Access Water | DAS in cold wastewater BNR to increase capacity at Gold Bar WWTP — myth...
lastID = -10118851
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: DAS in cold wastewater BNR to increase capacity at Gold Bar WWTP — myth or...
DAS in cold wastewater BNR to increase capacity at Gold Bar WWTP — myth or reality?
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2025-09-25 06:56:23 Adam Phillips Continuous release
  • 2025-09-16 16:00:37 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-04 05:42:21 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-02 21:09:18 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-02 16:16:27 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: DAS in cold wastewater BNR to increase capacity at Gold Bar WWTP — myth or...
DAS in cold wastewater BNR to increase capacity at Gold Bar WWTP — myth or reality?

DAS in cold wastewater BNR to increase capacity at Gold Bar WWTP — myth or reality?

DAS in cold wastewater BNR to increase capacity at Gold Bar WWTP — myth or reality?

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: DAS in cold wastewater BNR to increase capacity at Gold Bar WWTP — myth or...
DAS in cold wastewater BNR to increase capacity at Gold Bar WWTP — myth or reality?
Abstract
ABSTRACT: This paper presents two years of operational data at a large full-scale facility in cold climate for implementation and optimization of DAS.

BACKGROUND: The Gold Bar WWTP in Edmonton Canada, operated by EPCOR, treats average and peak flows of 78 and 264 MGD, respectively. Secondary treatment consists of 11 BNR bioreactors each with their own clarifier. Seasonal settleability constrains system capacity with poor settling (SVIs over 250 mL/g - Figure 1) occurring during the cold wastewater period (Figure 2) when spring run-off and wet weather events occur. With the WWTP nearing capacity and facility expansion constrained, DAS was identified as the preferred intensification approach. However, DAS is an emerging technology with site-specific results and limited full-scale applications for cold wastewater BNR facilities the size of Gold Bar WWTP. To address the risk, EPCOR proceeded with a full-scale DAS pilot on a single train. Installation and commissioning of the inDENSE™ hydrocyclone technology, as depicted in Figure 3, was completed in June 2023 and the technology validation program commenced. Methodology and findings from Year 1 of the full-scale trial has been presented (Hunter, et al. 2024). As per the Year 1 results, the test train average SVI during cold wastewater was 150 mL/g, consistently 50 to 90 mL/g lower than the control. Sludge settling speed analysis indicate significant improvement and potential capacity increase of 12.5 to 22.5%. However, stress testing was limited to a 10% increase before unforeseen circumstances were encountered. To confirm the capacity increase, EPCOR extended the full-scale pilot to address the unforeseen challenges and stress test the system in cold wastewater. The intent of this paper is to present the objectives, methodologies, and findings of Year 2 of the testing program.

METHODOLOGY: Year 2 of the testing program includes four phases: 1) Optimization, 2) Benchmarking, 3) Stress Testing, and 4) Wet Weather. Stress Testing includes a phased approach to increase the flow and load to the test and control train. Wet Weather operates at the newly defined treatment capacity during the extended spring run off period. Monitoring of parallel operation is completed with routine analysis and intensive testing as described in the Year 1 testing work. In addition, bioreactor sCOD profiles were added for Year 2 testing to indicate carbon utilization through the bioreactor. Monthly biomass microscopic analysis (imaging, morphology, filamentous) and particle size distributions (PSD) were completed on the test and control ML and the inDENSE™ underflow and overflow.

RESULTS: The first two phases of the Year 2 testing program have been completed. The Year 1 detrimental challenges were addressed including:
- Challenging SRT control. With high RAS solids concentrations and long SRTs, the wastage rate reduced below pump system limits. Intermittent feeding was implemented but SRT control was inconsistent. Dilution water was incorporated into the inDENSE™ feed sludge line.
- Unconditioned sludge transfer. When a parallel secondary treatment train was removed from service, a significant portion biomass was transferred to the test train and negatively impacted settleability and clarifier blanket stability. New dewatering pumping systems were employed.

Process optimization changes included:
- Reduced RAS rates were employed in Year 1 of testing. With notable DAS performance improvements including increased RAS compaction, reduction in nitrate load to the anaerobic zone, and improved plug flow conditions, the Year 2 testing program continued with reduced RAS rates.
- Intermittent mixing of the first two unaerated zones was implemented in Year 1 of testing to improve biological phosphorus removal by decoupling the anaerobic SRT and providing inline fermentation. Without notable improvements to phosphate release, the zones were returned to continuous mixing for Year 2 to target a higher F/M ratio.
- Partial swing zone aeration was implemented in Year 2 of testing. The second anoxic zone has mixers and two aeration grids but is typically mix only. By aerating the second grid, the aerobic SRT increases for more stable nitrification and enhanced feast to famine. In addition, partial nitrification and free ammonia have been correlated to the growth of M. Parvicella which is the dominant cold wastewater filament at the facility.
- High DO concentration in the first aerobic zone was implemented in Year 2 of testing to mitigate M. Parvicella growth. High DO concentrations in the swing zone target immediate oxidization of residual carbon following the biological phosphorus and denitrification processes.
- Reduced NMLR rates were employed in Year 2 of testing to improve plug flow conditions and limit continuous anoxic/aerobic sequencing. NMLR rates were reduced by 50% to match average primary effluent rates. The settleability results for Year 2 (Figure 4) with a notable SVI reduction of 30 to 80 mL/g (15 to 45%). Microscopic imaging completed in Dec 2024 (Figure 5), clearly reveals the presence of granules in the test train and an abundance in the inDENSE™ underflow. PSD analysis confirms the microscopic imaging results.

SUMMARY: Year 2 results clearly demonstrate that the use of a hydrocyclone and biological selection result in denser sludge with increased settling speeds. With promising results, the Year 2 Stress Testing is targeting 20% capacity at 12 C.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2025, held September 27-October 1, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.
Presentation time
15:40:00
15:50:00
Session time
15:30:00
17:00:00
SessionDensified Activated Sludge Full Scale Performance and Optimization
Session locationMcCormick Place, Chicago, Illinois, USA
TopicLiquid Stream Treatment - Nutrient Removal and Recovery
TopicLiquid Stream Treatment - Nutrient Removal and Recovery
Author(s)
Hunter, Mike, Xheko, Julian, Opyr, Luke, Regmi, Pusker, Molla, Saif, Shu, Trevor, Sanche, Dagny, Katyal, Ranveer, Murthy, Sudhir
Author(s)M. Hunter1, J. Xheko1, L. Opyr1, P. Regmi1, S. Molla2, T. Shu2, D. Sanche2, R. Katyal2, S. Murthy3
Author affiliation(s)Stantec Inc.1, EPCOR Water Services2, NEWhub Water Corporation3
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep 2025
DOI10.2175/193864718825160117
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2025
Word count16

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'DAS in cold wastewater BNR to increase capacity at Gold Bar WWTP — myth or reality?'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: DAS in cold wastewater BNR to increase capacity at Gold Bar WWTP — myth or...
DAS in cold wastewater BNR to increase capacity at Gold Bar WWTP — myth or reality?
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10118851
Get access
-10118851
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'DAS in cold wastewater BNR to increase capacity at Gold Bar WWTP — myth or reality?'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: DAS in cold wastewater BNR to increase capacity at Gold Bar WWTP — myth or...
DAS in cold wastewater BNR to increase capacity at Gold Bar WWTP — myth or reality?
Abstract
ABSTRACT: This paper presents two years of operational data at a large full-scale facility in cold climate for implementation and optimization of DAS.

BACKGROUND: The Gold Bar WWTP in Edmonton Canada, operated by EPCOR, treats average and peak flows of 78 and 264 MGD, respectively. Secondary treatment consists of 11 BNR bioreactors each with their own clarifier. Seasonal settleability constrains system capacity with poor settling (SVIs over 250 mL/g - Figure 1) occurring during the cold wastewater period (Figure 2) when spring run-off and wet weather events occur. With the WWTP nearing capacity and facility expansion constrained, DAS was identified as the preferred intensification approach. However, DAS is an emerging technology with site-specific results and limited full-scale applications for cold wastewater BNR facilities the size of Gold Bar WWTP. To address the risk, EPCOR proceeded with a full-scale DAS pilot on a single train. Installation and commissioning of the inDENSE™ hydrocyclone technology, as depicted in Figure 3, was completed in June 2023 and the technology validation program commenced. Methodology and findings from Year 1 of the full-scale trial has been presented (Hunter, et al. 2024). As per the Year 1 results, the test train average SVI during cold wastewater was 150 mL/g, consistently 50 to 90 mL/g lower than the control. Sludge settling speed analysis indicate significant improvement and potential capacity increase of 12.5 to 22.5%. However, stress testing was limited to a 10% increase before unforeseen circumstances were encountered. To confirm the capacity increase, EPCOR extended the full-scale pilot to address the unforeseen challenges and stress test the system in cold wastewater. The intent of this paper is to present the objectives, methodologies, and findings of Year 2 of the testing program.

METHODOLOGY: Year 2 of the testing program includes four phases: 1) Optimization, 2) Benchmarking, 3) Stress Testing, and 4) Wet Weather. Stress Testing includes a phased approach to increase the flow and load to the test and control train. Wet Weather operates at the newly defined treatment capacity during the extended spring run off period. Monitoring of parallel operation is completed with routine analysis and intensive testing as described in the Year 1 testing work. In addition, bioreactor sCOD profiles were added for Year 2 testing to indicate carbon utilization through the bioreactor. Monthly biomass microscopic analysis (imaging, morphology, filamentous) and particle size distributions (PSD) were completed on the test and control ML and the inDENSE™ underflow and overflow.

RESULTS: The first two phases of the Year 2 testing program have been completed. The Year 1 detrimental challenges were addressed including:
- Challenging SRT control. With high RAS solids concentrations and long SRTs, the wastage rate reduced below pump system limits. Intermittent feeding was implemented but SRT control was inconsistent. Dilution water was incorporated into the inDENSE™ feed sludge line.
- Unconditioned sludge transfer. When a parallel secondary treatment train was removed from service, a significant portion biomass was transferred to the test train and negatively impacted settleability and clarifier blanket stability. New dewatering pumping systems were employed.

Process optimization changes included:
- Reduced RAS rates were employed in Year 1 of testing. With notable DAS performance improvements including increased RAS compaction, reduction in nitrate load to the anaerobic zone, and improved plug flow conditions, the Year 2 testing program continued with reduced RAS rates.
- Intermittent mixing of the first two unaerated zones was implemented in Year 1 of testing to improve biological phosphorus removal by decoupling the anaerobic SRT and providing inline fermentation. Without notable improvements to phosphate release, the zones were returned to continuous mixing for Year 2 to target a higher F/M ratio.
- Partial swing zone aeration was implemented in Year 2 of testing. The second anoxic zone has mixers and two aeration grids but is typically mix only. By aerating the second grid, the aerobic SRT increases for more stable nitrification and enhanced feast to famine. In addition, partial nitrification and free ammonia have been correlated to the growth of M. Parvicella which is the dominant cold wastewater filament at the facility.
- High DO concentration in the first aerobic zone was implemented in Year 2 of testing to mitigate M. Parvicella growth. High DO concentrations in the swing zone target immediate oxidization of residual carbon following the biological phosphorus and denitrification processes.
- Reduced NMLR rates were employed in Year 2 of testing to improve plug flow conditions and limit continuous anoxic/aerobic sequencing. NMLR rates were reduced by 50% to match average primary effluent rates. The settleability results for Year 2 (Figure 4) with a notable SVI reduction of 30 to 80 mL/g (15 to 45%). Microscopic imaging completed in Dec 2024 (Figure 5), clearly reveals the presence of granules in the test train and an abundance in the inDENSE™ underflow. PSD analysis confirms the microscopic imaging results.

SUMMARY: Year 2 results clearly demonstrate that the use of a hydrocyclone and biological selection result in denser sludge with increased settling speeds. With promising results, the Year 2 Stress Testing is targeting 20% capacity at 12 C.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2025, held September 27-October 1, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.
Presentation time
15:40:00
15:50:00
Session time
15:30:00
17:00:00
SessionDensified Activated Sludge Full Scale Performance and Optimization
Session locationMcCormick Place, Chicago, Illinois, USA
TopicLiquid Stream Treatment - Nutrient Removal and Recovery
TopicLiquid Stream Treatment - Nutrient Removal and Recovery
Author(s)
Hunter, Mike, Xheko, Julian, Opyr, Luke, Regmi, Pusker, Molla, Saif, Shu, Trevor, Sanche, Dagny, Katyal, Ranveer, Murthy, Sudhir
Author(s)M. Hunter1, J. Xheko1, L. Opyr1, P. Regmi1, S. Molla2, T. Shu2, D. Sanche2, R. Katyal2, S. Murthy3
Author affiliation(s)Stantec Inc.1, EPCOR Water Services2, NEWhub Water Corporation3
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep 2025
DOI10.2175/193864718825160117
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2025
Word count16

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2025 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Hunter, Mike. DAS in cold wastewater BNR to increase capacity at Gold Bar WWTP — myth or reality?. Water Environment Federation, 2025. Web. 16 Oct. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10118851CITANCHOR>.
Hunter, Mike. DAS in cold wastewater BNR to increase capacity at Gold Bar WWTP — myth or reality?. Water Environment Federation, 2025. Accessed October 16, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10118851CITANCHOR.
Hunter, Mike
DAS in cold wastewater BNR to increase capacity at Gold Bar WWTP — myth or reality?
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
September 30, 2025
October 16, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10118851CITANCHOR