lastID = -10083981
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Turning Up the Heat on Thermal Modeling: Advancements in Thermal Modeling at...
Turning Up the Heat on Thermal Modeling: Advancements in Thermal Modeling at Resource Recovery Facilities
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2023-08-16 08:30:24 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-10-05 12:39:07 Adam Phillips Release
  • 2022-10-05 11:52:30 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-10-05 09:39:35 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-10-05 09:39:34 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-10-05 09:13:48 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-09-08 15:41:06 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-09-07 11:41:29 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Turning Up the Heat on Thermal Modeling: Advancements in Thermal Modeling at...
Turning Up the Heat on Thermal Modeling: Advancements in Thermal Modeling at Resource Recovery Facilities

Turning Up the Heat on Thermal Modeling: Advancements in Thermal Modeling at Resource Recovery Facilities

Turning Up the Heat on Thermal Modeling: Advancements in Thermal Modeling at Resource Recovery Facilities

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Turning Up the Heat on Thermal Modeling: Advancements in Thermal Modeling at...
Turning Up the Heat on Thermal Modeling: Advancements in Thermal Modeling at Resource Recovery Facilities
Abstract
Background
The National Pollution Discharge Elimination System requires that discharges into Waters of the United States do not degrade the receiving water body. Much attention has been given over the past half century to biological oxygen demand and nutrient loading; however, over the past two decades, research has shown growing negative impacts of increased water temperatures on native species in several US regions [e.g. Coho Salmon within the Pacific Northwest]. While there are several ways of reducing the excess thermal load of municipal resource recovery facilities on receiving water bodies, the majority of the programs where large scale thermal load reduction has been required and implemented are either reactive (ie implemented through permit renewals for existing facilities via more stringent thermal load limits) or are for new industrial discharges, where the anticipated thermal load is typically driven by known processes making it more predictable. While a reactive approach has worked thus far, with climate change and urban population growth set to make the thermal loads on water bodies all the more impactful, there is a need to better understand and predict the thermal load of municipal resource recovery facility effluent streams. Not only will this allow for a more proactive approach to thermal management, a better understanding of the thermal sinks and sources within a plant provides an opportunity for low effort optimizations to reduce thermal loads and helps create better predictions of biological treatment processes which can suffer from reduced efficacy at lower process temperatures.
Objectives
In support of evaluations for a new municipal treatment plant and discharge in the Pacific Northwest, this team conducted in depth 'whole system' thermal modeling to determine the cooling needed to meet permit requirements for a new MBR plant both at initial commissioning in the mid-2020s and at various stages of buildout, up to and beyond 2040. This predictive temperature model was created using Excel, Biowin, SWMM, and historical environmental data from the recently expanded National Energy Research Laboratory (NREL) GIS climate data repository. This allowed for predictions of the effluent temperature throughout each year of the system buildout. This model accounts for the following. •Heat flux from external sources such as, Solar and Atmospheric Radiation, Aeration, Conduction and Convection, Evaporation, Mechanical equipment, and Biological reactions. •Advective and Diffusive mixing. •The configuration of the process basins (ie FRP or concrete covers; footprints and depths; primary, recycle, and secondary process flows, etc) Furthermore, by using the NREL environmental data, the model is able to calculate the effective cooling of various active and passive cooling methods accounting for many variables that make performance prediction more difficult. These variables include humidity, ambient air temperature, and air speed. For the purpose of this evaluation the anticipated thermal cooling capacities of cooling towers, chillers, surface aerators, blower aftercoolers, and effluent pipeline geothermal cooling were also able to be evaluated.
Methodology
Daily plant influent temperature data from the last two years, the NREL environmental data from the past 5 years and sampled at 30-minute intervals, Biowin process model results at various flows and process temperatures, and SWMM collection system data predicting collection system flows for the next 20 years where combined into a database that was able to be accessed in excel and interpolated using several lookup functions. As such this was able to provide access to trends over the last five years and up to 20 years in the future. Once this data was made available in excel it was pulled into other parts of the model. Using the above environmental and process data, a flow model was built to account for the total process volume in each basin of the treatment plant and the associated flows between all of the basins – this allowed for the heating and cooling effects in each cell of the wastewater treatment facility to be determined as detailed in the above approach section. This portion of the model was built on the strategies evaluated and proven in the below research, with certain improvements made to account for the increased accuracy and frequency of environmental data.
-'Temperature Modeling in Activated Sluge Systems: A Case Study' by Jacek Makinia, Scott A. Wells, and Piotr Zima.
-'Temperature Modelling and Prediction for Activated Sludge Systems' by Silvia Lippa, Roberto Canziani, Diego Rosso, and Michael Knudson Stenstrom
-'Pulp and Paper: Temperature Modeling in Large Basins' by Marotta and Pezeshk.
Using Visual Basic for Applications an iterative calculation engine was created that allowed the thermal model to progress in 1 minute time intervals. The the current thermal fluxes and transfer rates every 2 hours were used for further analysis, trending, and continuation of a simulation as needed.
Calibration
The model has a high level of anticipated accuracy based on past academic research such as Makinia et al, 2004 and the other sources noted above. However, current phases of this evaluation will perform additional validation via high sample rate (1 sampler / 5 minutes), high accuracy (+/- 0.01 degF), long term temperature monitoring performed at two facilities: (1) a nearby treatment facility with a different process scheme and (2) a treatment plant located farther away but with the same process scheme. While validation is occurring one set of temperature
Findings
The thermal modeling determined that the treatment facility will need cooling during certain months of the year to maintain permit conditions; however, it identified that up to a 30% reduction in the thermal load could be achieved through small changes to the plant design and optimization of the plant discharge pipeline. Additionally, past thermal models preformed on conventional activated sludge treatment systems showed that the thermal load from biological activity represented 25-30% of total heat gain; however, with the smaller basins and higher treatment efficacy of Membrane Bio-Reactors (MBRs) the thermal load from the biology of these systems is approximately 50% of total heat gain.
Relevance
Permit requirements across the United States are likely to become stricter as climate change impacts increase. It is likely that cooling will have to be evaluated on more projects and that plant operations will need a means of better predicting their effluent temperatures. The approach of this model increases the accessibility and transparency of these types of thermal calculations and when shared with the broader water community it is likely that this model will be expanded upon or used with additional software packages (other than excel) that are better suited to process the large amounts of information present.
An iterative municipal treatment plant thermal model was built in Excel/VBA and other software to predict with high confidence the effluent temperature and the efficiency and efficacy of various effluent cooling alternatives for a proposed MBR facility.
SpeakerMurphy, Jennifer
Presentation time
16:00:00
16:25:00
Session time
15:30:00
17:00:00
TopicIntermediate Level, Energy Production, Conservation, and Management, Facility Operations and Maintenance, Sustainability and Climate Change
TopicIntermediate Level, Energy Production, Conservation, and Management, Facility Operations and Maintenance, Sustainability and Climate Change
Author(s)
Murphy, Jennifer
Author(s)Jennifer E. Murphy1; Brandon D. Moss2; Chloe E. Nichol3
Author affiliation(s)Parametrix, Portland, OR1; Parametrix, Seattle, WA2; Parametrix, Bremerton, WA3
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2022
DOI10.2175/193864718825158711
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2022
Word count16

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Turning Up the Heat on Thermal Modeling: Advancements in Thermal Modeling at Resource Recovery Facilities'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Turning Up the Heat on Thermal Modeling: Advancements in Thermal Modeling at...
Turning Up the Heat on Thermal Modeling: Advancements in Thermal Modeling at Resource Recovery Facilities
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10083981
Get access
-10083981
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Turning Up the Heat on Thermal Modeling: Advancements in Thermal Modeling at Resource Recovery Facilities'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Turning Up the Heat on Thermal Modeling: Advancements in Thermal Modeling at...
Turning Up the Heat on Thermal Modeling: Advancements in Thermal Modeling at Resource Recovery Facilities
Abstract
Background
The National Pollution Discharge Elimination System requires that discharges into Waters of the United States do not degrade the receiving water body. Much attention has been given over the past half century to biological oxygen demand and nutrient loading; however, over the past two decades, research has shown growing negative impacts of increased water temperatures on native species in several US regions [e.g. Coho Salmon within the Pacific Northwest]. While there are several ways of reducing the excess thermal load of municipal resource recovery facilities on receiving water bodies, the majority of the programs where large scale thermal load reduction has been required and implemented are either reactive (ie implemented through permit renewals for existing facilities via more stringent thermal load limits) or are for new industrial discharges, where the anticipated thermal load is typically driven by known processes making it more predictable. While a reactive approach has worked thus far, with climate change and urban population growth set to make the thermal loads on water bodies all the more impactful, there is a need to better understand and predict the thermal load of municipal resource recovery facility effluent streams. Not only will this allow for a more proactive approach to thermal management, a better understanding of the thermal sinks and sources within a plant provides an opportunity for low effort optimizations to reduce thermal loads and helps create better predictions of biological treatment processes which can suffer from reduced efficacy at lower process temperatures.
Objectives
In support of evaluations for a new municipal treatment plant and discharge in the Pacific Northwest, this team conducted in depth 'whole system' thermal modeling to determine the cooling needed to meet permit requirements for a new MBR plant both at initial commissioning in the mid-2020s and at various stages of buildout, up to and beyond 2040. This predictive temperature model was created using Excel, Biowin, SWMM, and historical environmental data from the recently expanded National Energy Research Laboratory (NREL) GIS climate data repository. This allowed for predictions of the effluent temperature throughout each year of the system buildout. This model accounts for the following. •Heat flux from external sources such as, Solar and Atmospheric Radiation, Aeration, Conduction and Convection, Evaporation, Mechanical equipment, and Biological reactions. •Advective and Diffusive mixing. •The configuration of the process basins (ie FRP or concrete covers; footprints and depths; primary, recycle, and secondary process flows, etc) Furthermore, by using the NREL environmental data, the model is able to calculate the effective cooling of various active and passive cooling methods accounting for many variables that make performance prediction more difficult. These variables include humidity, ambient air temperature, and air speed. For the purpose of this evaluation the anticipated thermal cooling capacities of cooling towers, chillers, surface aerators, blower aftercoolers, and effluent pipeline geothermal cooling were also able to be evaluated.
Methodology
Daily plant influent temperature data from the last two years, the NREL environmental data from the past 5 years and sampled at 30-minute intervals, Biowin process model results at various flows and process temperatures, and SWMM collection system data predicting collection system flows for the next 20 years where combined into a database that was able to be accessed in excel and interpolated using several lookup functions. As such this was able to provide access to trends over the last five years and up to 20 years in the future. Once this data was made available in excel it was pulled into other parts of the model. Using the above environmental and process data, a flow model was built to account for the total process volume in each basin of the treatment plant and the associated flows between all of the basins – this allowed for the heating and cooling effects in each cell of the wastewater treatment facility to be determined as detailed in the above approach section. This portion of the model was built on the strategies evaluated and proven in the below research, with certain improvements made to account for the increased accuracy and frequency of environmental data.
-'Temperature Modeling in Activated Sluge Systems: A Case Study' by Jacek Makinia, Scott A. Wells, and Piotr Zima.
-'Temperature Modelling and Prediction for Activated Sludge Systems' by Silvia Lippa, Roberto Canziani, Diego Rosso, and Michael Knudson Stenstrom
-'Pulp and Paper: Temperature Modeling in Large Basins' by Marotta and Pezeshk.
Using Visual Basic for Applications an iterative calculation engine was created that allowed the thermal model to progress in 1 minute time intervals. The the current thermal fluxes and transfer rates every 2 hours were used for further analysis, trending, and continuation of a simulation as needed.
Calibration
The model has a high level of anticipated accuracy based on past academic research such as Makinia et al, 2004 and the other sources noted above. However, current phases of this evaluation will perform additional validation via high sample rate (1 sampler / 5 minutes), high accuracy (+/- 0.01 degF), long term temperature monitoring performed at two facilities: (1) a nearby treatment facility with a different process scheme and (2) a treatment plant located farther away but with the same process scheme. While validation is occurring one set of temperature
Findings
The thermal modeling determined that the treatment facility will need cooling during certain months of the year to maintain permit conditions; however, it identified that up to a 30% reduction in the thermal load could be achieved through small changes to the plant design and optimization of the plant discharge pipeline. Additionally, past thermal models preformed on conventional activated sludge treatment systems showed that the thermal load from biological activity represented 25-30% of total heat gain; however, with the smaller basins and higher treatment efficacy of Membrane Bio-Reactors (MBRs) the thermal load from the biology of these systems is approximately 50% of total heat gain.
Relevance
Permit requirements across the United States are likely to become stricter as climate change impacts increase. It is likely that cooling will have to be evaluated on more projects and that plant operations will need a means of better predicting their effluent temperatures. The approach of this model increases the accessibility and transparency of these types of thermal calculations and when shared with the broader water community it is likely that this model will be expanded upon or used with additional software packages (other than excel) that are better suited to process the large amounts of information present.
An iterative municipal treatment plant thermal model was built in Excel/VBA and other software to predict with high confidence the effluent temperature and the efficiency and efficacy of various effluent cooling alternatives for a proposed MBR facility.
SpeakerMurphy, Jennifer
Presentation time
16:00:00
16:25:00
Session time
15:30:00
17:00:00
TopicIntermediate Level, Energy Production, Conservation, and Management, Facility Operations and Maintenance, Sustainability and Climate Change
TopicIntermediate Level, Energy Production, Conservation, and Management, Facility Operations and Maintenance, Sustainability and Climate Change
Author(s)
Murphy, Jennifer
Author(s)Jennifer E. Murphy1; Brandon D. Moss2; Chloe E. Nichol3
Author affiliation(s)Parametrix, Portland, OR1; Parametrix, Seattle, WA2; Parametrix, Bremerton, WA3
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2022
DOI10.2175/193864718825158711
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2022
Word count16

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2026 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Murphy, Jennifer. Turning Up the Heat on Thermal Modeling: Advancements in Thermal Modeling at Resource Recovery Facilities. Water Environment Federation, 2022. Web. 23 May. 2026. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10083981CITANCHOR>.
Murphy, Jennifer. Turning Up the Heat on Thermal Modeling: Advancements in Thermal Modeling at Resource Recovery Facilities. Water Environment Federation, 2022. Accessed May 23, 2026. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10083981CITANCHOR.
Murphy, Jennifer
Turning Up the Heat on Thermal Modeling: Advancements in Thermal Modeling at Resource Recovery Facilities
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
October 10, 2022
May 23, 2026
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10083981CITANCHOR