lastID = -10101598
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: When Less is More: A Wastewater Treatment Consolidation Case Study
When Less is More: A Wastewater Treatment Consolidation Case Study
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2024-02-20 13:08:10 Adam Phillips
  • 2024-02-20 09:42:25 Adam Phillips
  • 2024-02-13 12:33:58 Adam Phillips Release
  • 2024-02-12 16:32:13 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: When Less is More: A Wastewater Treatment Consolidation Case Study
When Less is More: A Wastewater Treatment Consolidation Case Study

When Less is More: A Wastewater Treatment Consolidation Case Study

When Less is More: A Wastewater Treatment Consolidation Case Study

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: When Less is More: A Wastewater Treatment Consolidation Case Study
When Less is More: A Wastewater Treatment Consolidation Case Study
Abstract
Purpose In 2021, the City of Pearland, Texas (City) was facing a $200M problem: two of the City's oldest and most critical wastewater assets (the Barry Rose and Longwood Water Reclamation Facilities) were reaching the end of their useful lives. Additionally, construction costs were inflating unpredictably and incurring concern over utility rate increases, and updates to the 2020 FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) changed the floodway at the Barry Rose Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) making the site less sustainable for an expansion. The scale and complexity of these problems caused the City to reevaluate the previous plan to consolidate the Longwood WRF and send flows to an expanded Barry Rose WRF. This reevaluation prompted the City to begin a Water Reclamation Facility Consolidation Study in June of 2021 with the goal of identifying the best overall value alternative that would consolidate Longwood, address the condition of Barry Rose, phase the project to mitigate near term rate impacts, minimize lifecycle cost, and invest in a resilient, sustainable WRF site. This study was conducted over seven months of collaborative workshops with multiple stakeholders and performed an objective comparison of five alternatives that considered multiple treatment sites, conveyance routes, and infrastructure phasing. The study resulted in a unanimous recommendation that not only saved the City over $12M in near term capital costs, but also efficiently and cost effectively addressed the condition of the City's aging infrastructure and helped position them to serve future growth. The major themes of this presentation are included below. Conference attendees will walk away with insights and guidelines for consolidation studies as well as methods for determining a plan of action when multiple stakeholders are involved. This presentation will showcase how Pearland addressed the challenges they faced and will present factors for other utilities and consultants to consider when evaluating costly infrastructure consolidation alternatives. A Collaborative Approach Multiple stakeholder groups were involved throughout all phases of this study and collaborated for seven months via multi-hour workshops and numerous additional meetings, phone calls, and site visits. City staff of all levels and across multiple departments participated including City management, the Engineering and Capital Projects leadership team, Public Works operations staff, and members of the finance department and acquisition management teams. The project team also included the City's Wastewater Master Planning consultant, Freese and Nichols, Inc. (FNI) and teaming partner, Plummer; and the City's Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR), McCarthy Building Companies. Pearland's City Council also played a key role in the study, as effective utility plans are backed by a governing body and involve public engagement. Pearland leveraged both groups of stakeholders to effectively communicate the value of the utility's services and accomplish buy-in on the Consolidation Plan. This presentation will discuss the key role each stakeholder played in identifying a cost-effective consolidation alternative, and the interdependence of these roles. This presentation will also discuss how the partnership between Pearland's staff at all levels, FNI, Plummer, and McCarthy resulted in a strong business case for the final project recommendation. Determining a Plan of Action With multiple stakeholders involved, coming to a unanimous decision can be a challenge. This presentation will discuss the method for assessing the alternatives in addition to the visualization tools that were utilized to assist the project team in coming to a unanimous recommendation. The presentation will also discuss the process for keeping stakeholders engaged and present tools that can be applied to utilities everywhere. Take-Aways Pearland's case study serves as a compelling success story for effective stakeholder engagement for utilities and consultants everywhere. Conference attendees will walk away with ideas on how to employ stakeholder engagement methods and visualization tools to develop strong business cases for managing their utilities.
This paper was presented at the WEF/AWWA Utility Management Conference, February 13-16, 2024.
SpeakerRyan, Kendall
Presentation time
11:30:00
12:00:00
Session time
10:30:00
12:00:00
SessionUtility Collaboration & Regionalization A
Session number02
Session locationOregon Convention Center, Portland, Oregon
TopicUtility Collaboration & Regionalization
TopicUtility Collaboration & Regionalization
Author(s)
Ryan, Kendall
Author(s)K. Ryan1, B. Keller1, J. Barber, L. Reid1, D. Munn1, R. Weatherly1, J. Appel2
Author affiliation(s)Freese and Nichols 1; City of Sugar Land 2;
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Feb 2024
DOI10.2175/193864718825159323
Volume / Issue
Content sourceUtility Management Conference
Word count11

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'When Less is More: A Wastewater Treatment Consolidation Case Study'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: When Less is More: A Wastewater Treatment Consolidation Case Study
When Less is More: A Wastewater Treatment Consolidation Case Study
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10101598
Get access
-10101598
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'When Less is More: A Wastewater Treatment Consolidation Case Study'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: When Less is More: A Wastewater Treatment Consolidation Case Study
When Less is More: A Wastewater Treatment Consolidation Case Study
Abstract
Purpose In 2021, the City of Pearland, Texas (City) was facing a $200M problem: two of the City's oldest and most critical wastewater assets (the Barry Rose and Longwood Water Reclamation Facilities) were reaching the end of their useful lives. Additionally, construction costs were inflating unpredictably and incurring concern over utility rate increases, and updates to the 2020 FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) changed the floodway at the Barry Rose Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) making the site less sustainable for an expansion. The scale and complexity of these problems caused the City to reevaluate the previous plan to consolidate the Longwood WRF and send flows to an expanded Barry Rose WRF. This reevaluation prompted the City to begin a Water Reclamation Facility Consolidation Study in June of 2021 with the goal of identifying the best overall value alternative that would consolidate Longwood, address the condition of Barry Rose, phase the project to mitigate near term rate impacts, minimize lifecycle cost, and invest in a resilient, sustainable WRF site. This study was conducted over seven months of collaborative workshops with multiple stakeholders and performed an objective comparison of five alternatives that considered multiple treatment sites, conveyance routes, and infrastructure phasing. The study resulted in a unanimous recommendation that not only saved the City over $12M in near term capital costs, but also efficiently and cost effectively addressed the condition of the City's aging infrastructure and helped position them to serve future growth. The major themes of this presentation are included below. Conference attendees will walk away with insights and guidelines for consolidation studies as well as methods for determining a plan of action when multiple stakeholders are involved. This presentation will showcase how Pearland addressed the challenges they faced and will present factors for other utilities and consultants to consider when evaluating costly infrastructure consolidation alternatives. A Collaborative Approach Multiple stakeholder groups were involved throughout all phases of this study and collaborated for seven months via multi-hour workshops and numerous additional meetings, phone calls, and site visits. City staff of all levels and across multiple departments participated including City management, the Engineering and Capital Projects leadership team, Public Works operations staff, and members of the finance department and acquisition management teams. The project team also included the City's Wastewater Master Planning consultant, Freese and Nichols, Inc. (FNI) and teaming partner, Plummer; and the City's Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR), McCarthy Building Companies. Pearland's City Council also played a key role in the study, as effective utility plans are backed by a governing body and involve public engagement. Pearland leveraged both groups of stakeholders to effectively communicate the value of the utility's services and accomplish buy-in on the Consolidation Plan. This presentation will discuss the key role each stakeholder played in identifying a cost-effective consolidation alternative, and the interdependence of these roles. This presentation will also discuss how the partnership between Pearland's staff at all levels, FNI, Plummer, and McCarthy resulted in a strong business case for the final project recommendation. Determining a Plan of Action With multiple stakeholders involved, coming to a unanimous decision can be a challenge. This presentation will discuss the method for assessing the alternatives in addition to the visualization tools that were utilized to assist the project team in coming to a unanimous recommendation. The presentation will also discuss the process for keeping stakeholders engaged and present tools that can be applied to utilities everywhere. Take-Aways Pearland's case study serves as a compelling success story for effective stakeholder engagement for utilities and consultants everywhere. Conference attendees will walk away with ideas on how to employ stakeholder engagement methods and visualization tools to develop strong business cases for managing their utilities.
This paper was presented at the WEF/AWWA Utility Management Conference, February 13-16, 2024.
SpeakerRyan, Kendall
Presentation time
11:30:00
12:00:00
Session time
10:30:00
12:00:00
SessionUtility Collaboration & Regionalization A
Session number02
Session locationOregon Convention Center, Portland, Oregon
TopicUtility Collaboration & Regionalization
TopicUtility Collaboration & Regionalization
Author(s)
Ryan, Kendall
Author(s)K. Ryan1, B. Keller1, J. Barber, L. Reid1, D. Munn1, R. Weatherly1, J. Appel2
Author affiliation(s)Freese and Nichols 1; City of Sugar Land 2;
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Feb 2024
DOI10.2175/193864718825159323
Volume / Issue
Content sourceUtility Management Conference
Word count11

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Ryan, Kendall. When Less is More: A Wastewater Treatment Consolidation Case Study. Water Environment Federation, 2024. Web. 19 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10101598CITANCHOR>.
Ryan, Kendall. When Less is More: A Wastewater Treatment Consolidation Case Study. Water Environment Federation, 2024. Accessed June 19, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10101598CITANCHOR.
Ryan, Kendall
When Less is More: A Wastewater Treatment Consolidation Case Study
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
February 14, 2024
June 19, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10101598CITANCHOR