lastID = -278625
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Using Business Cases and Triple-Bottom-Line Analysis to Mange and Prioritize Capital...
Using Business Cases and Triple-Bottom-Line Analysis to Mange and Prioritize Capital Improvement Program (Cip) Investment Decisions
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-02-23 15:34:36 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 06:18:09 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 06:18:07 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Using Business Cases and Triple-Bottom-Line Analysis to Mange and Prioritize Capital...
Using Business Cases and Triple-Bottom-Line Analysis to Mange and Prioritize Capital Improvement Program (Cip) Investment Decisions

Using Business Cases and Triple-Bottom-Line Analysis to Mange and Prioritize Capital Improvement Program (Cip) Investment Decisions

Using Business Cases and Triple-Bottom-Line Analysis to Mange and Prioritize Capital Improvement Program (Cip) Investment Decisions

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Using Business Cases and Triple-Bottom-Line Analysis to Mange and Prioritize Capital...
Using Business Cases and Triple-Bottom-Line Analysis to Mange and Prioritize Capital Improvement Program (Cip) Investment Decisions
Abstract
The Los Angeles Department of Public Works, Bureau of Sanitation (LA SAN) decided to strengthen its existing organization, processes, and practices by implementing an enhanced capital planning, project prioritization process and tools to yield rapid and measurable cost savings and performance improvements. The tools and templates developed for business case evalaution as well as triple bottom line (social, financial, and environmental) prioritization and scoring criteria will be used across treatment, collection, pumping and other assets and align with LASAN’s existing asset management and capital planning programs.LA SAN has taken a business oriented and financially driven CIP (Capital Investment Plannin) process that is focused on effective project prioitization and analysis.apporach and found that a key critical success factor is invlving the whole oraganization from the start of the palnning process including leadership, management and representatives from engineering, operations and maintenance, and finance divisions.LA SAN has considered a “business case” approach to proposed projects, requiring project sponsors to produce a comprehensive summary for each major project. Business cases typically include information and analysis such as: porject description and purpose, assessment of service level impact, identification of major criticality and risk issues, life-cycle cost forecasts, as well as financial analysis including ROI (Return on Investnent) and rate impacts and an evaluation of other likely project alternatives and scenarios.After business cases are completed, LA SAN used a transparent framework for project ranking and scoring to ensure the CIP projects are properly validated and that the most important projects are funded first. LA SAN developed and utilized a detailed criteria across all elements of the triple bottom line to ensure a balanced capital program that delievers on each utility’s stratgeic plan objectives incoporating not only asset condition and risk, but other elements such as efficiency/energy, communiy/growth, and financial and system reliability/service levels. This is very critical for LA SAN as funds are limited and more has to be done. The objective ranking process esnures that the most critical projects are funded first, while balancing many competing objectives.An integrated, asset management focused capital planning process is effective for LA SAN CIP process because it builds discipline, encourages analysis of options and alternative solutions, documents expected customer and environemental impacts, and ensures alignment with strategic asset manageent goals. In addition, this process provides greater transparency and integration with financial and rate analysis by ensuring that funding requirements are identifed up front, customer impacts are understood, and stakeholder needs are considered.Key benefits of LA SAN’s formal and dynamic capital investment planning process include:Greater understanding of the long-term service level and cost implications of capital investment decisionsEvaluation of the financial, social, and environmental impacts of major capital projectsGreater understanding of the true life-cycle cost of capital projects by examining project-specific ROI, NPV, and other financial measures.Establishment of a standard framework to evaluate treatment plant (vertical) as well as collection system assetsStrengthened long-term financial decision making, enabling accurate financial projections, and helping to ensure adequate funding and rate structures.Ensured that planning, engineering, operations, maintenance, and financial perspectives are all considered.Fostering a culture of collaboration throughout the organization.Creation of improved trust, understanding, and transparency with the public, elected officials, and stakeholders - strengthening the case for required investments and resources.Develop cross functional teams and committees to ensure a balanced perspective on capital planning and asset management issues and drive organizational change.
The Los Angeles Department of Public Works, Bureau of Sanitation (LA SAN) decided to strengthen its existing organization, processes, and practices by implementing an enhanced capital planning, project prioritization process and tools to yield rapid and measurable cost savings and performance improvements. The tools and templates developed for business case evalaution as well as triple bottom line...
Author(s)
Rowena LauVenu KolliAli PoostiAdel Hagekhalil
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectResearch Article
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep, 2015
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864715819555580
Volume / Issue2015 / 9
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2015
Word count580

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Using Business Cases and Triple-Bottom-Line Analysis to Mange and Prioritize Capital Improvement Program (Cip) Investment Decisions'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Using Business Cases and Triple-Bottom-Line Analysis to Mange and Prioritize Capital...
Using Business Cases and Triple-Bottom-Line Analysis to Mange and Prioritize Capital Improvement Program (Cip) Investment Decisions
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-278625
Get access
-278625
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Using Business Cases and Triple-Bottom-Line Analysis to Mange and Prioritize Capital Improvement Program (Cip) Investment Decisions'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Using Business Cases and Triple-Bottom-Line Analysis to Mange and Prioritize Capital...
Using Business Cases and Triple-Bottom-Line Analysis to Mange and Prioritize Capital Improvement Program (Cip) Investment Decisions
Abstract
The Los Angeles Department of Public Works, Bureau of Sanitation (LA SAN) decided to strengthen its existing organization, processes, and practices by implementing an enhanced capital planning, project prioritization process and tools to yield rapid and measurable cost savings and performance improvements. The tools and templates developed for business case evalaution as well as triple bottom line (social, financial, and environmental) prioritization and scoring criteria will be used across treatment, collection, pumping and other assets and align with LASAN’s existing asset management and capital planning programs.LA SAN has taken a business oriented and financially driven CIP (Capital Investment Plannin) process that is focused on effective project prioitization and analysis.apporach and found that a key critical success factor is invlving the whole oraganization from the start of the palnning process including leadership, management and representatives from engineering, operations and maintenance, and finance divisions.LA SAN has considered a “business case” approach to proposed projects, requiring project sponsors to produce a comprehensive summary for each major project. Business cases typically include information and analysis such as: porject description and purpose, assessment of service level impact, identification of major criticality and risk issues, life-cycle cost forecasts, as well as financial analysis including ROI (Return on Investnent) and rate impacts and an evaluation of other likely project alternatives and scenarios.After business cases are completed, LA SAN used a transparent framework for project ranking and scoring to ensure the CIP projects are properly validated and that the most important projects are funded first. LA SAN developed and utilized a detailed criteria across all elements of the triple bottom line to ensure a balanced capital program that delievers on each utility’s stratgeic plan objectives incoporating not only asset condition and risk, but other elements such as efficiency/energy, communiy/growth, and financial and system reliability/service levels. This is very critical for LA SAN as funds are limited and more has to be done. The objective ranking process esnures that the most critical projects are funded first, while balancing many competing objectives.An integrated, asset management focused capital planning process is effective for LA SAN CIP process because it builds discipline, encourages analysis of options and alternative solutions, documents expected customer and environemental impacts, and ensures alignment with strategic asset manageent goals. In addition, this process provides greater transparency and integration with financial and rate analysis by ensuring that funding requirements are identifed up front, customer impacts are understood, and stakeholder needs are considered.Key benefits of LA SAN’s formal and dynamic capital investment planning process include:Greater understanding of the long-term service level and cost implications of capital investment decisionsEvaluation of the financial, social, and environmental impacts of major capital projectsGreater understanding of the true life-cycle cost of capital projects by examining project-specific ROI, NPV, and other financial measures.Establishment of a standard framework to evaluate treatment plant (vertical) as well as collection system assetsStrengthened long-term financial decision making, enabling accurate financial projections, and helping to ensure adequate funding and rate structures.Ensured that planning, engineering, operations, maintenance, and financial perspectives are all considered.Fostering a culture of collaboration throughout the organization.Creation of improved trust, understanding, and transparency with the public, elected officials, and stakeholders - strengthening the case for required investments and resources.Develop cross functional teams and committees to ensure a balanced perspective on capital planning and asset management issues and drive organizational change.
The Los Angeles Department of Public Works, Bureau of Sanitation (LA SAN) decided to strengthen its existing organization, processes, and practices by implementing an enhanced capital planning, project prioritization process and tools to yield rapid and measurable cost savings and performance improvements. The tools and templates developed for business case evalaution as well as triple bottom line...
Author(s)
Rowena LauVenu KolliAli PoostiAdel Hagekhalil
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectResearch Article
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep, 2015
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864715819555580
Volume / Issue2015 / 9
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2015
Word count580

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Rowena Lau# Venu Kolli# Ali Poosti# Adel Hagekhalil. Using Business Cases and Triple-Bottom-Line Analysis to Mange and Prioritize Capital Improvement Program (Cip) Investment Decisions. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 30 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-278625CITANCHOR>.
Rowena Lau# Venu Kolli# Ali Poosti# Adel Hagekhalil. Using Business Cases and Triple-Bottom-Line Analysis to Mange and Prioritize Capital Improvement Program (Cip) Investment Decisions. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 30, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-278625CITANCHOR.
Rowena Lau# Venu Kolli# Ali Poosti# Adel Hagekhalil
Using Business Cases and Triple-Bottom-Line Analysis to Mange and Prioritize Capital Improvement Program (Cip) Investment Decisions
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 30, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-278625CITANCHOR