lastID = -292807
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Time vs. Space: Two Successful Biological Nutrient Removal Strategies
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 12:56:51 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-06 12:56:50 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 05:40:23 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 05:40:22 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Time vs. Space: Two Successful Biological Nutrient Removal Strategies

Time vs. Space: Two Successful Biological Nutrient Removal Strategies

Time vs. Space: Two Successful Biological Nutrient Removal Strategies

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Time vs. Space: Two Successful Biological Nutrient Removal Strategies
Abstract
Two distinct strategies have been practiced successfully for nutrient removals at a facility. One utilizes a continuous flow strategy with designated anaerobic, anoxic and aerobic zones. This strategy was targeted for biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal with minimal chemical addition. The other utilizes anaerobic, anoxic and aerobic cycle times in sequence at existing basins under a timer control. Chemical addition is a primary means of phosphorus removal in this strategy.Results show good performance in meeting current discharge limits. Process parameters for design and operation are presented with corresponding discussion on advantages and disadvantages of two strategies.
Two distinct strategies have been practiced successfully for nutrient removals at a facility. One utilizes a continuous flow strategy with designated anaerobic, anoxic and aerobic zones. This strategy was targeted for biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal with minimal chemical addition. The other utilizes anaerobic, anoxic and aerobic cycle times in sequence at existing basins under a timer...
Author(s)
S.J. KangK. P. OlmsteadT. NobingerC. PatelG. Hill
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 23: Industrial Issues and Treatment Technology: Nutrient Removal and Recovery
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2006
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20060101)2006:11L.1766;1-
DOI10.2175/193864706783750556
Volume / Issue2006 / 11
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)1766 - 1775
Copyright2006
Word count105

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Time vs. Space: Two Successful Biological Nutrient Removal Strategies'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Time vs. Space: Two Successful Biological Nutrient Removal Strategies
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-292807
Get access
-292807
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Time vs. Space: Two Successful Biological Nutrient Removal Strategies'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Time vs. Space: Two Successful Biological Nutrient Removal Strategies
Abstract
Two distinct strategies have been practiced successfully for nutrient removals at a facility. One utilizes a continuous flow strategy with designated anaerobic, anoxic and aerobic zones. This strategy was targeted for biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal with minimal chemical addition. The other utilizes anaerobic, anoxic and aerobic cycle times in sequence at existing basins under a timer control. Chemical addition is a primary means of phosphorus removal in this strategy.Results show good performance in meeting current discharge limits. Process parameters for design and operation are presented with corresponding discussion on advantages and disadvantages of two strategies.
Two distinct strategies have been practiced successfully for nutrient removals at a facility. One utilizes a continuous flow strategy with designated anaerobic, anoxic and aerobic zones. This strategy was targeted for biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal with minimal chemical addition. The other utilizes anaerobic, anoxic and aerobic cycle times in sequence at existing basins under a timer...
Author(s)
S.J. KangK. P. OlmsteadT. NobingerC. PatelG. Hill
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 23: Industrial Issues and Treatment Technology: Nutrient Removal and Recovery
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2006
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20060101)2006:11L.1766;1-
DOI10.2175/193864706783750556
Volume / Issue2006 / 11
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)1766 - 1775
Copyright2006
Word count105

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
S.J. Kang# K. P. Olmstead# T. Nobinger# C. Patel# G. Hill. Time vs. Space: Two Successful Biological Nutrient Removal Strategies. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 1 Oct. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-292807CITANCHOR>.
S.J. Kang# K. P. Olmstead# T. Nobinger# C. Patel# G. Hill. Time vs. Space: Two Successful Biological Nutrient Removal Strategies. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed October 1, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292807CITANCHOR.
S.J. Kang# K. P. Olmstead# T. Nobinger# C. Patel# G. Hill
Time vs. Space: Two Successful Biological Nutrient Removal Strategies
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
October 1, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292807CITANCHOR