lastID = -281517
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: W13-Proceedings
Dealing with a Model Monster: How to Overcome Challenges to Modeling Complex Nutrient Removal Upgrades
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-03-31 01:18:04 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-31 01:18:03 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 21:37:46 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:37:45 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: W13-Proceedings
Dealing with a Model Monster: How to Overcome Challenges to Modeling Complex Nutrient Removal Upgrades

Dealing with a Model Monster: How to Overcome Challenges to Modeling Complex Nutrient Removal Upgrades

Dealing with a Model Monster: How to Overcome Challenges to Modeling Complex Nutrient Removal Upgrades

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: W13-Proceedings
Dealing with a Model Monster: How to Overcome Challenges to Modeling Complex Nutrient Removal Upgrades
Abstract
Faced with a 1 mg/L Total Phosphorus effluent permit limit and an unusually high influent phosphorus concentration due to industrial discharges, the City of Salem, Ohio was forced to consider various advanced nutrient removal upgrade options for their existing 4 mgd secondary biological treatment plant with the following general process flow schematic (Figure 1).The City initially planned to install a coagulant chemical feed system to comply with the TP limit; however, upon further review of the option, the city became concerned with the significant increases in O&M cost and unmanageable sludge production levels that would result from its implementation. In addition, a prior demonstration project showed limited biological phosphorus removal performance in the activated sludge system. These concerns initiated a comprehensive plant evaluation to determine if process reconfiguration could achieve sufficient biological phosphorus removal (Bio-P) to minimize the amount of chemical addition, reduce sludge disposal tonnage, and improve overall plant operations. As a part of the evaluation process, computer modeling software (GPS-X, Hydromantis, 2011) was used to assess current conditions at the plant (Figure 2) and evaluate proposed process modifications for the WWTP. The modeling process was eventually helpful to designers in evaluating and refining design ideas for the plant, developing a three-phase upgrade plan to address solids handling bottlenecks, biological upgrades, and ancillary improvements including recycle stream treatment; however, the complexity of suggested design ideas made initial modeling runs too time consuming for practical use. Through the project's development, several techniques were utilized to increase the execution speed of model simulations such that model run times were decreased, without lessening the integrity of model results. This paper examines the various process configurations and modeling techniques used to reduce model run time, while still producing adequate modeling results to support evaluation of the design ideas.
Faced with a 1 mg/L Total Phosphorus effluent permit limit and an unusually high influent phosphorus concentration due to industrial discharges, the City of Salem, Ohio was forced to consider various advanced nutrient removal upgrade options for their existing 4 mgd secondary biological treatment plant with the following general process flow schematic (Figure 1).
Author(s)
Kristin WallerMark GreeneBill MeinertRick ReedMatt Hoopes
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct, 2013
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864713813673785
Volume / Issue2013 / 16
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2013
Word count311

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Dealing with a Model Monster: How to Overcome Challenges to Modeling Complex Nutrient Removal Upgrades'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: W13-Proceedings
Dealing with a Model Monster: How to Overcome Challenges to Modeling Complex Nutrient Removal Upgrades
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-281517
Get access
-281517
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Dealing with a Model Monster: How to Overcome Challenges to Modeling Complex Nutrient Removal Upgrades'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: W13-Proceedings
Dealing with a Model Monster: How to Overcome Challenges to Modeling Complex Nutrient Removal Upgrades
Abstract
Faced with a 1 mg/L Total Phosphorus effluent permit limit and an unusually high influent phosphorus concentration due to industrial discharges, the City of Salem, Ohio was forced to consider various advanced nutrient removal upgrade options for their existing 4 mgd secondary biological treatment plant with the following general process flow schematic (Figure 1).The City initially planned to install a coagulant chemical feed system to comply with the TP limit; however, upon further review of the option, the city became concerned with the significant increases in O&M cost and unmanageable sludge production levels that would result from its implementation. In addition, a prior demonstration project showed limited biological phosphorus removal performance in the activated sludge system. These concerns initiated a comprehensive plant evaluation to determine if process reconfiguration could achieve sufficient biological phosphorus removal (Bio-P) to minimize the amount of chemical addition, reduce sludge disposal tonnage, and improve overall plant operations. As a part of the evaluation process, computer modeling software (GPS-X, Hydromantis, 2011) was used to assess current conditions at the plant (Figure 2) and evaluate proposed process modifications for the WWTP. The modeling process was eventually helpful to designers in evaluating and refining design ideas for the plant, developing a three-phase upgrade plan to address solids handling bottlenecks, biological upgrades, and ancillary improvements including recycle stream treatment; however, the complexity of suggested design ideas made initial modeling runs too time consuming for practical use. Through the project's development, several techniques were utilized to increase the execution speed of model simulations such that model run times were decreased, without lessening the integrity of model results. This paper examines the various process configurations and modeling techniques used to reduce model run time, while still producing adequate modeling results to support evaluation of the design ideas.
Faced with a 1 mg/L Total Phosphorus effluent permit limit and an unusually high influent phosphorus concentration due to industrial discharges, the City of Salem, Ohio was forced to consider various advanced nutrient removal upgrade options for their existing 4 mgd secondary biological treatment plant with the following general process flow schematic (Figure 1).
Author(s)
Kristin WallerMark GreeneBill MeinertRick ReedMatt Hoopes
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct, 2013
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864713813673785
Volume / Issue2013 / 16
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2013
Word count311

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2025 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Kristin Waller# Mark Greene# Bill Meinert# Rick Reed# Matt Hoopes. Dealing with a Model Monster: How to Overcome Challenges to Modeling Complex Nutrient Removal Upgrades. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 29 Oct. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-281517CITANCHOR>.
Kristin Waller# Mark Greene# Bill Meinert# Rick Reed# Matt Hoopes. Dealing with a Model Monster: How to Overcome Challenges to Modeling Complex Nutrient Removal Upgrades. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed October 29, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-281517CITANCHOR.
Kristin Waller# Mark Greene# Bill Meinert# Rick Reed# Matt Hoopes
Dealing with a Model Monster: How to Overcome Challenges to Modeling Complex Nutrient Removal Upgrades
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
October 29, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-281517CITANCHOR