactor (SGBR) was compared to the upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. A statistically designed study was performed to establish significance of differences between the two reactors operating at three different hydraulic retention times (HRTs); 8, 16, and 24 hours. The reactors treated a synthetic wastewater composed of sucrose and non-fat dry milk (NFDM). In the experiment-wise analysis, chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal was significantly higher for the SGBR. Specifically, the SGBR outperformed the UASB at an HRT of eight hours with a COD removal of 90.7% versus 77.5%. Specific COD removal was higher for the UASB ranging from 0.19 to 0.94 gCOD/(gVS·d) versus 0.11 to 0.34 gCOD/(gVS·d) for the SGBR.
Performance of the static granular bed reactor (SGBR) was compared to the upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. A statistically designed study was performed to establish significance of differences between the two reactors operating at three different hydraulic retention times (HRTs); 8, 16, and 24 hours. The reactors treated a synthetic wastewater composed of sucrose and non-fat dry...
Author(s)
Eric Anthony EvansTimothy G. Ellis
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 28: Industrial Issues & Treatment Technology: Innovations in Industrial Biotreatment
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:14L.2219;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705783867477
Volume / Issue2005 / 14
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)2219 - 2231
Copyright2005
Word count129

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2026 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Eric Anthony Evans# Timothy G. Ellis. INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT WITH THE STATIC GRANULAR BED REACTOR VERSUS THE UASB. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 1 Apr. 2026. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-291973CITANCHOR>.
Eric Anthony Evans# Timothy G. Ellis. INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT WITH THE STATIC GRANULAR BED REACTOR VERSUS THE UASB. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed April 1, 2026. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-291973CITANCHOR.
Eric Anthony Evans# Timothy G. Ellis
INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT WITH THE STATIC GRANULAR BED REACTOR VERSUS THE UASB
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
April 1, 2026
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-291973CITANCHOR