lastID = -10028620
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Performance Evaluation of Parallel Operation of Conventional Primary Treatment...
Performance Evaluation of Parallel Operation of Conventional Primary Treatment versus Primary Filtration and Biofiltration Systems
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2023-08-16 08:19:41 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 20:08:30 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-24 12:10:26 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-24 10:25:45 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-24 10:25:43 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-24 07:29:28 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-24 07:29:27 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-23 16:28:35 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-23 16:28:33 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-23 15:00:46 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-23 15:00:45 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Performance Evaluation of Parallel Operation of Conventional Primary Treatment...
Performance Evaluation of Parallel Operation of Conventional Primary Treatment versus Primary Filtration and Biofiltration Systems

Performance Evaluation of Parallel Operation of Conventional Primary Treatment versus Primary Filtration and Biofiltration Systems

Performance Evaluation of Parallel Operation of Conventional Primary Treatment versus Primary Filtration and Biofiltration Systems

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Performance Evaluation of Parallel Operation of Conventional Primary Treatment...
Performance Evaluation of Parallel Operation of Conventional Primary Treatment versus Primary Filtration and Biofiltration Systems
Abstract
In this project, the performance of two advanced primary treatment (APT) technologies, a pile cloth disk primary filter (CDPF) and a compressible media filter (CMF), were compared to conventional primary treatment. Conventional primary treatment (i.e., primary clarifier) typically removes 55 to 60% of total suspended solids (TSS) and 30 to 40% of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) from raw wastewater (Metcalf and Eddy, 2014). Primary filtration (PF) and biofiltration are emerging APT technologies that can remove high solids and organics load from raw wastewater after screening. PF typically achieves removal efficiencies of 75 to 85% for total suspended solids and 50 to 65% for biochemical oxygen demand (Caliskaner et al., 2018). Biofiltration also offers the potential for removing soluble organic fractions due to biological activity, which occurs because of increased depth of the filter medium and longer contact times. Additionally, the impact of APT on downstream operations such as secondary treatment and anaerobic digestion was evaluated.
In this project, the performance of two advanced primary treatment (APT) technologies, a pile cloth disk primary filter (CDPF) and a compressible media filter (CMF), were compared to conventional primary treatment. Conventional primary treatment (i.e., primary clarifier) typically removes 55 to 60% of total suspended solids (TSS) and 30 to 40% of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) from raw wastewater (Metcalf and Eddy, 2014). Primary filtration (PF) and biofiltration are emerging APT technologies that can remove high solids and organics load from raw wastewater after screening. PF typically achieves removal efficiencies of 75 to 85% for total suspended solids and 50 to 65% for biochemical oxygen demand (Caliskaner et al., 2018). Biofiltration also offers the potential for removing soluble organic fractions due to biological activity, which occurs because of increased depth of the filter medium and longer contact times. Additionally, the impact of APT on downstream operations such as secondary treatment and anaerobic digestion was evaluated.
SpeakerCaliskaner, Onder
Presentation time
16:00:00
16:30:00
Session time
15:30:00
16:30:00
SessionCellulose Recovery From Wastewater
Session number7F
TopicBiosolids and Residuals, Energy Production, Conservation, and Management, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design, Research and Innovation
TopicBiosolids and Residuals, Energy Production, Conservation, and Management, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design, Research and Innovation
Author(s)
O. CaliskanerG. TchobanoglousL.N. ImaniJ. LundB. DavisJ. Rios FariasT. Reid
Author(s)O. Caliskaner1; G. Tchobanoglous2; L.N. Imani1; J. Lund1; B. Davis3; J. Rios Farias3; T. Reid4;
Author affiliation(s)Kennedy/Jenks Consultants1; University of California at Davis, CA2; Linda County Water District3; Aqua-Aerobics Systems, Inc. 4; WesTech Engineering, Inc. 5
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2020
DOI10.2175/193864718825157434
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2020
Word count16

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Performance Evaluation of Parallel Operation of Conventional Primary Treatment versus Primary Filtration and Biofiltration Systems'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Performance Evaluation of Parallel Operation of Conventional Primary Treatment...
Performance Evaluation of Parallel Operation of Conventional Primary Treatment versus Primary Filtration and Biofiltration Systems
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10028620
Get access
-10028620
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Performance Evaluation of Parallel Operation of Conventional Primary Treatment versus Primary Filtration and Biofiltration Systems'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Performance Evaluation of Parallel Operation of Conventional Primary Treatment...
Performance Evaluation of Parallel Operation of Conventional Primary Treatment versus Primary Filtration and Biofiltration Systems
Abstract
In this project, the performance of two advanced primary treatment (APT) technologies, a pile cloth disk primary filter (CDPF) and a compressible media filter (CMF), were compared to conventional primary treatment. Conventional primary treatment (i.e., primary clarifier) typically removes 55 to 60% of total suspended solids (TSS) and 30 to 40% of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) from raw wastewater (Metcalf and Eddy, 2014). Primary filtration (PF) and biofiltration are emerging APT technologies that can remove high solids and organics load from raw wastewater after screening. PF typically achieves removal efficiencies of 75 to 85% for total suspended solids and 50 to 65% for biochemical oxygen demand (Caliskaner et al., 2018). Biofiltration also offers the potential for removing soluble organic fractions due to biological activity, which occurs because of increased depth of the filter medium and longer contact times. Additionally, the impact of APT on downstream operations such as secondary treatment and anaerobic digestion was evaluated.
In this project, the performance of two advanced primary treatment (APT) technologies, a pile cloth disk primary filter (CDPF) and a compressible media filter (CMF), were compared to conventional primary treatment. Conventional primary treatment (i.e., primary clarifier) typically removes 55 to 60% of total suspended solids (TSS) and 30 to 40% of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) from raw wastewater (Metcalf and Eddy, 2014). Primary filtration (PF) and biofiltration are emerging APT technologies that can remove high solids and organics load from raw wastewater after screening. PF typically achieves removal efficiencies of 75 to 85% for total suspended solids and 50 to 65% for biochemical oxygen demand (Caliskaner et al., 2018). Biofiltration also offers the potential for removing soluble organic fractions due to biological activity, which occurs because of increased depth of the filter medium and longer contact times. Additionally, the impact of APT on downstream operations such as secondary treatment and anaerobic digestion was evaluated.
SpeakerCaliskaner, Onder
Presentation time
16:00:00
16:30:00
Session time
15:30:00
16:30:00
SessionCellulose Recovery From Wastewater
Session number7F
TopicBiosolids and Residuals, Energy Production, Conservation, and Management, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design, Research and Innovation
TopicBiosolids and Residuals, Energy Production, Conservation, and Management, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design, Research and Innovation
Author(s)
O. CaliskanerG. TchobanoglousL.N. ImaniJ. LundB. DavisJ. Rios FariasT. Reid
Author(s)O. Caliskaner1; G. Tchobanoglous2; L.N. Imani1; J. Lund1; B. Davis3; J. Rios Farias3; T. Reid4;
Author affiliation(s)Kennedy/Jenks Consultants1; University of California at Davis, CA2; Linda County Water District3; Aqua-Aerobics Systems, Inc. 4; WesTech Engineering, Inc. 5
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2020
DOI10.2175/193864718825157434
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2020
Word count16

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
O. Caliskaner#G. Tchobanoglous#L.N. Imani#J. Lund#B. Davis#J. Rios Farias#T. Reid#. Performance Evaluation of Parallel Operation of Conventional Primary Treatment versus Primary Filtration and Biofiltration Systems. Water Environment Federation, 2020. Web. 21 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10028620CITANCHOR>.
O. Caliskaner#G. Tchobanoglous#L.N. Imani#J. Lund#B. Davis#J. Rios Farias#T. Reid#. Performance Evaluation of Parallel Operation of Conventional Primary Treatment versus Primary Filtration and Biofiltration Systems. Water Environment Federation, 2020. Accessed June 21, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10028620CITANCHOR.
O. Caliskaner#G. Tchobanoglous#L.N. Imani#J. Lund#B. Davis#J. Rios Farias#T. Reid#
Performance Evaluation of Parallel Operation of Conventional Primary Treatment versus Primary Filtration and Biofiltration Systems
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
October 6, 2020
June 21, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10028620CITANCHOR