lastID = -296911
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Evaluating the Implications of End-of-Pipe Effluent Limits for Achieving Site-Specific Instream Water Quality Criteria: An Example From Wisconsin
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 16:37:16 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-06 16:37:15 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 01:33:48 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 01:33:47 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 22:47:06 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 22:47:05 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Evaluating the Implications of End-of-Pipe Effluent Limits for Achieving Site-Specific Instream Water Quality Criteria: An Example From Wisconsin

Evaluating the Implications of End-of-Pipe Effluent Limits for Achieving Site-Specific Instream Water Quality Criteria: An Example From Wisconsin

Evaluating the Implications of End-of-Pipe Effluent Limits for Achieving Site-Specific Instream Water Quality Criteria: An Example From Wisconsin

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Evaluating the Implications of End-of-Pipe Effluent Limits for Achieving Site-Specific Instream Water Quality Criteria: An Example From Wisconsin
Abstract
An analysis of proposed thermal discharge regulations in Wisconsin was conducted to assess the effluent flow conditions required to attain site- and month-specific default acute and sublethal aquatic life criteria as a function of a state-wide end-of-pipe human health-based effluent temperature limit of 120°F and site-specific monthly default receiving water background temperatures. Scenarios relevant to the pulp and paper industry were evaluated for two Wisconsin rivers (U.S.A.), the Upper Wisconsin River (UWR) and the Lower Fox River (LFR). As in the regulation, temperature is treated conservatively such that only cooling by dilution is considered. Dilution ratio calculations based on forms of a heat balance equation quantify the limiting effect of the end-of-pipe limit on the dilution volume needed in each month to attain the water quality criteria (WQC). The discharge of effluent at 120°F is restricted by the instream WQC to flow rates that are a few percent of the 7Q10 flow, particularly in the warm summer months. Calculated maximum effluent flow rates required to meet acute criteria are similar for both rivers, ranging from 5.5% to 8% of 7Q10 during summer months to around 12% in winter months. Values based on sub-lethal criteria range between 1.3% and 5% of the 7Q10. The volume of effluent at 120°F that can be discharged while attaining the sublethal WQC is most restricted in May in both rivers. The most restrictive month based on attainment of the acute criteria in UWR is July and in LFR is August. Using a representative 7Q10 for UWR of 400 MGD, both the acute and sublethal WQC temperatures are attained for an effluent temperature of 120°F in all months at effluent flow rates of less than roughly 10 MGD. All of the default acute WQC are attained at this effluent temperature at effluent flow rates less than roughly 25 MGD. Effluent cooling considering dilution alone is expected to occur most rapidly during the initial stages of dilution, helping to minimize the potential for the exposure of aquatic life to harmful temperatures. This paper illustrates a screening-level assessment of the portion of the receiving stream downstream of an effluent discharge within which the acute and sublethal WQC are exceeded as a function of an end-of-pipe limit. Where this portion is small, risks of adverse thermal impacts to aquatic life are likely to be small.
An analysis of proposed thermal discharge regulations in Wisconsin was conducted to assess the effluent flow conditions required to attain site- and month-specific default acute and sublethal aquatic life criteria as a function of a state-wide end-of-pipe human health-based effluent temperature limit of 120°F and site-specific monthly default receiving water background temperatures. Scenarios...
Author(s)
Douglas B. McLaughlin
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 13 - Site-Specific Objectives and Appropriate Use Designations
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2009
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20090101)2009:6L.972;1-
DOI10.2175/193864709793958534
Volume / Issue2009 / 6
Content sourceTMDLS Conference
First / last page(s)972 - 983
Copyright2009
Word count404
Subject keywordsWater quality criteriaaquatic lifehuman healthNPDEStemperatureeffluent

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Evaluating the Implications of End-of-Pipe Effluent Limits for Achieving Site-Specific Instream Water Quality Criteria: An Example From Wisconsin'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Evaluating the Implications of End-of-Pipe Effluent Limits for Achieving Site-Specific Instream Water Quality Criteria: An Example From Wisconsin
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-296911
Get access
-296911
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Evaluating the Implications of End-of-Pipe Effluent Limits for Achieving Site-Specific Instream Water Quality Criteria: An Example From Wisconsin'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Evaluating the Implications of End-of-Pipe Effluent Limits for Achieving Site-Specific Instream Water Quality Criteria: An Example From Wisconsin
Abstract
An analysis of proposed thermal discharge regulations in Wisconsin was conducted to assess the effluent flow conditions required to attain site- and month-specific default acute and sublethal aquatic life criteria as a function of a state-wide end-of-pipe human health-based effluent temperature limit of 120°F and site-specific monthly default receiving water background temperatures. Scenarios relevant to the pulp and paper industry were evaluated for two Wisconsin rivers (U.S.A.), the Upper Wisconsin River (UWR) and the Lower Fox River (LFR). As in the regulation, temperature is treated conservatively such that only cooling by dilution is considered. Dilution ratio calculations based on forms of a heat balance equation quantify the limiting effect of the end-of-pipe limit on the dilution volume needed in each month to attain the water quality criteria (WQC). The discharge of effluent at 120°F is restricted by the instream WQC to flow rates that are a few percent of the 7Q10 flow, particularly in the warm summer months. Calculated maximum effluent flow rates required to meet acute criteria are similar for both rivers, ranging from 5.5% to 8% of 7Q10 during summer months to around 12% in winter months. Values based on sub-lethal criteria range between 1.3% and 5% of the 7Q10. The volume of effluent at 120°F that can be discharged while attaining the sublethal WQC is most restricted in May in both rivers. The most restrictive month based on attainment of the acute criteria in UWR is July and in LFR is August. Using a representative 7Q10 for UWR of 400 MGD, both the acute and sublethal WQC temperatures are attained for an effluent temperature of 120°F in all months at effluent flow rates of less than roughly 10 MGD. All of the default acute WQC are attained at this effluent temperature at effluent flow rates less than roughly 25 MGD. Effluent cooling considering dilution alone is expected to occur most rapidly during the initial stages of dilution, helping to minimize the potential for the exposure of aquatic life to harmful temperatures. This paper illustrates a screening-level assessment of the portion of the receiving stream downstream of an effluent discharge within which the acute and sublethal WQC are exceeded as a function of an end-of-pipe limit. Where this portion is small, risks of adverse thermal impacts to aquatic life are likely to be small.
An analysis of proposed thermal discharge regulations in Wisconsin was conducted to assess the effluent flow conditions required to attain site- and month-specific default acute and sublethal aquatic life criteria as a function of a state-wide end-of-pipe human health-based effluent temperature limit of 120°F and site-specific monthly default receiving water background temperatures. Scenarios...
Author(s)
Douglas B. McLaughlin
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 13 - Site-Specific Objectives and Appropriate Use Designations
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2009
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20090101)2009:6L.972;1-
DOI10.2175/193864709793958534
Volume / Issue2009 / 6
Content sourceTMDLS Conference
First / last page(s)972 - 983
Copyright2009
Word count404
Subject keywordsWater quality criteriaaquatic lifehuman healthNPDEStemperatureeffluent

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2026 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Douglas B. McLaughlin. Evaluating the Implications of End-of-Pipe Effluent Limits for Achieving Site-Specific Instream Water Quality Criteria: An Example From Wisconsin. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 2 Apr. 2026. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-296911CITANCHOR>.
Douglas B. McLaughlin. Evaluating the Implications of End-of-Pipe Effluent Limits for Achieving Site-Specific Instream Water Quality Criteria: An Example From Wisconsin. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed April 2, 2026. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-296911CITANCHOR.
Douglas B. McLaughlin
Evaluating the Implications of End-of-Pipe Effluent Limits for Achieving Site-Specific Instream Water Quality Criteria: An Example From Wisconsin
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
April 2, 2026
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-296911CITANCHOR