lastID = -291373
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
East vs. West: Developing Antidegradation Implementation Guidance
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 16:53:54 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 02:46:01 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 22:14:41 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 22:14:40 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
East vs. West: Developing Antidegradation Implementation Guidance

East vs. West: Developing Antidegradation Implementation Guidance

East vs. West: Developing Antidegradation Implementation Guidance

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
East vs. West: Developing Antidegradation Implementation Guidance
Abstract
This paper provides background information and analyses related to development of antidegradation policy implementation procedures pursuant to the federal Clean Water Act (CWA) requirements. The antidegradation concepts contained in state and federal regulations are relatively simple and straightforward: 1) all waters should be protected at some basic level; 2) waters that are cleaner than the basic level should be protected at the existing higher level unless there is a significant local benefit; and 3) some pristine or unique waters should not be degraded even if those benefits can be demonstrated. The definitions and details associated with this simple three-part approach, however, can be complex.In the coming years, development of detailed implementation guidance will become increasingly important to states in complying with the CWA. Most states have general antidegradation policies. However, in recent years, lawsuits have been filed against states and/or EPA for not implementing the CWA antidegradation requirements. Such suits or threat of suits have compelled some states to develop more detailed antidegradation implementation procedures. Other states, with general policies and procedures, wished to have more detailed procedures that program staff is able to implement.Tetra Tech assisted a western and eastern state (Arizona and West Virginia) in developing detailed antidegradation implementation guidance pursuant to the CWA requirements. The guidance addressed such areas as: tiered protection levels; applicability of antidegradation review; antidegradation requirements for specific activities; baseline water quality; assessment of the level of degradation; alternatives analysis; social and economic analysis; and public participation.Although states face similar issues in grappling with antidegradation implementation, the approach taken on a given issue can vary significantly based on the geographic region. Drawing on the West Virginia and Arizona case studies and other research, this paper will discuss key antidegradation issues, similarities and differences taken in eastern and western antidegradation implementation, and lessons learned.
This paper provides background information and analyses related to development of antidegradation policy implementation procedures pursuant to the federal Clean Water Act (CWA) requirements. The antidegradation concepts contained in state and federal regulations are relatively simple and straightforward: 1) all waters should be protected at some basic level; 2) waters that are cleaner than the...
Author(s)
Barry TonningKimberly Brewer
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 8: TMDL, Water Quality Standards, and Trading II
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2004
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20040101)2004:4L.876;1-
DOI10.2175/193864704790896793
Volume / Issue2004 / 4
Content sourceWatershed Conference
First / last page(s)876 - 891
Copyright2004
Word count306

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'East vs. West: Developing Antidegradation Implementation Guidance'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
East vs. West: Developing Antidegradation Implementation Guidance
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-291373
Get access
-291373
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'East vs. West: Developing Antidegradation Implementation Guidance'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
East vs. West: Developing Antidegradation Implementation Guidance
Abstract
This paper provides background information and analyses related to development of antidegradation policy implementation procedures pursuant to the federal Clean Water Act (CWA) requirements. The antidegradation concepts contained in state and federal regulations are relatively simple and straightforward: 1) all waters should be protected at some basic level; 2) waters that are cleaner than the basic level should be protected at the existing higher level unless there is a significant local benefit; and 3) some pristine or unique waters should not be degraded even if those benefits can be demonstrated. The definitions and details associated with this simple three-part approach, however, can be complex.In the coming years, development of detailed implementation guidance will become increasingly important to states in complying with the CWA. Most states have general antidegradation policies. However, in recent years, lawsuits have been filed against states and/or EPA for not implementing the CWA antidegradation requirements. Such suits or threat of suits have compelled some states to develop more detailed antidegradation implementation procedures. Other states, with general policies and procedures, wished to have more detailed procedures that program staff is able to implement.Tetra Tech assisted a western and eastern state (Arizona and West Virginia) in developing detailed antidegradation implementation guidance pursuant to the CWA requirements. The guidance addressed such areas as: tiered protection levels; applicability of antidegradation review; antidegradation requirements for specific activities; baseline water quality; assessment of the level of degradation; alternatives analysis; social and economic analysis; and public participation.Although states face similar issues in grappling with antidegradation implementation, the approach taken on a given issue can vary significantly based on the geographic region. Drawing on the West Virginia and Arizona case studies and other research, this paper will discuss key antidegradation issues, similarities and differences taken in eastern and western antidegradation implementation, and lessons learned.
This paper provides background information and analyses related to development of antidegradation policy implementation procedures pursuant to the federal Clean Water Act (CWA) requirements. The antidegradation concepts contained in state and federal regulations are relatively simple and straightforward: 1) all waters should be protected at some basic level; 2) waters that are cleaner than the...
Author(s)
Barry TonningKimberly Brewer
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 8: TMDL, Water Quality Standards, and Trading II
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2004
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20040101)2004:4L.876;1-
DOI10.2175/193864704790896793
Volume / Issue2004 / 4
Content sourceWatershed Conference
First / last page(s)876 - 891
Copyright2004
Word count306

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2026 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Barry Tonning# Kimberly Brewer. East vs. West: Developing Antidegradation Implementation Guidance. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 1 Apr. 2026. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-291373CITANCHOR>.
Barry Tonning# Kimberly Brewer. East vs. West: Developing Antidegradation Implementation Guidance. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed April 1, 2026. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-291373CITANCHOR.
Barry Tonning# Kimberly Brewer
East vs. West: Developing Antidegradation Implementation Guidance
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
April 1, 2026
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-291373CITANCHOR