lastID = -280775
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Sustainability Evaluation of Food Waste Management Techniques
Sustainability Evaluation of Food Waste Management Techniques
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 16:43:17 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 16:43:16 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-30 23:23:45 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-30 23:23:44 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-30 20:52:39 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-30 20:52:37 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 16:40:12 Katherine Saltzman
  • 2020-03-27 16:40:11 Katherine Saltzman
  • 2020-03-27 01:22:06 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 04:39:26 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 04:39:25 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Sustainability Evaluation of Food Waste Management Techniques
Sustainability Evaluation of Food Waste Management Techniques

Sustainability Evaluation of Food Waste Management Techniques

Sustainability Evaluation of Food Waste Management Techniques

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Sustainability Evaluation of Food Waste Management Techniques
Sustainability Evaluation of Food Waste Management Techniques
Abstract
The storage, preparation, and consumption of food all contribute to the generation of food waste. The optimal food waste management method is a contentious issue and depends on multiple factors. At a minimum, policy makers should consider the environmental, economic, sociopolitical, and operational impacts of different food waste disposal methods. This analysis estimated the relative costs, carbon footprint, space footprint, labor demands, diesel fuel demand, electricity demand, and water demand of different residential food waste management methods. The food waste management methods were: disposal in a landfill operating with landfill gas collection and power production (Landfill), source-separated food waste collection and centralized composting (Compost), food waste disposal through kitchen grinders and sewer conveyance to a municipal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP/Sewers), source-separated food waste hauled to a municipal wastewater treatment plant and added directly to an anaerobic digester (WWTP/Hauled), and organic waste recovery from a mixed material recovery facility followed by hauling to a municipal WWTP anaerobic digester (Mixed MRF). A brief discussion of many qualitative issues associated with each food management method is also included. The focus of the research was on residential food waste generation and does not apply to commercial or industrial food waste generation.The Landfill alternative showed the highest biogenic and total CO2e emissions, while the WWTP/Hauled alternative showed the lowest non-biogenic and total CO2e emissions. The WWTP/Sewers alternative had the highest capital cost, but the operating costs were the lowest, thus the present worth was also the lowest. The largest space footprints were required for the compost facility, landfill, and MRF alternatives. The largest potable water demand was for the WWTP/Sewers alternative as a result of flushing water demand to convey food waste through the food waste processor and sewers.
The storage, preparation, and consumption of food all contribute to the generation of food waste. The optimal food waste management method is a contentious issue and depends on multiple factors. At a minimum, policy makers should consider the environmental, economic, sociopolitical, and operational impacts of different food waste disposal methods. This analysis estimated the relative costs, carbon...
Author(s)
Scott VandenburghCameron ClarkCale McPhersonDavid L. Parry
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Mar, 2012
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864712811694208
Volume / Issue2012 / 2
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
Copyright2012
Word count292

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Sustainability Evaluation of Food Waste Management Techniques'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Sustainability Evaluation of Food Waste Management Techniques
Sustainability Evaluation of Food Waste Management Techniques
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-280775
Get access
-280775
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Sustainability Evaluation of Food Waste Management Techniques'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Sustainability Evaluation of Food Waste Management Techniques
Sustainability Evaluation of Food Waste Management Techniques
Abstract
The storage, preparation, and consumption of food all contribute to the generation of food waste. The optimal food waste management method is a contentious issue and depends on multiple factors. At a minimum, policy makers should consider the environmental, economic, sociopolitical, and operational impacts of different food waste disposal methods. This analysis estimated the relative costs, carbon footprint, space footprint, labor demands, diesel fuel demand, electricity demand, and water demand of different residential food waste management methods. The food waste management methods were: disposal in a landfill operating with landfill gas collection and power production (Landfill), source-separated food waste collection and centralized composting (Compost), food waste disposal through kitchen grinders and sewer conveyance to a municipal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP/Sewers), source-separated food waste hauled to a municipal wastewater treatment plant and added directly to an anaerobic digester (WWTP/Hauled), and organic waste recovery from a mixed material recovery facility followed by hauling to a municipal WWTP anaerobic digester (Mixed MRF). A brief discussion of many qualitative issues associated with each food management method is also included. The focus of the research was on residential food waste generation and does not apply to commercial or industrial food waste generation.The Landfill alternative showed the highest biogenic and total CO2e emissions, while the WWTP/Hauled alternative showed the lowest non-biogenic and total CO2e emissions. The WWTP/Sewers alternative had the highest capital cost, but the operating costs were the lowest, thus the present worth was also the lowest. The largest space footprints were required for the compost facility, landfill, and MRF alternatives. The largest potable water demand was for the WWTP/Sewers alternative as a result of flushing water demand to convey food waste through the food waste processor and sewers.
The storage, preparation, and consumption of food all contribute to the generation of food waste. The optimal food waste management method is a contentious issue and depends on multiple factors. At a minimum, policy makers should consider the environmental, economic, sociopolitical, and operational impacts of different food waste disposal methods. This analysis estimated the relative costs, carbon...
Author(s)
Scott VandenburghCameron ClarkCale McPhersonDavid L. Parry
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Mar, 2012
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864712811694208
Volume / Issue2012 / 2
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
Copyright2012
Word count292

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Scott Vandenburgh# Cameron Clark# Cale McPherson# David L. Parry. Sustainability Evaluation of Food Waste Management Techniques. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 4 Jul. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-280775CITANCHOR>.
Scott Vandenburgh# Cameron Clark# Cale McPherson# David L. Parry. Sustainability Evaluation of Food Waste Management Techniques. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed July 4, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-280775CITANCHOR.
Scott Vandenburgh# Cameron Clark# Cale McPherson# David L. Parry
Sustainability Evaluation of Food Waste Management Techniques
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
July 4, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-280775CITANCHOR