lastID = -282440
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: W14-Proceedings
UV Disinfection and Dose Distributions: Optimizing Design and Reducing Risk
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-03-31 02:06:44 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-31 02:06:43 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 06:27:10 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 06:27:09 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: W14-Proceedings
UV Disinfection and Dose Distributions: Optimizing Design and Reducing Risk

UV Disinfection and Dose Distributions: Optimizing Design and Reducing Risk

UV Disinfection and Dose Distributions: Optimizing Design and Reducing Risk

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: W14-Proceedings
UV Disinfection and Dose Distributions: Optimizing Design and Reducing Risk
Abstract
Operation of a UV system was simulated at a wastewater treatment plant. With the UV system operating at a target MS2 RED of 25 mJ/cm2, the E. coli RED delivered by the UV system typically ranged from 15 to 20 mJ/cm2, notably lower than the MS2 RED. In contrast, with the system operating at a target T1UV RED of 18 mJ/cm2, the E. coli RED delivered was typically in the range of 18 to 20 mJ/cm2 with some values spiking higher. Because of these differences, the inactivation of E. coli achieved by the UV system was lower than would have been expected based on the delivered MS2 RED and somewhat greater than would be expected based on the T1UV RED. The analysis shows that sizing a wastewater UV system based on MS2 REDs can lead to inefficient and poor inactivation of indicator microbes such as E. coli, fecal coliform, and total coliform. In contrast, T1UV REDs are an excellent surrogate for indicator microbe inactivation if the required level of disinfection occurs in the disperse region of the UV dose response curve. Ideally, UV systems are sized and operated based on an RED specific to the target microbe, whether that be indicator microbes or target pathogens.
Operation of a UV system was simulated at a wastewater treatment plant. With the UV system operating at a target MS2 RED of 25 mJ/cm2, the E. coli RED delivered by the UV system typically ranged from 15 to 20 mJ/cm2, notably lower than the MS2 RED. In contrast, with the system operating at a target T1UV RED of 18 mJ/cm2, the...
Author(s)
Harold WrightAndrew Salveson
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct, 2014
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864714815943034
Volume / Issue2014 / 18
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2014
Word count215

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'UV Disinfection and Dose Distributions: Optimizing Design and Reducing Risk'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: W14-Proceedings
UV Disinfection and Dose Distributions: Optimizing Design and Reducing Risk
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-282440
Get access
-282440
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'UV Disinfection and Dose Distributions: Optimizing Design and Reducing Risk'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: W14-Proceedings
UV Disinfection and Dose Distributions: Optimizing Design and Reducing Risk
Abstract
Operation of a UV system was simulated at a wastewater treatment plant. With the UV system operating at a target MS2 RED of 25 mJ/cm2, the E. coli RED delivered by the UV system typically ranged from 15 to 20 mJ/cm2, notably lower than the MS2 RED. In contrast, with the system operating at a target T1UV RED of 18 mJ/cm2, the E. coli RED delivered was typically in the range of 18 to 20 mJ/cm2 with some values spiking higher. Because of these differences, the inactivation of E. coli achieved by the UV system was lower than would have been expected based on the delivered MS2 RED and somewhat greater than would be expected based on the T1UV RED. The analysis shows that sizing a wastewater UV system based on MS2 REDs can lead to inefficient and poor inactivation of indicator microbes such as E. coli, fecal coliform, and total coliform. In contrast, T1UV REDs are an excellent surrogate for indicator microbe inactivation if the required level of disinfection occurs in the disperse region of the UV dose response curve. Ideally, UV systems are sized and operated based on an RED specific to the target microbe, whether that be indicator microbes or target pathogens.
Operation of a UV system was simulated at a wastewater treatment plant. With the UV system operating at a target MS2 RED of 25 mJ/cm2, the E. coli RED delivered by the UV system typically ranged from 15 to 20 mJ/cm2, notably lower than the MS2 RED. In contrast, with the system operating at a target T1UV RED of 18 mJ/cm2, the...
Author(s)
Harold WrightAndrew Salveson
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct, 2014
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864714815943034
Volume / Issue2014 / 18
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2014
Word count215

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2026 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Harold Wright# Andrew Salveson. UV Disinfection and Dose Distributions: Optimizing Design and Reducing Risk. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 3 Apr. 2026. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-282440CITANCHOR>.
Harold Wright# Andrew Salveson. UV Disinfection and Dose Distributions: Optimizing Design and Reducing Risk. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed April 3, 2026. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-282440CITANCHOR.
Harold Wright# Andrew Salveson
UV Disinfection and Dose Distributions: Optimizing Design and Reducing Risk
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
April 3, 2026
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-282440CITANCHOR