lastID = -282831
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: W14-Proceedings
The Value of Improving Water Quality: Case Study of Nutrient Reductions in Utah’s Waters
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-03-31 02:05:50 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-31 02:05:49 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 05:34:02 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 05:34:01 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: W14-Proceedings
The Value of Improving Water Quality: Case Study of Nutrient Reductions in Utah’s Waters

The Value of Improving Water Quality: Case Study of Nutrient Reductions in Utah’s Waters

The Value of Improving Water Quality: Case Study of Nutrient Reductions in Utah’s Waters

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: W14-Proceedings
The Value of Improving Water Quality: Case Study of Nutrient Reductions in Utah’s Waters
Abstract
The state of Utah asked the question: What is the cost of failing to address current and future degradation from excess nutrients? Stating the question a different way: What are the benefits to Utahns of maintaining and improving the quality of the state’s rivers and lakes?The state determined current water quality conditions and developed predictions for future scenarios for water quality with and without additional interventions to limit nutrients. The primary data to support the economic benefit assessment were obtained by an economic valuation survey of Utah households. Utahns reported that maintaining water quality is worth from about half a billion to more than a billion dollars while improving water quality is worth more than two times that amount. This means that from an economic perspective it is worth finding cost-effective solutions that achieve the desired results and are within the limits of what households are willing to pay.
The state of Utah asked the question: What is the cost of failing to address current and future degradation from excess nutrients? Stating the question a different way: What are the benefits to Utahns of maintaining and improving the quality of the state’s rivers and lakes?The state determined current water quality conditions and developed predictions for future scenarios for water...
Author(s)
Mary Jo KealyNicholas von StackelbergJeff OstermillerNanette NelsonJohn LoomisPaul Jakus
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct, 2014
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864714815941991
Volume / Issue2014 / 7
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2014
Word count163

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'The Value of Improving Water Quality: Case Study of Nutrient Reductions in Utah’s Waters'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: W14-Proceedings
The Value of Improving Water Quality: Case Study of Nutrient Reductions in Utah’s Waters
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-282831
Get access
-282831
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'The Value of Improving Water Quality: Case Study of Nutrient Reductions in Utah’s Waters'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: W14-Proceedings
The Value of Improving Water Quality: Case Study of Nutrient Reductions in Utah’s Waters
Abstract
The state of Utah asked the question: What is the cost of failing to address current and future degradation from excess nutrients? Stating the question a different way: What are the benefits to Utahns of maintaining and improving the quality of the state’s rivers and lakes?The state determined current water quality conditions and developed predictions for future scenarios for water quality with and without additional interventions to limit nutrients. The primary data to support the economic benefit assessment were obtained by an economic valuation survey of Utah households. Utahns reported that maintaining water quality is worth from about half a billion to more than a billion dollars while improving water quality is worth more than two times that amount. This means that from an economic perspective it is worth finding cost-effective solutions that achieve the desired results and are within the limits of what households are willing to pay.
The state of Utah asked the question: What is the cost of failing to address current and future degradation from excess nutrients? Stating the question a different way: What are the benefits to Utahns of maintaining and improving the quality of the state’s rivers and lakes?The state determined current water quality conditions and developed predictions for future scenarios for water...
Author(s)
Mary Jo KealyNicholas von StackelbergJeff OstermillerNanette NelsonJohn LoomisPaul Jakus
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct, 2014
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864714815941991
Volume / Issue2014 / 7
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2014
Word count163

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2026 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Mary Jo Kealy# Nicholas von Stackelberg# Jeff Ostermiller# Nanette Nelson# John Loomis# Paul Jakus. The Value of Improving Water Quality: Case Study of Nutrient Reductions in Utah’s Waters. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 1 Apr. 2026. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-282831CITANCHOR>.
Mary Jo Kealy# Nicholas von Stackelberg# Jeff Ostermiller# Nanette Nelson# John Loomis# Paul Jakus. The Value of Improving Water Quality: Case Study of Nutrient Reductions in Utah’s Waters. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed April 1, 2026. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-282831CITANCHOR.
Mary Jo Kealy# Nicholas von Stackelberg# Jeff Ostermiller# Nanette Nelson# John Loomis# Paul Jakus
The Value of Improving Water Quality: Case Study of Nutrient Reductions in Utah’s Waters
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
April 1, 2026
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-282831CITANCHOR