Access Water | Optimizing Partial-Denitrification/Anammox (PdNA) Startup in IFAS system with...
lastID = -10118762
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Optimizing Partial-Denitrification/Anammox (PdNA) Startup in IFAS system with Low...
Optimizing Partial-Denitrification/Anammox (PdNA) Startup in IFAS system with Low TIN Discharge Targets
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2025-10-23 10:25:20 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-25 07:05:47 Adam Phillips Continuous release
  • 2025-09-16 15:57:36 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-04 05:52:44 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-02 21:06:57 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-02 16:14:43 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Optimizing Partial-Denitrification/Anammox (PdNA) Startup in IFAS system with Low...
Optimizing Partial-Denitrification/Anammox (PdNA) Startup in IFAS system with Low TIN Discharge Targets

Optimizing Partial-Denitrification/Anammox (PdNA) Startup in IFAS system with Low TIN Discharge Targets

Optimizing Partial-Denitrification/Anammox (PdNA) Startup in IFAS system with Low TIN Discharge Targets

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Optimizing Partial-Denitrification/Anammox (PdNA) Startup in IFAS system with Low...
Optimizing Partial-Denitrification/Anammox (PdNA) Startup in IFAS system with Low TIN Discharge Targets
Abstract
Introduction
To advance PdNA implementation, it is important to better understand PdNA startup strategies and timelines. Previous PdNA startups showed detection of anammox activity within three months for both methanol and glycerol as carbon sources, and MBBR, filters and IFAS configurations (Justin et al., 2022; Bachmann et al., 2024). At Blue Plains, PdNA integration is intended within the nitrification reactors, leaving a full denitrification polishing zone with MeOH downstream of the PdNA IFAS zone. This also means that the mixed liquor will maintain a full denitrification methylotroph population while PdN is targeted within the PdN zone. Previous work showed reduced PdN efficiencies under those conditions (Ladipo-Obasa et al., 2022) compared to only dosing MeOH with PdNA zone (Bachmann et al., 2024; Fofana et al., 2023) and also showed the importance of AnAOB presence to increase PdN efficiency by competing for nitrite (Ladipo-Obasa et al., 2022). The question remains however how one can startup a PdNA IFAS system when the MLSS maintains a healthy full denitrification methylotroph population and no initial AnAOB mass is present to compete for nitrite. The latter conditions are tested in this paper and the results of an IFAS PdNA system with MeOH for PdNA and downstream full denitrification is discussed.

Materials and Methods
A mainstream nitrogen removal pilot was operated at Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant. The schematic for the pilot is shown in Fig.1. The pilot was initially inoculated with nitrification-denitrification sludge from the full-scale biological nutrient removal system.

Results and Discussions

1. Permit Compliance and Nitrogen Removal
As shown in Table.1, the effluent TIN concentration averaged 2.59 ± 1.2mg N/L, successfully complying with the discharge permit requirements throughout the entire operational period (< 3 mg N/L).

2 PdN selection
PdN was successfully established within seven days and gradually improved until day 42, reaching an PdN efficiency of 20%, and confirmed by activity tests (Fig.2). This result aligns with expectation of observing lower PdN efficiencies with MeOH in the absence of AnAOB (Ladipo-Obasa et al., 2022). However, PdN efficiency declined to below 10% between days 70 and 112, which coincided with suboptimal methanol dosing. Operational constraints, such as understaffing, also hindered the maintenance of conditions essential for optimizing PdN selection during this period. Fluctuations in PdN efficiency persisted throughout the first 100 operational days due to limitation in nitrate removal rates not allowing for observable nitrite accumulation (Fig.2). This limitation was corrected on day 115, by increasing nitrate removal rates. Also, SRT was reduced from 28±0.4 days to 21±4 days, minimizing endogenous decay. Those actions led to establishing PdN efficiencies back to 20% (Fig. 2A). An improvement in PdN efficiency was observed after the enrichment of AnAOB up to PdN efficiencies of 44.03±10.01%, providing results close the previously reported PdN efficiencies (Ladipo-Obasa et al., 2022). This reinforced the critical role of AnAOB in enhancing PdN performance with methanol.

3 AnAOB enrichment
The first measurable AnAOB activity was detected after 90 days (Fig.2D). However, operational inefficiencies delayed significant progress until corrective actions were implemented after day 115 (discussed above) to allow for nitrite levels of 0.82 ± 0.51 mg N/L to be maintained (Fig.2C). To ensure sufficient substrate availability, ammonium concentrations were maintained at ≥2.3 mg N/L (Fig.2C). After establishing nitrite levels > 0.5 mg N/L from day 131 onwards it took until day 153 to see consistent ammonium removal of at least 0.55±0.11 mg N/L or 22.38±10.71 mg N/m2/d (Fig 2D). For that point on, ammonium removal increased exponentially and reached 2.23±0.57 mg N/L or 151.48±48.8 mg N/m2/d at the end of the experiment (Fig.2D).

The observed anammox growth rate was calculated as 0.036 ± 0.004 d-1, which aligns with those reported in polishing filters and MBBR systems using glycerol as a carbon source (Fofana et al., 2022; Schoepflin et al., 2022) but is lower than growth rates in suspended PdNA systems (Le et al., 2021). This discrepancy may be attributed to diffusion limitations in biofilm systems or competition with heterotrophic denitrifiers for nitrite (Stewart Philip, 2003). Additionally, this study confirms that it is important to generate a limited amount of nitrite accumulation together with ammonium availability to enrich AnAOB.

The timing of the first measurable AnAOB activity (day 90) aligns with prior findings (Bachmann et al., 2024; Kocamemi et al., 2018; Verma et al., 2021), further validating the feasibility of these approaches under mainstream PdNA conditions. we believe earlier optimization of nitrate removal to maintain nitrite could have reduced startup time. During this experiment about 60 days were lost.

Conclusion
This study successfully demonstrated AnAOB enrichment in PdNA IFAS system with downstream MeOH based polishing.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2025, held September 27-October 1, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.
Presentation time
08:30:00
09:00:00
Session time
08:30:00
10:00:00
SessionPdNA: Insights into Pilot and Full-scale Implementations
Session locationMcCormick Place, Chicago, Illinois, USA
TopicLiquid Stream Treatment - Nutrient Removal and Recovery
TopicLiquid Stream Treatment - Nutrient Removal and Recovery
Author(s)
ISLAM, MD AL SADIKUL, Ngo, Khoa Nam, Lee, Chengpeng, Hatcher, Jacob, Riffat, Rumana, Azam, Hossain, Wells, George, De Clippeleir, Haydee
Author(s)M. ISLAM1, K. Ngo1, C. Lee1, J. Hatcher1, R. Riffat4, H. Azam3, G. Wells2, H. De Clippeleir1
Author affiliation(s)DC Water and Sewer Authority1, Northwestern University2, University of the District of Columbia3, The George Washington University4
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2025
DOI10.2175/193864718825160028
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2025
Word count13

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Optimizing Partial-Denitrification/Anammox (PdNA) Startup in IFAS system with Low TIN Discharge Targets'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Optimizing Partial-Denitrification/Anammox (PdNA) Startup in IFAS system with Low...
Optimizing Partial-Denitrification/Anammox (PdNA) Startup in IFAS system with Low TIN Discharge Targets
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10118762
Get access
-10118762
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Optimizing Partial-Denitrification/Anammox (PdNA) Startup in IFAS system with Low TIN Discharge Targets'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Optimizing Partial-Denitrification/Anammox (PdNA) Startup in IFAS system with Low...
Optimizing Partial-Denitrification/Anammox (PdNA) Startup in IFAS system with Low TIN Discharge Targets
Abstract
Introduction
To advance PdNA implementation, it is important to better understand PdNA startup strategies and timelines. Previous PdNA startups showed detection of anammox activity within three months for both methanol and glycerol as carbon sources, and MBBR, filters and IFAS configurations (Justin et al., 2022; Bachmann et al., 2024). At Blue Plains, PdNA integration is intended within the nitrification reactors, leaving a full denitrification polishing zone with MeOH downstream of the PdNA IFAS zone. This also means that the mixed liquor will maintain a full denitrification methylotroph population while PdN is targeted within the PdN zone. Previous work showed reduced PdN efficiencies under those conditions (Ladipo-Obasa et al., 2022) compared to only dosing MeOH with PdNA zone (Bachmann et al., 2024; Fofana et al., 2023) and also showed the importance of AnAOB presence to increase PdN efficiency by competing for nitrite (Ladipo-Obasa et al., 2022). The question remains however how one can startup a PdNA IFAS system when the MLSS maintains a healthy full denitrification methylotroph population and no initial AnAOB mass is present to compete for nitrite. The latter conditions are tested in this paper and the results of an IFAS PdNA system with MeOH for PdNA and downstream full denitrification is discussed.

Materials and Methods
A mainstream nitrogen removal pilot was operated at Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant. The schematic for the pilot is shown in Fig.1. The pilot was initially inoculated with nitrification-denitrification sludge from the full-scale biological nutrient removal system.

Results and Discussions

1. Permit Compliance and Nitrogen Removal
As shown in Table.1, the effluent TIN concentration averaged 2.59 ± 1.2mg N/L, successfully complying with the discharge permit requirements throughout the entire operational period (< 3 mg N/L).

2 PdN selection
PdN was successfully established within seven days and gradually improved until day 42, reaching an PdN efficiency of 20%, and confirmed by activity tests (Fig.2). This result aligns with expectation of observing lower PdN efficiencies with MeOH in the absence of AnAOB (Ladipo-Obasa et al., 2022). However, PdN efficiency declined to below 10% between days 70 and 112, which coincided with suboptimal methanol dosing. Operational constraints, such as understaffing, also hindered the maintenance of conditions essential for optimizing PdN selection during this period. Fluctuations in PdN efficiency persisted throughout the first 100 operational days due to limitation in nitrate removal rates not allowing for observable nitrite accumulation (Fig.2). This limitation was corrected on day 115, by increasing nitrate removal rates. Also, SRT was reduced from 28±0.4 days to 21±4 days, minimizing endogenous decay. Those actions led to establishing PdN efficiencies back to 20% (Fig. 2A). An improvement in PdN efficiency was observed after the enrichment of AnAOB up to PdN efficiencies of 44.03±10.01%, providing results close the previously reported PdN efficiencies (Ladipo-Obasa et al., 2022). This reinforced the critical role of AnAOB in enhancing PdN performance with methanol.

3 AnAOB enrichment
The first measurable AnAOB activity was detected after 90 days (Fig.2D). However, operational inefficiencies delayed significant progress until corrective actions were implemented after day 115 (discussed above) to allow for nitrite levels of 0.82 ± 0.51 mg N/L to be maintained (Fig.2C). To ensure sufficient substrate availability, ammonium concentrations were maintained at ≥2.3 mg N/L (Fig.2C). After establishing nitrite levels > 0.5 mg N/L from day 131 onwards it took until day 153 to see consistent ammonium removal of at least 0.55±0.11 mg N/L or 22.38±10.71 mg N/m2/d (Fig 2D). For that point on, ammonium removal increased exponentially and reached 2.23±0.57 mg N/L or 151.48±48.8 mg N/m2/d at the end of the experiment (Fig.2D).

The observed anammox growth rate was calculated as 0.036 ± 0.004 d-1, which aligns with those reported in polishing filters and MBBR systems using glycerol as a carbon source (Fofana et al., 2022; Schoepflin et al., 2022) but is lower than growth rates in suspended PdNA systems (Le et al., 2021). This discrepancy may be attributed to diffusion limitations in biofilm systems or competition with heterotrophic denitrifiers for nitrite (Stewart Philip, 2003). Additionally, this study confirms that it is important to generate a limited amount of nitrite accumulation together with ammonium availability to enrich AnAOB.

The timing of the first measurable AnAOB activity (day 90) aligns with prior findings (Bachmann et al., 2024; Kocamemi et al., 2018; Verma et al., 2021), further validating the feasibility of these approaches under mainstream PdNA conditions. we believe earlier optimization of nitrate removal to maintain nitrite could have reduced startup time. During this experiment about 60 days were lost.

Conclusion
This study successfully demonstrated AnAOB enrichment in PdNA IFAS system with downstream MeOH based polishing.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2025, held September 27-October 1, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.
Presentation time
08:30:00
09:00:00
Session time
08:30:00
10:00:00
SessionPdNA: Insights into Pilot and Full-scale Implementations
Session locationMcCormick Place, Chicago, Illinois, USA
TopicLiquid Stream Treatment - Nutrient Removal and Recovery
TopicLiquid Stream Treatment - Nutrient Removal and Recovery
Author(s)
ISLAM, MD AL SADIKUL, Ngo, Khoa Nam, Lee, Chengpeng, Hatcher, Jacob, Riffat, Rumana, Azam, Hossain, Wells, George, De Clippeleir, Haydee
Author(s)M. ISLAM1, K. Ngo1, C. Lee1, J. Hatcher1, R. Riffat4, H. Azam3, G. Wells2, H. De Clippeleir1
Author affiliation(s)DC Water and Sewer Authority1, Northwestern University2, University of the District of Columbia3, The George Washington University4
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2025
DOI10.2175/193864718825160028
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2025
Word count13

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2025 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
ISLAM, MD AL SADIKUL. Optimizing Partial-Denitrification/Anammox (PdNA) Startup in IFAS system with Low TIN Discharge Targets. Water Environment Federation, 2025. Web. 6 Nov. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10118762CITANCHOR>.
ISLAM, MD AL SADIKUL. Optimizing Partial-Denitrification/Anammox (PdNA) Startup in IFAS system with Low TIN Discharge Targets. Water Environment Federation, 2025. Accessed November 6, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10118762CITANCHOR.
ISLAM, MD AL SADIKUL
Optimizing Partial-Denitrification/Anammox (PdNA) Startup in IFAS system with Low TIN Discharge Targets
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
October 1, 2025
November 6, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10118762CITANCHOR