lastID = -10028410
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Alternatives for Improving Biological Treatment Performance of a Pulp and Paper...
Alternatives for Improving Biological Treatment Performance of a Pulp and Paper Wastewater
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2023-08-16 07:51:42 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-06 13:07:03 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-06 13:07:02 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-24 12:03:38 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-24 10:29:56 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-24 10:29:55 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-24 07:33:08 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-24 07:33:07 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-23 16:32:11 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-23 16:32:10 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-23 14:55:47 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-23 14:55:46 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Alternatives for Improving Biological Treatment Performance of a Pulp and Paper...
Alternatives for Improving Biological Treatment Performance of a Pulp and Paper Wastewater

Alternatives for Improving Biological Treatment Performance of a Pulp and Paper Wastewater

Alternatives for Improving Biological Treatment Performance of a Pulp and Paper Wastewater

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Alternatives for Improving Biological Treatment Performance of a Pulp and Paper...
Alternatives for Improving Biological Treatment Performance of a Pulp and Paper Wastewater
Abstract
The treatment of wastewater generated at pulp and paper mills has mostly consisted of aerated stabilization basins (ASBs) and to a lesser extent activated sludge treatment (AST) systems. However, lower effluent limits for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) as well as limits for nitrogen and phosphorus are generating renewed interest in other biological treatment technologies. An alternative biological treatment technology is the moving bed biological reactor (MBBR). In this project, the ASB and AST technologies were compared to pre-treatment by MBBR followed by the ASB process. The comparison was performed by conducting bench-scale treatability tests which enabled analyses of effluent quality and settling rates in a controlled environment. The comparison showed that the system using MBBR as pre-treatment yielded better settling biosolids than either the ASB or the AST systems alone. Additionally, the MBBR pre-treatment process enabled the downstream ASB process to achieve lower effluent chemical oxygen demand (COD), BOD, color and ammonia concentrations than either the ASB or the AST treatment technologies.
The treatment of wastewater generated at pulp and paper mills has mostly consisted of aerated stabilization basins (ASBs) and to a lesser extent activated sludge treatment (AST) systems. However, lower effluent limits for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) as well as limits for nitrogen and phosphorus are generating renewed interest in other biological treatment technologies. An alternative biological treatment technology is the moving bed biological reactor (MBBR). In this project, the ASB and AST technologies were compared to pre-treatment by MBBR followed by the ASB process. The comparison was performed by conducting bench-scale treatability tests which enabled analyses of effluent quality and settling rates in a controlled environment. The comparison showed that the system using MBBR as pre-treatment yielded better settling biosolids than either the ASB or the AST systems alone. Additionally, the MBBR pre-treatment process enabled the downstream ASB process to achieve lower effluent chemical oxygen demand (COD), BOD, color and ammonia concentrations than either the ASB or the AST treatment technologies.
SpeakerPatrick, George
Presentation time
13:00:00
13:20:00
Session time
13:00:00
13:40:00
SessionPulp and Paper Wastewater Treatment Issues
Session number602
TopicIndustrial Issues and Treatment Technologies
TopicIndustrial Issues and Treatment Technologies
Author(s)
J.C. StanfillG.C. PatrickG.C. PatrickH. Giles
Author(s)J.C. Stanfill1; G.C. Patrick1; G.C. Patrick1; H. Giles2;
Author affiliation(s)Arcadis, GA1; ARCADIS-US, GA2
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2020
DOI10.2175/193864718825157567
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2020
Word count13

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Alternatives for Improving Biological Treatment Performance of a Pulp and Paper Wastewater'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Alternatives for Improving Biological Treatment Performance of a Pulp and Paper...
Alternatives for Improving Biological Treatment Performance of a Pulp and Paper Wastewater
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10028410
Get access
-10028410
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Alternatives for Improving Biological Treatment Performance of a Pulp and Paper Wastewater'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Alternatives for Improving Biological Treatment Performance of a Pulp and Paper...
Alternatives for Improving Biological Treatment Performance of a Pulp and Paper Wastewater
Abstract
The treatment of wastewater generated at pulp and paper mills has mostly consisted of aerated stabilization basins (ASBs) and to a lesser extent activated sludge treatment (AST) systems. However, lower effluent limits for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) as well as limits for nitrogen and phosphorus are generating renewed interest in other biological treatment technologies. An alternative biological treatment technology is the moving bed biological reactor (MBBR). In this project, the ASB and AST technologies were compared to pre-treatment by MBBR followed by the ASB process. The comparison was performed by conducting bench-scale treatability tests which enabled analyses of effluent quality and settling rates in a controlled environment. The comparison showed that the system using MBBR as pre-treatment yielded better settling biosolids than either the ASB or the AST systems alone. Additionally, the MBBR pre-treatment process enabled the downstream ASB process to achieve lower effluent chemical oxygen demand (COD), BOD, color and ammonia concentrations than either the ASB or the AST treatment technologies.
The treatment of wastewater generated at pulp and paper mills has mostly consisted of aerated stabilization basins (ASBs) and to a lesser extent activated sludge treatment (AST) systems. However, lower effluent limits for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) as well as limits for nitrogen and phosphorus are generating renewed interest in other biological treatment technologies. An alternative biological treatment technology is the moving bed biological reactor (MBBR). In this project, the ASB and AST technologies were compared to pre-treatment by MBBR followed by the ASB process. The comparison was performed by conducting bench-scale treatability tests which enabled analyses of effluent quality and settling rates in a controlled environment. The comparison showed that the system using MBBR as pre-treatment yielded better settling biosolids than either the ASB or the AST systems alone. Additionally, the MBBR pre-treatment process enabled the downstream ASB process to achieve lower effluent chemical oxygen demand (COD), BOD, color and ammonia concentrations than either the ASB or the AST treatment technologies.
SpeakerPatrick, George
Presentation time
13:00:00
13:20:00
Session time
13:00:00
13:40:00
SessionPulp and Paper Wastewater Treatment Issues
Session number602
TopicIndustrial Issues and Treatment Technologies
TopicIndustrial Issues and Treatment Technologies
Author(s)
J.C. StanfillG.C. PatrickG.C. PatrickH. Giles
Author(s)J.C. Stanfill1; G.C. Patrick1; G.C. Patrick1; H. Giles2;
Author affiliation(s)Arcadis, GA1; ARCADIS-US, GA2
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2020
DOI10.2175/193864718825157567
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2020
Word count13

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
J.C. Stanfill# G.C. Patrick# G.C. Patrick# H. Giles#. Alternatives for Improving Biological Treatment Performance of a Pulp and Paper Wastewater. Water Environment Federation, 2020. Web. 20 May. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10028410CITANCHOR>.
J.C. Stanfill# G.C. Patrick# G.C. Patrick# H. Giles#. Alternatives for Improving Biological Treatment Performance of a Pulp and Paper Wastewater. Water Environment Federation, 2020. Accessed May 20, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10028410CITANCHOR.
J.C. Stanfill# G.C. Patrick# G.C. Patrick# H. Giles#
Alternatives for Improving Biological Treatment Performance of a Pulp and Paper Wastewater
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
October 7, 2020
May 20, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10028410CITANCHOR