lastID = -281872
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a Large Utility
Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a Large Utility
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 13:50:57 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-30 23:24:22 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-30 23:24:21 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-30 20:53:54 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-30 20:53:53 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 16:41:24 Katherine Saltzman
  • 2020-03-27 16:41:23 Katherine Saltzman
  • 2020-03-27 01:21:18 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 20:24:20 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 20:24:19 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a Large Utility
Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a Large Utility

Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a Large Utility

Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a Large Utility

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a Large Utility
Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a Large Utility
Abstract
The Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) operates a large wastewater treatment facility located on Deer Island in Boston Harbor. The 1,400 ML/d secondary facility has twelve, 11.3 ML egg-shaped digesters that minimize the sludge requiring further processing and generates 112 mmbtu/hr of biogas. On an annual basis, the biogas furnishes 98 percent of the plant's heating needs (including digester process heating) and 20 percent of the plant's power needs. The annual combined heat and power value of the biogas is approximately $20 million. Currently, seven of the twelve digesters are utilized.MWRA commissioned CDM Smith to explore the benefits and costs of co-digestion of wastewater sludge and other organic wastes at Deer Island. The study examined the types and characteristics of organic wastes that might be available, the logistics of transporting the wastes to the plant, the required modification of plant facilities, the expected additional biogas production, and the impact of co-digestion on the wastewater treatment process (sidestream impacts), subsequent dewatering, thermal drying and biosolids product marketability.The MWRA's objectives were to make better use of existing assets, reduce reliance on purchased power and increase revenues to help stabilize user rates. Co-digestion would also assist the State of Massachusetts in their goal of increasing recycling rates. The State intends to ban the incineration or landfilling of source-separated organics (SSO) potentially diverting up to 300,000 metric tons per year. SSO would typically include food wastes from supermarkets, institutions, and food producers.The processing of organic wastes at Deer Island is constrained by difficulty of transporting it to the facility. Although Deer Island is connected to the Town of Winthrop by a causeway, the truck route to the plant traverses narrow streets with dense residential development. MWRA has a long-standing agreement with the community that truck traffic will be kept to a minimum. Therefore, the study had to focus on marine transport by barge from one or more sites with good access.Another unique aspect of the feasibility study was to determine the method and responsibility for pre-processing of organic wastes. Since MWRA does not want to generate any residue which would require transport from the plant to a landfill, it is likely that private sector haulers would pre-process the wastes off-island and deliver an “engineered food waste” (EFW) to the plant. Pre-processing would typically include methods to screen and pulp the wastes, removing contaminants such as glass, plastic and metals to produce a uniform, pumpable material.The study examined a wide range of EFW quantities from approximately 10 percent to 30 percent of the volume of wastewater sludge. The report determined that the volume of additional biogas would increase by approximately 25-75 percent with EFW addition. However, approximately 30 percent of EFW remains after digestion and adds to the amount of sludge requiring downstream processing. Costs for additional processing and costs for expanded biogas utilization were factored into estimates of tipping fee charges necessary to sustain the co-digestion plan.MWRA has commenced laboratory studies of co-digestion, and intends to conduct full-scale trials at the plant and further refine the costs and benefits of co-digestion identified in the report. The Co-Digestion Report to MWRA will be completed in the spring of 2013 and the results will be available for WEFTEC.
The Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) operates a large wastewater treatment facility located on Deer Island in Boston Harbor. The 1,400 ML/d secondary facility has twelve, 11.3 ML egg-shaped digesters that minimize the sludge requiring further processing and generates 112 mmbtu/hr of biogas. On an annual basis, the biogas furnishes 98 percent of the plant's heating needs (including...
Author(s)
J.F. DonovanD.L. ParryD.K. O'Brien
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date May, 2013
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864713813536868
Volume / Issue2013 / 5
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
Copyright2013
Word count547

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a Large Utility'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a Large Utility
Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a Large Utility
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-281872
Get access
-281872
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a Large Utility'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a Large Utility
Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a Large Utility
Abstract
The Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) operates a large wastewater treatment facility located on Deer Island in Boston Harbor. The 1,400 ML/d secondary facility has twelve, 11.3 ML egg-shaped digesters that minimize the sludge requiring further processing and generates 112 mmbtu/hr of biogas. On an annual basis, the biogas furnishes 98 percent of the plant's heating needs (including digester process heating) and 20 percent of the plant's power needs. The annual combined heat and power value of the biogas is approximately $20 million. Currently, seven of the twelve digesters are utilized.MWRA commissioned CDM Smith to explore the benefits and costs of co-digestion of wastewater sludge and other organic wastes at Deer Island. The study examined the types and characteristics of organic wastes that might be available, the logistics of transporting the wastes to the plant, the required modification of plant facilities, the expected additional biogas production, and the impact of co-digestion on the wastewater treatment process (sidestream impacts), subsequent dewatering, thermal drying and biosolids product marketability.The MWRA's objectives were to make better use of existing assets, reduce reliance on purchased power and increase revenues to help stabilize user rates. Co-digestion would also assist the State of Massachusetts in their goal of increasing recycling rates. The State intends to ban the incineration or landfilling of source-separated organics (SSO) potentially diverting up to 300,000 metric tons per year. SSO would typically include food wastes from supermarkets, institutions, and food producers.The processing of organic wastes at Deer Island is constrained by difficulty of transporting it to the facility. Although Deer Island is connected to the Town of Winthrop by a causeway, the truck route to the plant traverses narrow streets with dense residential development. MWRA has a long-standing agreement with the community that truck traffic will be kept to a minimum. Therefore, the study had to focus on marine transport by barge from one or more sites with good access.Another unique aspect of the feasibility study was to determine the method and responsibility for pre-processing of organic wastes. Since MWRA does not want to generate any residue which would require transport from the plant to a landfill, it is likely that private sector haulers would pre-process the wastes off-island and deliver an “engineered food waste” (EFW) to the plant. Pre-processing would typically include methods to screen and pulp the wastes, removing contaminants such as glass, plastic and metals to produce a uniform, pumpable material.The study examined a wide range of EFW quantities from approximately 10 percent to 30 percent of the volume of wastewater sludge. The report determined that the volume of additional biogas would increase by approximately 25-75 percent with EFW addition. However, approximately 30 percent of EFW remains after digestion and adds to the amount of sludge requiring downstream processing. Costs for additional processing and costs for expanded biogas utilization were factored into estimates of tipping fee charges necessary to sustain the co-digestion plan.MWRA has commenced laboratory studies of co-digestion, and intends to conduct full-scale trials at the plant and further refine the costs and benefits of co-digestion identified in the report. The Co-Digestion Report to MWRA will be completed in the spring of 2013 and the results will be available for WEFTEC.
The Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) operates a large wastewater treatment facility located on Deer Island in Boston Harbor. The 1,400 ML/d secondary facility has twelve, 11.3 ML egg-shaped digesters that minimize the sludge requiring further processing and generates 112 mmbtu/hr of biogas. On an annual basis, the biogas furnishes 98 percent of the plant's heating needs (including...
Author(s)
J.F. DonovanD.L. ParryD.K. O'Brien
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date May, 2013
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864713813536868
Volume / Issue2013 / 5
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
Copyright2013
Word count547

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
J.F. Donovan# D.L. Parry# D.K. O'Brien. Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a Large Utility. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 7 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-281872CITANCHOR>.
J.F. Donovan# D.L. Parry# D.K. O'Brien. Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a Large Utility. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 7, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-281872CITANCHOR.
J.F. Donovan# D.L. Parry# D.K. O'Brien
Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a Large Utility
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 7, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-281872CITANCHOR