Access Water | Genetic Analysis in Treatment Process Monitoring
lastID = -10118873
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Genetic Analysis in Treatment Process Monitoring
Genetic Analysis in Treatment Process Monitoring
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2025-09-25 06:59:57 Adam Phillips Continuous release
  • 2025-09-16 16:01:17 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-16 14:50:54 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-16 14:11:52 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-16 13:57:52 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-16 10:49:10 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-04 05:46:10 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-02 21:09:53 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-02 16:16:56 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Genetic Analysis in Treatment Process Monitoring
Genetic Analysis in Treatment Process Monitoring

Genetic Analysis in Treatment Process Monitoring

Genetic Analysis in Treatment Process Monitoring

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Genetic Analysis in Treatment Process Monitoring
Genetic Analysis in Treatment Process Monitoring
Abstract
Interest in the use of genetic and genomic data for biological wastewater treatment process monitoring has risen rapidly, evidenced by the recent Water Research Foundation (WRF) request for proposals on the topic (WRF 5291). This presentation will serve as a mini 101 course on genetics and genomics for wastewater professionals, offering accessible information on relevant background, potential applications, types of tools, limitations, biomarker assay design, and study design considerations. 'Genetic tools' refers to technologies based on DNA and other nucleic acids. There are two main types, known as targeted or untargeted methods. Targeted methods typically use PCR (polymerase chain reaction) to identify a specific gene or organism of interest. Targeted genetic tools commonly used in wastewater process monitoring applications include quantitative or digital PCR (qPCR or dPCR). Nontargeted methods employ DNA sequencing, which refers to laboratory and computational methods which determine the order of the DNA building blocks; essentially spelling out the genetic code. A commonly used nontargeted method is metagenomic sequencing. (The 'metagenome' refers to all of the DNA present in a sample; see Figure 1). Nontargeted methods yield information on the composition of the microbial community and its functional potential but are not absolutely quantitative. Each type of method has its own set of advantages and limitations (Table 1). Targeted methods are highly sensitive and specific, and can provide highly accurate quantitative data, but are limited in the amount of information they can provide — typically only a single gene or organism out of thousands of relevant potential targets. Care must be exercised in choosing an appropriate target for monitoring, as well as in interpreting the results. Nontargeted methods, in contrast, provide a wealth of information; however, advanced expertise and substantial computing power is required to parse hundreds of gigabytes of data into actionable conclusions. Additionally, application of the wrong genetic technique or interpretation of genetic data without proper data context can greatly complicate or confound conclusions. Genetic tools are an attractive option for wastewater treatment process monitoring because they provide a look 'under the hood' at what is essentially a black box when it comes to biological treatment processes, particularly biological nutrient removal (BNR). These tools can offer information on the health and functioning of the microbiome, as well as insights into complex metabolic systems which can in turn inform process control. However, the field is still emerging, and many research questions remain regarding which targets are appropriate and informative; whether it's possible to develop 'universal' targets that could be widely used; and how the data should be interpreted. Clean Water Services is leading one such research effort, focused on developing biomarkers for biological phosphorus removal (BPR) process stability (WRF 5273). This presentation will describe the procedure used to develop and test these biomarkers as a case study in the application of both targeted and untargeted genetic technologies (Figure 2). Briefly, metagenomic and metatranscriptomic sequencing was performed to thoroughly characterize the aeration basin microbiomes. From these data, key genes were identified which are differentially expressed during stable versus unstable BPR conditions. These genes were used to design biomarkers which are measured with reverse transcription droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR). The biomarker assays were tested virtually (in silico) and validated in the laboratory prior to pilot deployment. Lastly, we will touch on the importance of robust study design when employing genetic tools. Too often, a utility will sequence a low number of samples (n<10) and draw broad conclusions from those results. Unfortunately, this can lead to spurious conclusions and a fundamental misunderstanding of the system. We will offer guidance on robust study design for genetic analyses, and suggestions for interpretation of results. This presentation will describe the different types of genetic tools available, summarize their advantages and disadvantages for biological nutrient removal applications and give an overview of the process used to develop and test biomarker targets for WRF project 5273. The goal is to improve communication between molecular biologists and process engineers to improve collaboration on the beneficial application of genetic tools to improve BNR understanding and operation.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2025, held September 27-October 1, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.
Presentation time
15:30:00
16:00:00
Session time
15:30:00
17:00:00
SessionBringing Bugs into Focus: Microbial and Genetic Tools for Optimizing WRRF Performance
Session locationMcCormick Place, Chicago, Illinois, USA
TopicResearch
TopicResearch
Author(s)
Layton, Blythe, Golda, Rachel, Coats, Erik, Menniti, Adrienne, Schauer, Peter
Author(s)B. Layton1, R. Golda1, E. Coats, A. Menniti1, P. Schauer
Author affiliation(s)Clean Water Services1, DC Water and Sewer Authority2
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep 2025
DOI10.2175/193864718825160139
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2025
Word count7

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Genetic Analysis in Treatment Process Monitoring'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Genetic Analysis in Treatment Process Monitoring
Genetic Analysis in Treatment Process Monitoring
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10118873
Get access
-10118873
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Genetic Analysis in Treatment Process Monitoring'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Genetic Analysis in Treatment Process Monitoring
Genetic Analysis in Treatment Process Monitoring
Abstract
Interest in the use of genetic and genomic data for biological wastewater treatment process monitoring has risen rapidly, evidenced by the recent Water Research Foundation (WRF) request for proposals on the topic (WRF 5291). This presentation will serve as a mini 101 course on genetics and genomics for wastewater professionals, offering accessible information on relevant background, potential applications, types of tools, limitations, biomarker assay design, and study design considerations. 'Genetic tools' refers to technologies based on DNA and other nucleic acids. There are two main types, known as targeted or untargeted methods. Targeted methods typically use PCR (polymerase chain reaction) to identify a specific gene or organism of interest. Targeted genetic tools commonly used in wastewater process monitoring applications include quantitative or digital PCR (qPCR or dPCR). Nontargeted methods employ DNA sequencing, which refers to laboratory and computational methods which determine the order of the DNA building blocks; essentially spelling out the genetic code. A commonly used nontargeted method is metagenomic sequencing. (The 'metagenome' refers to all of the DNA present in a sample; see Figure 1). Nontargeted methods yield information on the composition of the microbial community and its functional potential but are not absolutely quantitative. Each type of method has its own set of advantages and limitations (Table 1). Targeted methods are highly sensitive and specific, and can provide highly accurate quantitative data, but are limited in the amount of information they can provide — typically only a single gene or organism out of thousands of relevant potential targets. Care must be exercised in choosing an appropriate target for monitoring, as well as in interpreting the results. Nontargeted methods, in contrast, provide a wealth of information; however, advanced expertise and substantial computing power is required to parse hundreds of gigabytes of data into actionable conclusions. Additionally, application of the wrong genetic technique or interpretation of genetic data without proper data context can greatly complicate or confound conclusions. Genetic tools are an attractive option for wastewater treatment process monitoring because they provide a look 'under the hood' at what is essentially a black box when it comes to biological treatment processes, particularly biological nutrient removal (BNR). These tools can offer information on the health and functioning of the microbiome, as well as insights into complex metabolic systems which can in turn inform process control. However, the field is still emerging, and many research questions remain regarding which targets are appropriate and informative; whether it's possible to develop 'universal' targets that could be widely used; and how the data should be interpreted. Clean Water Services is leading one such research effort, focused on developing biomarkers for biological phosphorus removal (BPR) process stability (WRF 5273). This presentation will describe the procedure used to develop and test these biomarkers as a case study in the application of both targeted and untargeted genetic technologies (Figure 2). Briefly, metagenomic and metatranscriptomic sequencing was performed to thoroughly characterize the aeration basin microbiomes. From these data, key genes were identified which are differentially expressed during stable versus unstable BPR conditions. These genes were used to design biomarkers which are measured with reverse transcription droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR). The biomarker assays were tested virtually (in silico) and validated in the laboratory prior to pilot deployment. Lastly, we will touch on the importance of robust study design when employing genetic tools. Too often, a utility will sequence a low number of samples (n<10) and draw broad conclusions from those results. Unfortunately, this can lead to spurious conclusions and a fundamental misunderstanding of the system. We will offer guidance on robust study design for genetic analyses, and suggestions for interpretation of results. This presentation will describe the different types of genetic tools available, summarize their advantages and disadvantages for biological nutrient removal applications and give an overview of the process used to develop and test biomarker targets for WRF project 5273. The goal is to improve communication between molecular biologists and process engineers to improve collaboration on the beneficial application of genetic tools to improve BNR understanding and operation.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2025, held September 27-October 1, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.
Presentation time
15:30:00
16:00:00
Session time
15:30:00
17:00:00
SessionBringing Bugs into Focus: Microbial and Genetic Tools for Optimizing WRRF Performance
Session locationMcCormick Place, Chicago, Illinois, USA
TopicResearch
TopicResearch
Author(s)
Layton, Blythe, Golda, Rachel, Coats, Erik, Menniti, Adrienne, Schauer, Peter
Author(s)B. Layton1, R. Golda1, E. Coats, A. Menniti1, P. Schauer
Author affiliation(s)Clean Water Services1, DC Water and Sewer Authority2
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep 2025
DOI10.2175/193864718825160139
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2025
Word count7

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2025 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Layton, Blythe. Genetic Analysis in Treatment Process Monitoring. Water Environment Federation, 2025. Web. 17 Oct. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10118873CITANCHOR>.
Layton, Blythe. Genetic Analysis in Treatment Process Monitoring. Water Environment Federation, 2025. Accessed October 17, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10118873CITANCHOR.
Layton, Blythe
Genetic Analysis in Treatment Process Monitoring
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
September 29, 2025
October 17, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10118873CITANCHOR