lastID = -289943
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
ANOXIC OR ANAEROBIC SELECTORS: WHICH IS BETTER?
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 11:25:22 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-06 11:25:21 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 19:37:56 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 19:37:55 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
ANOXIC OR ANAEROBIC SELECTORS: WHICH IS BETTER?

ANOXIC OR ANAEROBIC SELECTORS: WHICH IS BETTER?

ANOXIC OR ANAEROBIC SELECTORS: WHICH IS BETTER?

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
ANOXIC OR ANAEROBIC SELECTORS: WHICH IS BETTER?
Abstract
Obtaining reliably high compaction characteristics and low SVI values has enormous economic consequences on activated sludge plant design and operation. Now that use of selectors has become more common for achieving low SVI values, the assessment of the full-scale performance characteristics of activated sludge plants incorporating selectors has high value for the design and operation of future plants. Treatment plant effluent quality is seldom analyzed solely on an average basis and the impact peak events have on effluent quality must be considered in design and operation. Descriptive statistics should also be used to assess selector performance, so that the influence of infrequently occurring values on plant design and operation can be assessed. The performance of 21 activated sludge plants incorporating selectors was evaluated. All the selector plants for which post installation data were available showed that the operating SVI values were significantly improved. One plant studied in detail showed that final effluent quality was significantly better after the selector installation. As a group, activated sludge plants with anaerobic selectors outperform those with anoxic selectors. Dissolved oxygen control is just as important in activated sludge plants with selectors as in conventional activated sludge plants.
Obtaining reliably high compaction characteristics and low SVI values has enormous economic consequences on activated sludge plant design and operation. Now that use of selectors has become more common for achieving low SVI values, the assessment of the full-scale performance characteristics of activated sludge plants incorporating selectors has high value for the design and operation of future...
Author(s)
Denny ParkerRon AppletonJohn BratbyHenryk Melcer
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 18 - Plant Operations and Maintenance and Lab Practices: Biological Nutrient Removal and Clarification
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2003
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20030101)2003:11L.582;1-
DOI10.2175/193864703784755869
Volume / Issue2003 / 11
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)582 - 598
Copyright2003
Word count200

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'ANOXIC OR ANAEROBIC SELECTORS: WHICH IS BETTER?'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
ANOXIC OR ANAEROBIC SELECTORS: WHICH IS BETTER?
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-289943
Get access
-289943
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'ANOXIC OR ANAEROBIC SELECTORS: WHICH IS BETTER?'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
ANOXIC OR ANAEROBIC SELECTORS: WHICH IS BETTER?
Abstract
Obtaining reliably high compaction characteristics and low SVI values has enormous economic consequences on activated sludge plant design and operation. Now that use of selectors has become more common for achieving low SVI values, the assessment of the full-scale performance characteristics of activated sludge plants incorporating selectors has high value for the design and operation of future plants. Treatment plant effluent quality is seldom analyzed solely on an average basis and the impact peak events have on effluent quality must be considered in design and operation. Descriptive statistics should also be used to assess selector performance, so that the influence of infrequently occurring values on plant design and operation can be assessed. The performance of 21 activated sludge plants incorporating selectors was evaluated. All the selector plants for which post installation data were available showed that the operating SVI values were significantly improved. One plant studied in detail showed that final effluent quality was significantly better after the selector installation. As a group, activated sludge plants with anaerobic selectors outperform those with anoxic selectors. Dissolved oxygen control is just as important in activated sludge plants with selectors as in conventional activated sludge plants.
Obtaining reliably high compaction characteristics and low SVI values has enormous economic consequences on activated sludge plant design and operation. Now that use of selectors has become more common for achieving low SVI values, the assessment of the full-scale performance characteristics of activated sludge plants incorporating selectors has high value for the design and operation of future...
Author(s)
Denny ParkerRon AppletonJohn BratbyHenryk Melcer
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 18 - Plant Operations and Maintenance and Lab Practices: Biological Nutrient Removal and Clarification
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2003
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20030101)2003:11L.582;1-
DOI10.2175/193864703784755869
Volume / Issue2003 / 11
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)582 - 598
Copyright2003
Word count200

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2026 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Denny Parker# Ron Appleton# John Bratby# Henryk Melcer. ANOXIC OR ANAEROBIC SELECTORS: WHICH IS BETTER?. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 9 Apr. 2026. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-289943CITANCHOR>.
Denny Parker# Ron Appleton# John Bratby# Henryk Melcer. ANOXIC OR ANAEROBIC SELECTORS: WHICH IS BETTER?. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed April 9, 2026. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-289943CITANCHOR.
Denny Parker# Ron Appleton# John Bratby# Henryk Melcer
ANOXIC OR ANAEROBIC SELECTORS: WHICH IS BETTER?
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
April 9, 2026
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-289943CITANCHOR