Access Water | Full-Scale N2O Modelling For Advanced Mitigation
lastID = -10118881
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Full-Scale N2O Modelling For Advanced Mitigation
Full-Scale N2O Modelling For Advanced Mitigation
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2025-10-23 10:22:35 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-25 06:59:50 Adam Phillips Continuous release
  • 2025-09-16 16:01:42 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-04 05:46:00 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-02 21:10:19 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-02 16:17:06 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Full-Scale N2O Modelling For Advanced Mitigation
Full-Scale N2O Modelling For Advanced Mitigation

Full-Scale N2O Modelling For Advanced Mitigation

Full-Scale N2O Modelling For Advanced Mitigation

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Full-Scale N2O Modelling For Advanced Mitigation
Full-Scale N2O Modelling For Advanced Mitigation
Abstract
Abstract: Effluent quality, performance and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions of the water resource recovery facility of Hessenpoort (the Netherlands) were investigated using an advanced model-based methodology. Mechanistic activated sludge modelling with N2O kinetics was integrated with Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to design a calibrated and validated CFD-informed dynamic model. The model unraveled the root causes of N2O production and allowed to explore the long-term implications of critical plant changes.

INTRODUCTION
Design and operation of water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) is becoming a balancing act AMONG effluent requirements, plant efficiency, and minimizing nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (the '3Es').
N2O emissions from WRRFs can be minimized implementing advanced operational strategies that promote efficient nitrogen removal while minimizing N2O production. The complexity of N2O formation in bioreactors makes it difficult to use general guidelines for measurements and mitigation. While direct onsite monitoring provides estimates of emissions and their dynamics, major limitations are a lack of root cause understanding and limited spatial insights. Integrating sensors, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), and biokinetic modeling enables the development of tailored and effective mitigation strategies along with industry-wide learning.
The Dutch water authority Waterschap Drents Overijsselse Delta (WDODelta) seeked to understand and mitigate N2O emissions at the Hessenpoort WRRF. As part of a larger hydrogen project, in which pure oxygen (PO) is being generated, WDODelta was also investigating the use of pure oxygen aeration given its potential in sensibly reducing N2O stripping, but with rather unknown implications on the biomass (e.g. lowering of pH).
Mechanistic models are well established in the biological water treatment sector and can be used to accelerate decisions on bioreactors' operation as well as N2O sensor placement and N2O mitigation itself.
In this work, a mechanistic activated sludge model integrated with CFD and used to design a CFD-informed dynamic model able to run long dynamic simulations with very detailed representation of the bioreactor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS The biological activity was modelled via the ASM-N2O developed by AM-Team from the available literature (inter alia: Bellandi, 2018, Guo, 2014; Hiatt and Grady, 2008; Peng et al., 2015; Sperandio et al., 2016) (Figure 1).
The hydraulic model used for the CFD simulations was a 2-phase Eulerian model (liquid-air) in which the ASM-N2O was integrated (Figure 2).
The bioreactor consisted of 5 concentric rings (R1-5; Figure 3) operated in a carrousel configuration and interconnected by overflows and 3 recirculatios. The return activated sludge (RAS) and influent entered in R1.

The influent dynamics were monitored with high frequency (1 min) sensors and an influent fractionation of COD (total and soluble), BOD, N species, and P species was performed hourly for 48h to accurately observe influent dynamics. N2O concentrations in the liquid phase (Unisense, Denmark) were applied in R5 (aerobic) and R3 (anoxic). Sensors were regularly calibrated and maintained to assure good data quality.

RESULTS
The CFD integration with the biokinetic ASM-N2O model allowed to run several scenarios among which the use of PO in R4 and R5, which showed a potential reduction of 75 % in N2O emissions. The creation of a CFD-informed tool allowed to run very detailed simulations resembling very closely the N species in the tank (Figure 4). Spatial representation of the bioreactor is a very essential step for being able to accurately predict N2O measurements.
The CFD-biokinetic integration was essential to visualize and understand the gradients in N2O formation, consumption, and transport at different operating conditions (Figure 5, left). Local N2O hotspots in different zones (indicated in red) were the root causes of this WRRFs N2O emissions. Each hotspot was caused by different conditions (e.g. local DO and ammonia gradients). In zones where complete denitrification could take place, N2O consumption could happen (indicated in blue). As a result of the spatial provided to the dynamic model, both in terms of hydrodynamics and influent characterization, it was possible to predict the measured N2O dynamics with the CFD-informed dynamic model (Figure 5, right).

CONCLUSIONS
To assess the current plant performance an initial plant screening was performed using an advanced 3D ASM-N2O model. The reactor's hydrodynamic performance, effluent quality, N2O emissions and plant efficiency were assessed.
The use of PO to limit N2O stripping was simulated indicating the potential of pure oxygen in carbon footprint minimization. Onsite PO tests are currently ongoing.
#The 3D CFD results were used to develop a highly performing dynamic model to be used for future 'what-if' scenario testing. The CFD-informed dynamic model was able to capture carbon and nitrogen dynamics and N2O emissions and is now ready for plant maximisation/modification. Adequate influent data and spatial information were deemed necessary for satisfying N2O predictions.
The dynamic model is now used to test numerous operational and design scenarios for holistic plant optimisation (3E: effluent, efficiency and emissions) and guidance of integration and control in the use of pure oxygen.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2025, held September 27-October 1, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.
Presentation time
14:00:00
14:15:00
Session time
13:30:00
15:00:00
SessionDecarbonizing Water: N2O Modeling - From Low DO to HPO
Session locationMcCormick Place, Chicago, Illinois, USA
TopicClimate Change Adaptation and Resilience
TopicClimate Change Adaptation and Resilience
Author(s)
Bellandi, Giacomo, Muoio, Roberta, Flameling, Tony, Gaillard, Amor, Audenaert, Wim, Rehman, Usman
Author(s)G. Bellandi1, R. Muoio1, T. Flameling2, A. Gaillard3, W. Audenaert1, U. Rehman1
Author affiliation(s)AM-Team1, Waterschap Rijn en Ijssel2, Waterschap Drents Overijsselse Delta3, Jacobs Engineering Headquarters Office4
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep 2025
DOI10.2175/193864718825160147
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2025
Word count7

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Full-Scale N2O Modelling For Advanced Mitigation'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Full-Scale N2O Modelling For Advanced Mitigation
Full-Scale N2O Modelling For Advanced Mitigation
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10118881
Get access
-10118881
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Full-Scale N2O Modelling For Advanced Mitigation'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Full-Scale N2O Modelling For Advanced Mitigation
Full-Scale N2O Modelling For Advanced Mitigation
Abstract
Abstract: Effluent quality, performance and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions of the water resource recovery facility of Hessenpoort (the Netherlands) were investigated using an advanced model-based methodology. Mechanistic activated sludge modelling with N2O kinetics was integrated with Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to design a calibrated and validated CFD-informed dynamic model. The model unraveled the root causes of N2O production and allowed to explore the long-term implications of critical plant changes.

INTRODUCTION
Design and operation of water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) is becoming a balancing act AMONG effluent requirements, plant efficiency, and minimizing nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (the '3Es').
N2O emissions from WRRFs can be minimized implementing advanced operational strategies that promote efficient nitrogen removal while minimizing N2O production. The complexity of N2O formation in bioreactors makes it difficult to use general guidelines for measurements and mitigation. While direct onsite monitoring provides estimates of emissions and their dynamics, major limitations are a lack of root cause understanding and limited spatial insights. Integrating sensors, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), and biokinetic modeling enables the development of tailored and effective mitigation strategies along with industry-wide learning.
The Dutch water authority Waterschap Drents Overijsselse Delta (WDODelta) seeked to understand and mitigate N2O emissions at the Hessenpoort WRRF. As part of a larger hydrogen project, in which pure oxygen (PO) is being generated, WDODelta was also investigating the use of pure oxygen aeration given its potential in sensibly reducing N2O stripping, but with rather unknown implications on the biomass (e.g. lowering of pH).
Mechanistic models are well established in the biological water treatment sector and can be used to accelerate decisions on bioreactors' operation as well as N2O sensor placement and N2O mitigation itself.
In this work, a mechanistic activated sludge model integrated with CFD and used to design a CFD-informed dynamic model able to run long dynamic simulations with very detailed representation of the bioreactor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS The biological activity was modelled via the ASM-N2O developed by AM-Team from the available literature (inter alia: Bellandi, 2018, Guo, 2014; Hiatt and Grady, 2008; Peng et al., 2015; Sperandio et al., 2016) (Figure 1).
The hydraulic model used for the CFD simulations was a 2-phase Eulerian model (liquid-air) in which the ASM-N2O was integrated (Figure 2).
The bioreactor consisted of 5 concentric rings (R1-5; Figure 3) operated in a carrousel configuration and interconnected by overflows and 3 recirculatios. The return activated sludge (RAS) and influent entered in R1.

The influent dynamics were monitored with high frequency (1 min) sensors and an influent fractionation of COD (total and soluble), BOD, N species, and P species was performed hourly for 48h to accurately observe influent dynamics. N2O concentrations in the liquid phase (Unisense, Denmark) were applied in R5 (aerobic) and R3 (anoxic). Sensors were regularly calibrated and maintained to assure good data quality.

RESULTS
The CFD integration with the biokinetic ASM-N2O model allowed to run several scenarios among which the use of PO in R4 and R5, which showed a potential reduction of 75 % in N2O emissions. The creation of a CFD-informed tool allowed to run very detailed simulations resembling very closely the N species in the tank (Figure 4). Spatial representation of the bioreactor is a very essential step for being able to accurately predict N2O measurements.
The CFD-biokinetic integration was essential to visualize and understand the gradients in N2O formation, consumption, and transport at different operating conditions (Figure 5, left). Local N2O hotspots in different zones (indicated in red) were the root causes of this WRRFs N2O emissions. Each hotspot was caused by different conditions (e.g. local DO and ammonia gradients). In zones where complete denitrification could take place, N2O consumption could happen (indicated in blue). As a result of the spatial provided to the dynamic model, both in terms of hydrodynamics and influent characterization, it was possible to predict the measured N2O dynamics with the CFD-informed dynamic model (Figure 5, right).

CONCLUSIONS
To assess the current plant performance an initial plant screening was performed using an advanced 3D ASM-N2O model. The reactor's hydrodynamic performance, effluent quality, N2O emissions and plant efficiency were assessed.
The use of PO to limit N2O stripping was simulated indicating the potential of pure oxygen in carbon footprint minimization. Onsite PO tests are currently ongoing.
#The 3D CFD results were used to develop a highly performing dynamic model to be used for future 'what-if' scenario testing. The CFD-informed dynamic model was able to capture carbon and nitrogen dynamics and N2O emissions and is now ready for plant maximisation/modification. Adequate influent data and spatial information were deemed necessary for satisfying N2O predictions.
The dynamic model is now used to test numerous operational and design scenarios for holistic plant optimisation (3E: effluent, efficiency and emissions) and guidance of integration and control in the use of pure oxygen.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2025, held September 27-October 1, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.
Presentation time
14:00:00
14:15:00
Session time
13:30:00
15:00:00
SessionDecarbonizing Water: N2O Modeling - From Low DO to HPO
Session locationMcCormick Place, Chicago, Illinois, USA
TopicClimate Change Adaptation and Resilience
TopicClimate Change Adaptation and Resilience
Author(s)
Bellandi, Giacomo, Muoio, Roberta, Flameling, Tony, Gaillard, Amor, Audenaert, Wim, Rehman, Usman
Author(s)G. Bellandi1, R. Muoio1, T. Flameling2, A. Gaillard3, W. Audenaert1, U. Rehman1
Author affiliation(s)AM-Team1, Waterschap Rijn en Ijssel2, Waterschap Drents Overijsselse Delta3, Jacobs Engineering Headquarters Office4
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep 2025
DOI10.2175/193864718825160147
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2025
Word count7

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2025 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Bellandi, Giacomo. Full-Scale N2O Modelling For Advanced Mitigation. Water Environment Federation, 2025. Web. 25 Oct. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10118881CITANCHOR>.
Bellandi, Giacomo. Full-Scale N2O Modelling For Advanced Mitigation. Water Environment Federation, 2025. Accessed October 25, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10118881CITANCHOR.
Bellandi, Giacomo
Full-Scale N2O Modelling For Advanced Mitigation
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
September 30, 2025
October 25, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10118881CITANCHOR