lastID = -292934
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
When Is IFAS The Right Choice?
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-02-01 07:00:19 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 07:00:18 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
When Is IFAS The Right Choice?

When Is IFAS The Right Choice?

When Is IFAS The Right Choice?

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
When Is IFAS The Right Choice?
Abstract
The Integrated Fixed Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) technology is gaining popularity in the United States as an alternative strategy for upgrading and expanding municipal wastewater treatment facilities. A number of full-scale IFAS plants are now in operation in the United States, which have demonstrated the technical capability and reliability of the process. The question now being asked by consultants, utility managers, and regulatory agencies is – When Is IFAS The Right Choice? An evaluation carried out to help answer this question considered factors that were believed to be critical in selecting the IFAS technology over other plant upgrading strategies. The evaluation was conducted based on the expansion of a hypothetical plant originally designed for carbonaceous BOD removal and now being upgraded to provide nitrification and denitrification. Five treatment technologies were considered: conventional activated sludge, step feed activated sludge, IFAS, biological aerated filters (BAF), and membrane bioreactors (MBR). Numerous sensitivity analyses were carried out to document how variability in the selected cost factors influence the results of the evaluation. Two case studies are included to show how site specific issues and changes in the cost factors from one location to the next can affect process selection.
The Integrated Fixed Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) technology is gaining popularity in the United States as an alternative strategy for upgrading and expanding municipal wastewater treatment facilities. A number of full-scale IFAS plants are now in operation in the United States, which have demonstrated the technical capability and reliability of the process. The question now being asked by...
Author(s)
Terry JohnsonMark SteichenAndrew ShawJames McQuarrieGary Hunter
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 4: Municipal Wastewater Treatment Processes: Hydrodynamic Cavitation Pilot Study for Controlling Cooling Water Quality
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2006
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20060101)2006:13L.200;1-
DOI10.2175/193864706783710659
Volume / Issue2006 / 13
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)200 - 224
Copyright2006
Word count200

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'When Is IFAS The Right Choice?'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
When Is IFAS The Right Choice?
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-292934
Get access
-292934
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'When Is IFAS The Right Choice?'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
When Is IFAS The Right Choice?
Abstract
The Integrated Fixed Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) technology is gaining popularity in the United States as an alternative strategy for upgrading and expanding municipal wastewater treatment facilities. A number of full-scale IFAS plants are now in operation in the United States, which have demonstrated the technical capability and reliability of the process. The question now being asked by consultants, utility managers, and regulatory agencies is – When Is IFAS The Right Choice? An evaluation carried out to help answer this question considered factors that were believed to be critical in selecting the IFAS technology over other plant upgrading strategies. The evaluation was conducted based on the expansion of a hypothetical plant originally designed for carbonaceous BOD removal and now being upgraded to provide nitrification and denitrification. Five treatment technologies were considered: conventional activated sludge, step feed activated sludge, IFAS, biological aerated filters (BAF), and membrane bioreactors (MBR). Numerous sensitivity analyses were carried out to document how variability in the selected cost factors influence the results of the evaluation. Two case studies are included to show how site specific issues and changes in the cost factors from one location to the next can affect process selection.
The Integrated Fixed Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) technology is gaining popularity in the United States as an alternative strategy for upgrading and expanding municipal wastewater treatment facilities. A number of full-scale IFAS plants are now in operation in the United States, which have demonstrated the technical capability and reliability of the process. The question now being asked by...
Author(s)
Terry JohnsonMark SteichenAndrew ShawJames McQuarrieGary Hunter
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 4: Municipal Wastewater Treatment Processes: Hydrodynamic Cavitation Pilot Study for Controlling Cooling Water Quality
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2006
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20060101)2006:13L.200;1-
DOI10.2175/193864706783710659
Volume / Issue2006 / 13
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)200 - 224
Copyright2006
Word count200

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2026 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Terry Johnson# Mark Steichen# Andrew Shaw# James McQuarrie# Gary Hunter. When Is IFAS The Right Choice?. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 1 Apr. 2026. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-292934CITANCHOR>.
Terry Johnson# Mark Steichen# Andrew Shaw# James McQuarrie# Gary Hunter. When Is IFAS The Right Choice?. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed April 1, 2026. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292934CITANCHOR.
Terry Johnson# Mark Steichen# Andrew Shaw# James McQuarrie# Gary Hunter
When Is IFAS The Right Choice?
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
April 1, 2026
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292934CITANCHOR