Access Water | Comparative Evaluation of Chlorine, Performic Acid, and Peracetic Acid...
lastID = -10128205
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Comparative Evaluation of Chlorine, Performic Acid, and Peracetic Acid Disinfection...
Comparative Evaluation of Chlorine, Performic Acid, and Peracetic Acid Disinfection Kinetics Using Fixed‑Dose and iCT‑Paced Control
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2026-09-25 14:53:50 Chris Lewis Continuous release
  • 2026-09-11 10:00:31 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Comparative Evaluation of Chlorine, Performic Acid, and Peracetic Acid Disinfection...
Comparative Evaluation of Chlorine, Performic Acid, and Peracetic Acid Disinfection Kinetics Using Fixed‑Dose and iCT‑Paced Control

Comparative Evaluation of Chlorine, Performic Acid, and Peracetic Acid Disinfection Kinetics Using Fixed‑Dose and iCT‑Paced Control

Comparative Evaluation of Chlorine, Performic Acid, and Peracetic Acid Disinfection Kinetics Using Fixed‑Dose and iCT‑Paced Control

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Comparative Evaluation of Chlorine, Performic Acid, and Peracetic Acid Disinfection...
Comparative Evaluation of Chlorine, Performic Acid, and Peracetic Acid Disinfection Kinetics Using Fixed‑Dose and iCT‑Paced Control
Abstract
1. Introduction Wastewater disinfection is a critical barrier for protecting public health, yet its performance is strongly influenced by disinfectant chemistry, wastewater matrix characteristics, and operational variability. Sodium hypochlorite remains the most common disinfectant in North America, but increasing interest in alternatives such as performic acid (PFA) and peracetic acid (PAA) has emerged due to concerns about chlorinated by products, evolving regulatory expectations, and the need for more resilient disinfection strategies. Despite this growing interest, comparative data evaluating how these disinfectants differ in their disinfection kinetics, CT requirements, and reactivity under real secondary effluent conditions remain limited. The objective of this study was to generate a comprehensive comparison of sodium hypochlorite, PFA, and PAA by characterizing their pathogen inactivation performance, disinfectant specific CT needs, and kinetic behavior, including demand and decay. A second objective was to evaluate how differences in disinfectant reactivity influence the consistency of disinfection performance when applied under variable wastewater conditions. By establishing clear kinetic benchmarks and examining their implications for operational control, the study aims to provide utilities with data driven guidance for selecting and optimizing disinfectants in modern wastewater treatment applications. 2. Methods This study used a combined bench scale and onsite approach to characterize disinfectant kinetics under both controlled and real world conditions. Bench scale testing with field collected wastewater was used to determine disinfectant specific CT values for reducing fecal coliform and enterococci, and to quantify inactivation kinetics, demand, and decay under controlled dosages. Onsite evaluation was carried out in Mississauga, Ontario, with a 32 L slip stream batch reactor operated in fixed dose mode (3 mg/L) and adaptive iCT paced dosing mode.

• Fixed dose operation (3 mg/L), which held the applied dose constant and allowed observation of natural variability in demand, decay, and residual behavior.

• iCT paced operation, which continuously adjusted disinfectant dosing in real time to meet the CT target, compensating for changes in water quality, demand, and decay

Residual disinfectant was measured every 2.5 minutes to calculate instantaneous demand and first order decay. Pathogen samples and residual profiles were collected across sequential batch cycles to assess how disinfectant reactivity such as demand, decay, and CT, translated into actual disinfection performance. Together, this integrated approach enabled a comprehensive comparison of disinfectant behavior across both conventional fixed dose control and real time iCT paced operation. 3. Results and Discussion Bench scale testing was first conducted to determine the disinfectant specific CT values required to reduce both fecal coliform and enterococci to 100 cfu/100 mL, ensuring each disinfectant was evaluated against the same performance target. These tests established clear CT targets (8.7 mg·min/L for PFA, 25 mg·min/L for sodium hypochlorite, and 60 mg·min/L for PAA), which served as the basis for subsequent onsite evaluation for iCT-paced operation. Fixed dose operation and iCT paced operation were carried out onsite using the slip stream system which is a small scale, controlled side stream setup that diverts a portion of wastewater to evaluate disinfectant kinetics and performance without affecting full scale plant operations and is operated in a sequential batch mode. Under fixed dose operation (3 mg/L), the disinfectants exhibited distinct kinetic behavior. Average instantaneous demand followed the order PAA > NaOCl > PFA, with values of approximately 0.98 mg/L, 0.85 mg/L, and 0.64 mg/L, respectively. In contrast, decay rates exhibited the opposite trend: PFA decayed fastest (0.660 1/hr), sodium hypochlorite decayed at a moderate rate (0.131 1/hr), and PAA decayed most slowly (0.058 1/hr). The application of iCT paced dosing markedly improved operational consistency. Because iCT control adjusts the applied dose based on real time residual trends, it compensated for fluctuations in water quality that otherwise caused variability under fixed dosing. As a result, the system-maintained target CT levels with significantly greater stability by adjusting dosage based on real time demand and decay value and alignment with intended microbial reduction. This demonstrates a key operational insight: a disinfectant's apparent performance depends not only on its intrinsic kinetics but also on the dosing strategy's ability to manage variations in demand and decay. Overall, the combined bench scale and onsite results show that PFA offers the most rapid inactivation at the lowest CT, sodium hypochlorite remains the most stable and operationally reliable, and PAA provides moderate effectiveness with relatively high CT requirements. More importantly, iCT paced dosing enhances CT delivery accuracy and produces more consistent pathogen inactivation, positioning it as a powerful tool for both research and full scale operational control. The findings underscore the importance of accounting for kinetic behavior such as demand, decay, and reactivity in selecting disinfectants and designing dosing strategies for resilient, adaptive wastewater disinfection.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2026 in New Orleans, Louisiana.
Presentation time
11:00:00
11:15:00
Session time
10:30:00
12:00:00
SessionEvaluation of Efficacy and Control of Chemical Disinfectants
Session locationErnest N. Morial Convention Center
TopicDisinfection and Public Health, Facility Operations and Maintenance
TopicDisinfection and Public Health, Facility Operations and Maintenance
Author(s)
Jang, Eunkyung, Mitobe, Sierra, Cornfoot, Erick, Hussain, Sarmad, Kambeitz, Cindy, Watson, Ian, Boulter, Ashley, Santoro, Domenico
Author(s)E. Jang1, S. Mitobe2, E. Cornfoot1, S. Hussain1, C. Kambeitz3, I. Watson1, A. Boulter1, D. Santoro1
Author affiliation(s)USP Technologies, 1Lambton College, 2USP Technologies, 1USP Technologies, 1The Regional Municipality of Peel, 3USP Technologies, 1USP Technologies, 1
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep 2026
DOI10.2175/193864718825160370
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2026
Word count17

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Comparative Evaluation of Chlorine, Performic Acid, and Peracetic Acid Disinfection Kinetics Using Fixed‑Dose and iCT‑Paced Control'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Comparative Evaluation of Chlorine, Performic Acid, and Peracetic Acid Disinfection...
Comparative Evaluation of Chlorine, Performic Acid, and Peracetic Acid Disinfection Kinetics Using Fixed‑Dose and iCT‑Paced Control
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10128205
Get access
-10128205
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Comparative Evaluation of Chlorine, Performic Acid, and Peracetic Acid Disinfection Kinetics Using Fixed‑Dose and iCT‑Paced Control'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Comparative Evaluation of Chlorine, Performic Acid, and Peracetic Acid Disinfection...
Comparative Evaluation of Chlorine, Performic Acid, and Peracetic Acid Disinfection Kinetics Using Fixed‑Dose and iCT‑Paced Control
Abstract
1. Introduction Wastewater disinfection is a critical barrier for protecting public health, yet its performance is strongly influenced by disinfectant chemistry, wastewater matrix characteristics, and operational variability. Sodium hypochlorite remains the most common disinfectant in North America, but increasing interest in alternatives such as performic acid (PFA) and peracetic acid (PAA) has emerged due to concerns about chlorinated by products, evolving regulatory expectations, and the need for more resilient disinfection strategies. Despite this growing interest, comparative data evaluating how these disinfectants differ in their disinfection kinetics, CT requirements, and reactivity under real secondary effluent conditions remain limited. The objective of this study was to generate a comprehensive comparison of sodium hypochlorite, PFA, and PAA by characterizing their pathogen inactivation performance, disinfectant specific CT needs, and kinetic behavior, including demand and decay. A second objective was to evaluate how differences in disinfectant reactivity influence the consistency of disinfection performance when applied under variable wastewater conditions. By establishing clear kinetic benchmarks and examining their implications for operational control, the study aims to provide utilities with data driven guidance for selecting and optimizing disinfectants in modern wastewater treatment applications. 2. Methods This study used a combined bench scale and onsite approach to characterize disinfectant kinetics under both controlled and real world conditions. Bench scale testing with field collected wastewater was used to determine disinfectant specific CT values for reducing fecal coliform and enterococci, and to quantify inactivation kinetics, demand, and decay under controlled dosages. Onsite evaluation was carried out in Mississauga, Ontario, with a 32 L slip stream batch reactor operated in fixed dose mode (3 mg/L) and adaptive iCT paced dosing mode.

• Fixed dose operation (3 mg/L), which held the applied dose constant and allowed observation of natural variability in demand, decay, and residual behavior.

• iCT paced operation, which continuously adjusted disinfectant dosing in real time to meet the CT target, compensating for changes in water quality, demand, and decay

Residual disinfectant was measured every 2.5 minutes to calculate instantaneous demand and first order decay. Pathogen samples and residual profiles were collected across sequential batch cycles to assess how disinfectant reactivity such as demand, decay, and CT, translated into actual disinfection performance. Together, this integrated approach enabled a comprehensive comparison of disinfectant behavior across both conventional fixed dose control and real time iCT paced operation. 3. Results and Discussion Bench scale testing was first conducted to determine the disinfectant specific CT values required to reduce both fecal coliform and enterococci to 100 cfu/100 mL, ensuring each disinfectant was evaluated against the same performance target. These tests established clear CT targets (8.7 mg·min/L for PFA, 25 mg·min/L for sodium hypochlorite, and 60 mg·min/L for PAA), which served as the basis for subsequent onsite evaluation for iCT-paced operation. Fixed dose operation and iCT paced operation were carried out onsite using the slip stream system which is a small scale, controlled side stream setup that diverts a portion of wastewater to evaluate disinfectant kinetics and performance without affecting full scale plant operations and is operated in a sequential batch mode. Under fixed dose operation (3 mg/L), the disinfectants exhibited distinct kinetic behavior. Average instantaneous demand followed the order PAA > NaOCl > PFA, with values of approximately 0.98 mg/L, 0.85 mg/L, and 0.64 mg/L, respectively. In contrast, decay rates exhibited the opposite trend: PFA decayed fastest (0.660 1/hr), sodium hypochlorite decayed at a moderate rate (0.131 1/hr), and PAA decayed most slowly (0.058 1/hr). The application of iCT paced dosing markedly improved operational consistency. Because iCT control adjusts the applied dose based on real time residual trends, it compensated for fluctuations in water quality that otherwise caused variability under fixed dosing. As a result, the system-maintained target CT levels with significantly greater stability by adjusting dosage based on real time demand and decay value and alignment with intended microbial reduction. This demonstrates a key operational insight: a disinfectant's apparent performance depends not only on its intrinsic kinetics but also on the dosing strategy's ability to manage variations in demand and decay. Overall, the combined bench scale and onsite results show that PFA offers the most rapid inactivation at the lowest CT, sodium hypochlorite remains the most stable and operationally reliable, and PAA provides moderate effectiveness with relatively high CT requirements. More importantly, iCT paced dosing enhances CT delivery accuracy and produces more consistent pathogen inactivation, positioning it as a powerful tool for both research and full scale operational control. The findings underscore the importance of accounting for kinetic behavior such as demand, decay, and reactivity in selecting disinfectants and designing dosing strategies for resilient, adaptive wastewater disinfection.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2026 in New Orleans, Louisiana.
Presentation time
11:00:00
11:15:00
Session time
10:30:00
12:00:00
SessionEvaluation of Efficacy and Control of Chemical Disinfectants
Session locationErnest N. Morial Convention Center
TopicDisinfection and Public Health, Facility Operations and Maintenance
TopicDisinfection and Public Health, Facility Operations and Maintenance
Author(s)
Jang, Eunkyung, Mitobe, Sierra, Cornfoot, Erick, Hussain, Sarmad, Kambeitz, Cindy, Watson, Ian, Boulter, Ashley, Santoro, Domenico
Author(s)E. Jang1, S. Mitobe2, E. Cornfoot1, S. Hussain1, C. Kambeitz3, I. Watson1, A. Boulter1, D. Santoro1
Author affiliation(s)USP Technologies, 1Lambton College, 2USP Technologies, 1USP Technologies, 1The Regional Municipality of Peel, 3USP Technologies, 1USP Technologies, 1
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep 2026
DOI10.2175/193864718825160370
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2026
Word count17

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2026 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Jang, Eunkyung. Comparative Evaluation of Chlorine, Performic Acid, and Peracetic Acid Disinfection Kinetics Using Fixed‑Dose and iCT‑Paced Control. Water Environment Federation, 2026. Web. 10 Nov. 2026. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10128205CITANCHOR>.
Jang, Eunkyung. Comparative Evaluation of Chlorine, Performic Acid, and Peracetic Acid Disinfection Kinetics Using Fixed‑Dose and iCT‑Paced Control. Water Environment Federation, 2026. Accessed November 10, 2026. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10128205CITANCHOR.
Jang, Eunkyung
Comparative Evaluation of Chlorine, Performic Acid, and Peracetic Acid Disinfection Kinetics Using Fixed‑Dose and iCT‑Paced Control
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
September 30, 2026
November 10, 2026
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10128205CITANCHOR