lastID = -298497
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Elemental Sulfur (S°) as a Supplemental Electron Donor for Wastewater Denitrification
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 18:27:46 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 18:27:44 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 22:25:25 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 22:25:24 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 22:25:23 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Elemental Sulfur (S°) as a Supplemental Electron Donor for Wastewater Denitrification

Elemental Sulfur (S°) as a Supplemental Electron Donor for Wastewater Denitrification

Elemental Sulfur (S°) as a Supplemental Electron Donor for Wastewater Denitrification

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Elemental Sulfur (S°) as a Supplemental Electron Donor for Wastewater Denitrification
Abstract
Many utilities are seeking more cost effective, safe, and reliable electron donors for biological nutrient removal (BNR). Elemental sulfur (S°) may be an attractive option, but little is known about the feasibility of S°-based denitrification and its kinetics. In this research, we used bench–scale, S° packed–bed reactors to determine denitrification fluxes as a function of bulk concentrations. Both nitrate and nitrite were removed after 30–50 days. Maximum fluxes were 0.8 gN/m2-day to 1 gN/m2-day. As biofilm thickness increased over time, maximum fluxes increased. However, fluxes for low nitrate condition decreased, providing an increase in the apparent Ks for nitrate. Reactors maintained sustained high fluxes for over 140 days, without any backwashing. However, when a vigorous backwashing was carried out, all the biomass was lost and the reactor needed a 30-day period to return to previous fluxes. Results suggest that biomass production is slow, as expected for an autotrophic system, but that reasonably high denitrification fluxes can be obtained. Care must be taken not to remove excessive biomass during backwashing.
Many utilities are seeking more cost effective, safe, and reliable electron donors for biological nutrient removal (BNR). Elemental sulfur (S°) may be an attractive option, but little is known about the feasibility of S°-based denitrification and its kinetics. In this research, we used bench–scale, S° packed–bed reactors to determine denitrification fluxes as a function of...
Author(s)
Yue WangJuan Pablo PavissichFabrizio SabbaCharles BottRobert Nerenberg
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 32: Supplemental Carbon for Denitrification
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2011
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20110101)2011:15L.1590;1-
DOI10.2175/193864711802713432
Volume / Issue2011 / 15
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)1590 - 1597
Copyright2011
Word count183
Subject keywordselemental sulfurdenitrificationsupplemental electron donorbiofilm

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Elemental Sulfur (S°) as a Supplemental Electron Donor for Wastewater Denitrification'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Elemental Sulfur (S°) as a Supplemental Electron Donor for Wastewater Denitrification
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-298497
Get access
-298497
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Elemental Sulfur (S°) as a Supplemental Electron Donor for Wastewater Denitrification'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Elemental Sulfur (S°) as a Supplemental Electron Donor for Wastewater Denitrification
Abstract
Many utilities are seeking more cost effective, safe, and reliable electron donors for biological nutrient removal (BNR). Elemental sulfur (S°) may be an attractive option, but little is known about the feasibility of S°-based denitrification and its kinetics. In this research, we used bench–scale, S° packed–bed reactors to determine denitrification fluxes as a function of bulk concentrations. Both nitrate and nitrite were removed after 30–50 days. Maximum fluxes were 0.8 gN/m2-day to 1 gN/m2-day. As biofilm thickness increased over time, maximum fluxes increased. However, fluxes for low nitrate condition decreased, providing an increase in the apparent Ks for nitrate. Reactors maintained sustained high fluxes for over 140 days, without any backwashing. However, when a vigorous backwashing was carried out, all the biomass was lost and the reactor needed a 30-day period to return to previous fluxes. Results suggest that biomass production is slow, as expected for an autotrophic system, but that reasonably high denitrification fluxes can be obtained. Care must be taken not to remove excessive biomass during backwashing.
Many utilities are seeking more cost effective, safe, and reliable electron donors for biological nutrient removal (BNR). Elemental sulfur (S°) may be an attractive option, but little is known about the feasibility of S°-based denitrification and its kinetics. In this research, we used bench–scale, S° packed–bed reactors to determine denitrification fluxes as a function of...
Author(s)
Yue WangJuan Pablo PavissichFabrizio SabbaCharles BottRobert Nerenberg
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 32: Supplemental Carbon for Denitrification
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2011
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20110101)2011:15L.1590;1-
DOI10.2175/193864711802713432
Volume / Issue2011 / 15
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)1590 - 1597
Copyright2011
Word count183
Subject keywordselemental sulfurdenitrificationsupplemental electron donorbiofilm

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2026 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Yue Wang# Juan Pablo Pavissich# Fabrizio Sabba# Charles Bott# Robert Nerenberg. Elemental Sulfur (S°) as a Supplemental Electron Donor for Wastewater Denitrification. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 13 Mar. 2026. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-298497CITANCHOR>.
Yue Wang# Juan Pablo Pavissich# Fabrizio Sabba# Charles Bott# Robert Nerenberg. Elemental Sulfur (S°) as a Supplemental Electron Donor for Wastewater Denitrification. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed March 13, 2026. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298497CITANCHOR.
Yue Wang# Juan Pablo Pavissich# Fabrizio Sabba# Charles Bott# Robert Nerenberg
Elemental Sulfur (S°) as a Supplemental Electron Donor for Wastewater Denitrification
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
March 13, 2026
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298497CITANCHOR