lastID = -291278
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Comparative Study of Two Methods for Olfactory Measurement: Triangular Odor Bag Method and Dynamic Olfactometry
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-06-14 20:25:11 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-06-14 20:25:10 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:05:59 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:05:58 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 21:09:46 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:09:45 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Comparative Study of Two Methods for Olfactory Measurement: Triangular Odor Bag Method and Dynamic Olfactometry

Comparative Study of Two Methods for Olfactory Measurement: Triangular Odor Bag Method and Dynamic Olfactometry

Comparative Study of Two Methods for Olfactory Measurement: Triangular Odor Bag Method and Dynamic Olfactometry

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Comparative Study of Two Methods for Olfactory Measurement: Triangular Odor Bag Method and Dynamic Olfactometry
Abstract
This report provides a comparative study between the odor measurement method by olfaction,which has been adopted in the Offensive Odor Control Law in Japan and the dynamic olfactometry, which has been standardized in Europe (EN13725:2003). Dilution accuracy, panel selection and measurement results were compared in this study. As a result of the dilution test with three standard odorants, a 46% decrease in the concentration of hydrogen sulfide at a high dilution ratio was observed using the olfactometer, while the Japanese method showed good performance. Among twenty assessors of panel screening tests, eighteen people passed the Japanese test, while only seven passed the European test. In the measurement of three standard odors and six actual source samples, if the panel is the same, the results of both methods corresponded well.
This report provides a comparative study between the odor measurement method by olfaction,which has been adopted in the Offensive Odor Control Law in Japan and the dynamic olfactometry, which has been standardized in Europe (EN13725:2003). Dilution accuracy, panel selection and measurement results were compared in this study. As a result of the dilution test with three standard odorants, a 46%...
Author(s)
Junko NishikawaHiroyuki UenoHiguchi Masato Sukehisa TatsuichiYoshiharu Iwasaki
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 1: Methods for Sampling, Measuring and Analyzing Emissions I
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2004
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20040101)2004:3L.30;1-
DOI10.2175/193864704784327304
Volume / Issue2004 / 3
Content sourceOdors and Air Pollutants Conference
First / last page(s)30 - 37
Copyright2004
Word count144

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Comparative Study of Two Methods for Olfactory Measurement: Triangular Odor Bag Method and Dynamic Olfactometry'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Comparative Study of Two Methods for Olfactory Measurement: Triangular Odor Bag Method and Dynamic Olfactometry
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-291278
Get access
-291278
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Comparative Study of Two Methods for Olfactory Measurement: Triangular Odor Bag Method and Dynamic Olfactometry'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Comparative Study of Two Methods for Olfactory Measurement: Triangular Odor Bag Method and Dynamic Olfactometry
Abstract
This report provides a comparative study between the odor measurement method by olfaction,which has been adopted in the Offensive Odor Control Law in Japan and the dynamic olfactometry, which has been standardized in Europe (EN13725:2003). Dilution accuracy, panel selection and measurement results were compared in this study. As a result of the dilution test with three standard odorants, a 46% decrease in the concentration of hydrogen sulfide at a high dilution ratio was observed using the olfactometer, while the Japanese method showed good performance. Among twenty assessors of panel screening tests, eighteen people passed the Japanese test, while only seven passed the European test. In the measurement of three standard odors and six actual source samples, if the panel is the same, the results of both methods corresponded well.
This report provides a comparative study between the odor measurement method by olfaction,which has been adopted in the Offensive Odor Control Law in Japan and the dynamic olfactometry, which has been standardized in Europe (EN13725:2003). Dilution accuracy, panel selection and measurement results were compared in this study. As a result of the dilution test with three standard odorants, a 46%...
Author(s)
Junko NishikawaHiroyuki UenoHiguchi Masato Sukehisa TatsuichiYoshiharu Iwasaki
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 1: Methods for Sampling, Measuring and Analyzing Emissions I
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2004
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20040101)2004:3L.30;1-
DOI10.2175/193864704784327304
Volume / Issue2004 / 3
Content sourceOdors and Air Pollutants Conference
First / last page(s)30 - 37
Copyright2004
Word count144

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Junko Nishikawa# Hiroyuki Ueno# Higuchi Masato Sukehisa Tatsuichi# Yoshiharu Iwasaki. Comparative Study of Two Methods for Olfactory Measurement: Triangular Odor Bag Method and Dynamic Olfactometry. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 9 Jul. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-291278CITANCHOR>.
Junko Nishikawa# Hiroyuki Ueno# Higuchi Masato Sukehisa Tatsuichi# Yoshiharu Iwasaki. Comparative Study of Two Methods for Olfactory Measurement: Triangular Odor Bag Method and Dynamic Olfactometry. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed July 9, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-291278CITANCHOR.
Junko Nishikawa# Hiroyuki Ueno# Higuchi Masato Sukehisa Tatsuichi# Yoshiharu Iwasaki
Comparative Study of Two Methods for Olfactory Measurement: Triangular Odor Bag Method and Dynamic Olfactometry
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
July 9, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-291278CITANCHOR