lastID = -291761
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
THE IMPORTANCE OF MODELING METAL UPTAKE AND RELEASE IN THE EBPR PROCESSES
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-02-01 05:14:33 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 05:14:32 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
THE IMPORTANCE OF MODELING METAL UPTAKE AND RELEASE IN THE EBPR PROCESSES

THE IMPORTANCE OF MODELING METAL UPTAKE AND RELEASE IN THE EBPR PROCESSES

THE IMPORTANCE OF MODELING METAL UPTAKE AND RELEASE IN THE EBPR PROCESSES

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
THE IMPORTANCE OF MODELING METAL UPTAKE AND RELEASE IN THE EBPR PROCESSES
Abstract
A cation uptake and release model implemented in BioWin™ (v2.1) was applied to simulate the fate of phosphorus and metal cations (Mg2+, K+and Ca2+) during batch uptake and release tests as well as full-scale EBPR plants. Simulation results during batch uptake and release tests and full-scale EBPR plants were compared with those obtained via experimental measurements. The BioWin™ model was able to predict final effluent quality close to field observed data. The model predicted anoxic P uptake and secondary P release in the last anoxic zones at plants where nitrate was likely depleted. However, a discrepancy was frequently found for both dynamic batch simulation and steady-state full-scale simulation at all plants studied. A noticeable difference was found between simulated phosphorus and the metal cation concentrations in the various anaerobic, anoxic and aerobic zones across both the EBPR processes and those measured in the field. The model did not provide accurate predictions for full-scale plant performance when using the P/HAc ratio determined from batch uptake and release tests. pH changes predicted by the model were typical for BNR plants (slight increase in pH in anaerobic zones) but did not agree with the measured values for the batch tests. This directly affected all pH sensitive reactions, such as potential precipitation of calcium phosphate which likely occurred during batch tests for the two plants studied. During batch uptake and release tests and across different zones in the full-scale EBPR processes, the model was able to simulate the trend of two metal cations (Mg2+, K+) associated with phosphorus, but not as well for Ca2+. The stoichiometric ratio of metal cations to phosphorus determined from batch tests varied among different plants, suggesting that there are hereditary factors from each plant that affect metal cation requirements. It is necessary to use site-specific metal cation/P stoichiometry and limit metal concentration in the BNR model for assessing the effects of metal cation limitations on P removal performance.
A cation uptake and release model implemented in BioWin™ (v2.1) was applied to simulate the fate of phosphorus and metal cations (Mg2+, K+and Ca2+) during batch uptake and release tests as well as full-scale EBPR plants. Simulation results during batch uptake and release tests and full-scale EBPR plants were compared with those obtained via experimental measurements. The BioWin™ model...
Author(s)
A. Z. GuI. TakácsM. BenischH.D. StenselJ.B. Neethling
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 52: Municipal Wastewater Treatment Processes: Modeling to Optimize Wastewater Treatment Processes and Design
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:11L.4316;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705783866766
Volume / Issue2005 / 11
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)4316 - 4338
Copyright2005
Word count332

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'THE IMPORTANCE OF MODELING METAL UPTAKE AND RELEASE IN THE EBPR PROCESSES'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
THE IMPORTANCE OF MODELING METAL UPTAKE AND RELEASE IN THE EBPR PROCESSES
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-291761
Get access
-291761
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'THE IMPORTANCE OF MODELING METAL UPTAKE AND RELEASE IN THE EBPR PROCESSES'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
THE IMPORTANCE OF MODELING METAL UPTAKE AND RELEASE IN THE EBPR PROCESSES
Abstract
A cation uptake and release model implemented in BioWin™ (v2.1) was applied to simulate the fate of phosphorus and metal cations (Mg2+, K+and Ca2+) during batch uptake and release tests as well as full-scale EBPR plants. Simulation results during batch uptake and release tests and full-scale EBPR plants were compared with those obtained via experimental measurements. The BioWin™ model was able to predict final effluent quality close to field observed data. The model predicted anoxic P uptake and secondary P release in the last anoxic zones at plants where nitrate was likely depleted. However, a discrepancy was frequently found for both dynamic batch simulation and steady-state full-scale simulation at all plants studied. A noticeable difference was found between simulated phosphorus and the metal cation concentrations in the various anaerobic, anoxic and aerobic zones across both the EBPR processes and those measured in the field. The model did not provide accurate predictions for full-scale plant performance when using the P/HAc ratio determined from batch uptake and release tests. pH changes predicted by the model were typical for BNR plants (slight increase in pH in anaerobic zones) but did not agree with the measured values for the batch tests. This directly affected all pH sensitive reactions, such as potential precipitation of calcium phosphate which likely occurred during batch tests for the two plants studied. During batch uptake and release tests and across different zones in the full-scale EBPR processes, the model was able to simulate the trend of two metal cations (Mg2+, K+) associated with phosphorus, but not as well for Ca2+. The stoichiometric ratio of metal cations to phosphorus determined from batch tests varied among different plants, suggesting that there are hereditary factors from each plant that affect metal cation requirements. It is necessary to use site-specific metal cation/P stoichiometry and limit metal concentration in the BNR model for assessing the effects of metal cation limitations on P removal performance.
A cation uptake and release model implemented in BioWin™ (v2.1) was applied to simulate the fate of phosphorus and metal cations (Mg2+, K+and Ca2+) during batch uptake and release tests as well as full-scale EBPR plants. Simulation results during batch uptake and release tests and full-scale EBPR plants were compared with those obtained via experimental measurements. The BioWin™ model...
Author(s)
A. Z. GuI. TakácsM. BenischH.D. StenselJ.B. Neethling
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 52: Municipal Wastewater Treatment Processes: Modeling to Optimize Wastewater Treatment Processes and Design
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:11L.4316;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705783866766
Volume / Issue2005 / 11
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)4316 - 4338
Copyright2005
Word count332

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2026 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
A. Z. Gu# I. Takács# M. Benisch# H.D. Stensel# J.B. Neethling. THE IMPORTANCE OF MODELING METAL UPTAKE AND RELEASE IN THE EBPR PROCESSES. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 28 Apr. 2026. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-291761CITANCHOR>.
A. Z. Gu# I. Takács# M. Benisch# H.D. Stensel# J.B. Neethling. THE IMPORTANCE OF MODELING METAL UPTAKE AND RELEASE IN THE EBPR PROCESSES. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed April 28, 2026. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-291761CITANCHOR.
A. Z. Gu# I. Takács# M. Benisch# H.D. Stensel# J.B. Neethling
THE IMPORTANCE OF MODELING METAL UPTAKE AND RELEASE IN THE EBPR PROCESSES
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
April 28, 2026
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-291761CITANCHOR