lastID = -10028430
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Can Biologically-activated Carbon be Used for Removal of 1,4-Dioxane and Other Trace...
Can Biologically-activated Carbon be Used for Removal of 1,4-Dioxane and Other Trace Contaminants In an Indirect Potable Reuse System?
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2023-08-16 07:55:26 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 20:10:32 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-24 12:04:17 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-24 10:21:44 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-24 10:21:43 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-24 07:26:05 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-24 07:26:04 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-23 16:24:57 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-23 16:24:56 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-23 14:56:16 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-23 14:56:15 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Can Biologically-activated Carbon be Used for Removal of 1,4-Dioxane and Other Trace...
Can Biologically-activated Carbon be Used for Removal of 1,4-Dioxane and Other Trace Contaminants In an Indirect Potable Reuse System?

Can Biologically-activated Carbon be Used for Removal of 1,4-Dioxane and Other Trace Contaminants In an Indirect Potable Reuse System?

Can Biologically-activated Carbon be Used for Removal of 1,4-Dioxane and Other Trace Contaminants In an Indirect Potable Reuse System?

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Can Biologically-activated Carbon be Used for Removal of 1,4-Dioxane and Other Trace...
Can Biologically-activated Carbon be Used for Removal of 1,4-Dioxane and Other Trace Contaminants In an Indirect Potable Reuse System?
Abstract
1,4-dioxane is commonly used as a solvent stabilizer for 1,1,1 trichloroethane and is readily soluble in water with a low Henry’s law constant. It is poorly removed by conventional air stripping and adsorption techniques and is generally thought to be resistant to biodegradation. Certain bacteria, such as Rhodococcus sp., Pseudonocardia sp. and Mycobacterium sp. have been shown to biodegrade 1,4-dioxane by monooxygenase enzymes in presence of co-substrates such as propane, butane and tetrahydrofuran (THF) (Vainberg et al. 2006; Mahendra et al. 2007). The goal of this project was to evaluate the feasibility of using biologically activated carbon (BAC) filtration used for indirect potable reuse biodegradation of 1,4-dioxane. 1,4-dioxane can be removed by hydroxyl radicals in an advanced oxidation (AOP) process, such as ozone hydrogen peroxide or UV peroxide (Stefan and Bolton, 1998). However, biodegradation in a BAC filter would be cost efficient and mitigate production of disinfection byproducts produced by the above AOPs.
1,4-dioxane is commonly used as a solvent stabilizer for 1,1,1 trichloroethane and is readily soluble in water with a low Henry’s law constant. It is poorly removed by conventional air stripping and adsorption techniques and is generally thought to be resistant to biodegradation. Certain bacteria, such as Rhodococcus sp., Pseudonocardia sp. and Mycobacterium sp. have been shown to biodegrade 1,4-dioxane by monooxygenase enzymes in presence of co-substrates such as propane, butane and tetrahydrofuran (THF) (Vainberg et al. 2006; Mahendra et al. 2007). The goal of this project was to evaluate the feasibility of using biologically activated carbon (BAC) filtration used for indirect potable reuse biodegradation of 1,4-dioxane. 1,4-dioxane can be removed by hydroxyl radicals in an advanced oxidation (AOP) process, such as ozone hydrogen peroxide or UV peroxide (Stefan and Bolton, 1998). However, biodegradation in a BAC filter would be cost efficient and mitigate production of disinfection byproducts produced by the above AOPs.
SpeakerVaidya, Ramola
Presentation time
09:10:00
09:30:00
Session time
08:30:00
10:10:00
SessionAvoid the Brine: Achieving Potable Reuse Without RO
Session number328
TopicMicroconstituents, Water Reuse and Reclamation, Water Supply and Management
TopicMicroconstituents, Water Reuse and Reclamation, Water Supply and Management
Author(s)
C.B. BottR. VaidyaG. Salazar-BenitesC. WilsonA. Pruden
Author(s)C.B. Bott2; R. Vaidya1; G. Salazar-Benites2; C. Wilson2; A. Pruden1;
Author affiliation(s)Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Virginia Tech1; Hampton Roads Sanitation District2
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2020
DOI10.2175/193864718825157842
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2020
Word count20

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Can Biologically-activated Carbon be Used for Removal of 1,4-Dioxane and Other Trace Contaminants In an Indirect Potable Reuse System?'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Can Biologically-activated Carbon be Used for Removal of 1,4-Dioxane and Other Trace...
Can Biologically-activated Carbon be Used for Removal of 1,4-Dioxane and Other Trace Contaminants In an Indirect Potable Reuse System?
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10028430
Get access
-10028430
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Can Biologically-activated Carbon be Used for Removal of 1,4-Dioxane and Other Trace Contaminants In an Indirect Potable Reuse System?'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Can Biologically-activated Carbon be Used for Removal of 1,4-Dioxane and Other Trace...
Can Biologically-activated Carbon be Used for Removal of 1,4-Dioxane and Other Trace Contaminants In an Indirect Potable Reuse System?
Abstract
1,4-dioxane is commonly used as a solvent stabilizer for 1,1,1 trichloroethane and is readily soluble in water with a low Henry’s law constant. It is poorly removed by conventional air stripping and adsorption techniques and is generally thought to be resistant to biodegradation. Certain bacteria, such as Rhodococcus sp., Pseudonocardia sp. and Mycobacterium sp. have been shown to biodegrade 1,4-dioxane by monooxygenase enzymes in presence of co-substrates such as propane, butane and tetrahydrofuran (THF) (Vainberg et al. 2006; Mahendra et al. 2007). The goal of this project was to evaluate the feasibility of using biologically activated carbon (BAC) filtration used for indirect potable reuse biodegradation of 1,4-dioxane. 1,4-dioxane can be removed by hydroxyl radicals in an advanced oxidation (AOP) process, such as ozone hydrogen peroxide or UV peroxide (Stefan and Bolton, 1998). However, biodegradation in a BAC filter would be cost efficient and mitigate production of disinfection byproducts produced by the above AOPs.
1,4-dioxane is commonly used as a solvent stabilizer for 1,1,1 trichloroethane and is readily soluble in water with a low Henry’s law constant. It is poorly removed by conventional air stripping and adsorption techniques and is generally thought to be resistant to biodegradation. Certain bacteria, such as Rhodococcus sp., Pseudonocardia sp. and Mycobacterium sp. have been shown to biodegrade 1,4-dioxane by monooxygenase enzymes in presence of co-substrates such as propane, butane and tetrahydrofuran (THF) (Vainberg et al. 2006; Mahendra et al. 2007). The goal of this project was to evaluate the feasibility of using biologically activated carbon (BAC) filtration used for indirect potable reuse biodegradation of 1,4-dioxane. 1,4-dioxane can be removed by hydroxyl radicals in an advanced oxidation (AOP) process, such as ozone hydrogen peroxide or UV peroxide (Stefan and Bolton, 1998). However, biodegradation in a BAC filter would be cost efficient and mitigate production of disinfection byproducts produced by the above AOPs.
SpeakerVaidya, Ramola
Presentation time
09:10:00
09:30:00
Session time
08:30:00
10:10:00
SessionAvoid the Brine: Achieving Potable Reuse Without RO
Session number328
TopicMicroconstituents, Water Reuse and Reclamation, Water Supply and Management
TopicMicroconstituents, Water Reuse and Reclamation, Water Supply and Management
Author(s)
C.B. BottR. VaidyaG. Salazar-BenitesC. WilsonA. Pruden
Author(s)C.B. Bott2; R. Vaidya1; G. Salazar-Benites2; C. Wilson2; A. Pruden1;
Author affiliation(s)Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Virginia Tech1; Hampton Roads Sanitation District2
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2020
DOI10.2175/193864718825157842
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2020
Word count20

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
C.B. Bott#R. Vaidya#G. Salazar-Benites#C. Wilson#A. Pruden#. Can Biologically-activated Carbon be Used for Removal of 1,4-Dioxane and Other Trace Contaminants In an Indirect Potable Reuse System?. Water Environment Federation, 2020. Web. 1 Jul. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10028430CITANCHOR>.
C.B. Bott#R. Vaidya#G. Salazar-Benites#C. Wilson#A. Pruden#. Can Biologically-activated Carbon be Used for Removal of 1,4-Dioxane and Other Trace Contaminants In an Indirect Potable Reuse System?. Water Environment Federation, 2020. Accessed July 1, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10028430CITANCHOR.
C.B. Bott#R. Vaidya#G. Salazar-Benites#C. Wilson#A. Pruden#
Can Biologically-activated Carbon be Used for Removal of 1,4-Dioxane and Other Trace Contaminants In an Indirect Potable Reuse System?
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
October 6, 2020
July 1, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10028430CITANCHOR