lastID = -279858
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Giving Credit Where Credit is Due – MBR for Potable Water Reuse
Giving Credit Where Credit is Due – MBR for Potable Water Reuse
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-02-23 14:09:55 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 23:31:34 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 23:31:33 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 23:31:32 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Giving Credit Where Credit is Due – MBR for Potable Water Reuse
Giving Credit Where Credit is Due – MBR for Potable Water Reuse

Giving Credit Where Credit is Due – MBR for Potable Water Reuse

Giving Credit Where Credit is Due – MBR for Potable Water Reuse

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Giving Credit Where Credit is Due – MBR for Potable Water Reuse
Giving Credit Where Credit is Due – MBR for Potable Water Reuse
Abstract
Membrane bioreactors (MBR) are well suited for potable water reuse. Two main obstacles impede further implementation: (1) Articulation and comprehension of pathogen removal capabilities; and (2) Pathogen removal monitoring. Two new empirical studies were conducted to address these issues. These studies explored pathogen reduction under normal operation and after cleaning protocols, and the impact of compromised membranes on pathogen removal. The MBRs showed log removal value (LRV) ranges for Enterococci of > 3.4 to > 6.7, Giardia of > 3.3 to > 6.0, Enterovirus > 3.9 to > 8.7 and Norovirus (all three types) were > 2.7 to > 8.2. Pathogen removal efficiencies were not impacted by chemical cleaning protocols, seasonal variation or membrane age. When membranes were intentionally damaged significant pathogen removal was still seen. With effluent turbidity between 0.2 and 2 NTU, LRVs were greater than 2.2, 2.8 and 4.0 for Giardia, Enterovirus and Norovirus respectively. Advances in turbidity monitoring have enhanced the ability to quickly detect breaches and turbidity responded immediately to changes in membrane integrity. Pressure Decay Testing was also evaluated showing no correlation with pathogen removal and limited ability of the membranes to hold pressure. Data from the two studies and literature supports a minimum credit for protozoa of 3.3 and for virus of 2.7 with turbidity monitoring.
Membrane bioreactors (MBR) are well suited for potable water reuse. Two main obstacles impede further implementation: (1) Articulation and comprehension of pathogen removal capabilities; and (2) Pathogen removal monitoring. Two new empirical studies were conducted to address these issues. These studies explored pathogen reduction under normal operation and after cleaning protocols,...
Author(s)
Stephen KatzAndrew SalvesonNicola FontaineBob BucherJoshua Berryhill
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectResearch Article
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep, 2017
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864717822156866
Volume / Issue2017 / 5
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2017
Word count225

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Giving Credit Where Credit is Due – MBR for Potable Water Reuse'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Giving Credit Where Credit is Due – MBR for Potable Water Reuse
Giving Credit Where Credit is Due – MBR for Potable Water Reuse
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-279858
Get access
-279858
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Giving Credit Where Credit is Due – MBR for Potable Water Reuse'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Giving Credit Where Credit is Due – MBR for Potable Water Reuse
Giving Credit Where Credit is Due – MBR for Potable Water Reuse
Abstract
Membrane bioreactors (MBR) are well suited for potable water reuse. Two main obstacles impede further implementation: (1) Articulation and comprehension of pathogen removal capabilities; and (2) Pathogen removal monitoring. Two new empirical studies were conducted to address these issues. These studies explored pathogen reduction under normal operation and after cleaning protocols, and the impact of compromised membranes on pathogen removal. The MBRs showed log removal value (LRV) ranges for Enterococci of > 3.4 to > 6.7, Giardia of > 3.3 to > 6.0, Enterovirus > 3.9 to > 8.7 and Norovirus (all three types) were > 2.7 to > 8.2. Pathogen removal efficiencies were not impacted by chemical cleaning protocols, seasonal variation or membrane age. When membranes were intentionally damaged significant pathogen removal was still seen. With effluent turbidity between 0.2 and 2 NTU, LRVs were greater than 2.2, 2.8 and 4.0 for Giardia, Enterovirus and Norovirus respectively. Advances in turbidity monitoring have enhanced the ability to quickly detect breaches and turbidity responded immediately to changes in membrane integrity. Pressure Decay Testing was also evaluated showing no correlation with pathogen removal and limited ability of the membranes to hold pressure. Data from the two studies and literature supports a minimum credit for protozoa of 3.3 and for virus of 2.7 with turbidity monitoring.
Membrane bioreactors (MBR) are well suited for potable water reuse. Two main obstacles impede further implementation: (1) Articulation and comprehension of pathogen removal capabilities; and (2) Pathogen removal monitoring. Two new empirical studies were conducted to address these issues. These studies explored pathogen reduction under normal operation and after cleaning protocols,...
Author(s)
Stephen KatzAndrew SalvesonNicola FontaineBob BucherJoshua Berryhill
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectResearch Article
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep, 2017
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864717822156866
Volume / Issue2017 / 5
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2017
Word count225

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2026 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Stephen Katz# Andrew Salveson# Nicola Fontaine# Bob Bucher# Joshua Berryhill. Giving Credit Where Credit is Due – MBR for Potable Water Reuse. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 5 Apr. 2026. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-279858CITANCHOR>.
Stephen Katz# Andrew Salveson# Nicola Fontaine# Bob Bucher# Joshua Berryhill. Giving Credit Where Credit is Due – MBR for Potable Water Reuse. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed April 5, 2026. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-279858CITANCHOR.
Stephen Katz# Andrew Salveson# Nicola Fontaine# Bob Bucher# Joshua Berryhill
Giving Credit Where Credit is Due – MBR for Potable Water Reuse
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
April 5, 2026
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-279858CITANCHOR