lastID = -282252
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: W14-Proceedings
Evaluating Energy Reduction Alternatives Using Process Modeling Tools – A Case Study of Stickney WRP
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-03-31 01:56:03 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-31 01:56:02 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 22:45:28 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 22:45:27 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: W14-Proceedings
Evaluating Energy Reduction Alternatives Using Process Modeling Tools – A Case Study of Stickney WRP

Evaluating Energy Reduction Alternatives Using Process Modeling Tools – A Case Study of Stickney WRP

Evaluating Energy Reduction Alternatives Using Process Modeling Tools – A Case Study of Stickney WRP

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: W14-Proceedings
Evaluating Energy Reduction Alternatives Using Process Modeling Tools – A Case Study of Stickney WRP
Abstract
Stickney Water Reclamation Plant treats an average wastewater flow of 742 MGD and consumes about 20,000 HP of energy to provide about 677 TPD of aeration. The facility’s permit requires that the effluent is discharged with a minimum effluent dissolved oxygen (DO) level of 6 mg/l. About 30% of the total aeration energy demand at the facility is utilized in raising the DO level to 8 mg/l in the reaeration step, and the facility is currently evaluating alternatives for reducing this energy demand. In this study, we evaluated the impact of a conventional aeration and High Purity Oxygen (HPO) hybrid mix on the energy footprint using a calibrated GPS-X™ process model of the plant. The modeling study indicated that the use of high purity oxygen (HPO) for effluent re aeration could potentially reduce the power demand by about 6, 800 HP (34%), corresponding to a decrease in the greenhouse gas footprint by about 30,750 metric tons of CO2/year. The paper also provides an overview of reaeration options and the key design variables to consider when evaluating them. Our work indicates that conventional aeration supplemented with HPO can b e an effective means of reducing the energy footprint of wastewater treatment facilities. We also show that process models can be a powerful tool for optimizing aeration solutions at wastewater facilities.
Stickney Water Reclamation Plant treats an average wastewater flow of 742 MGD and consumes about 20,000 HP of energy to provide about 677 TPD of aeration. The facility’s permit requires that the effluent is discharged with a minimum effluent dissolved oxygen (DO) level of 6 mg/l. About 30% of the total aeration energy demand at the facility is utilized in raising the DO...
Author(s)
Malcolm FabiyiKaren ConneryRichard NovakDori BernsteinF. John Ludwig
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct, 2014
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864714815939750
Volume / Issue2014 / 13
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2014
Word count233

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Evaluating Energy Reduction Alternatives Using Process Modeling Tools – A Case Study of Stickney WRP'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: W14-Proceedings
Evaluating Energy Reduction Alternatives Using Process Modeling Tools – A Case Study of Stickney WRP
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-282252
Get access
-282252
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Evaluating Energy Reduction Alternatives Using Process Modeling Tools – A Case Study of Stickney WRP'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: W14-Proceedings
Evaluating Energy Reduction Alternatives Using Process Modeling Tools – A Case Study of Stickney WRP
Abstract
Stickney Water Reclamation Plant treats an average wastewater flow of 742 MGD and consumes about 20,000 HP of energy to provide about 677 TPD of aeration. The facility’s permit requires that the effluent is discharged with a minimum effluent dissolved oxygen (DO) level of 6 mg/l. About 30% of the total aeration energy demand at the facility is utilized in raising the DO level to 8 mg/l in the reaeration step, and the facility is currently evaluating alternatives for reducing this energy demand. In this study, we evaluated the impact of a conventional aeration and High Purity Oxygen (HPO) hybrid mix on the energy footprint using a calibrated GPS-X™ process model of the plant. The modeling study indicated that the use of high purity oxygen (HPO) for effluent re aeration could potentially reduce the power demand by about 6, 800 HP (34%), corresponding to a decrease in the greenhouse gas footprint by about 30,750 metric tons of CO2/year. The paper also provides an overview of reaeration options and the key design variables to consider when evaluating them. Our work indicates that conventional aeration supplemented with HPO can b e an effective means of reducing the energy footprint of wastewater treatment facilities. We also show that process models can be a powerful tool for optimizing aeration solutions at wastewater facilities.
Stickney Water Reclamation Plant treats an average wastewater flow of 742 MGD and consumes about 20,000 HP of energy to provide about 677 TPD of aeration. The facility’s permit requires that the effluent is discharged with a minimum effluent dissolved oxygen (DO) level of 6 mg/l. About 30% of the total aeration energy demand at the facility is utilized in raising the DO...
Author(s)
Malcolm FabiyiKaren ConneryRichard NovakDori BernsteinF. John Ludwig
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct, 2014
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864714815939750
Volume / Issue2014 / 13
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2014
Word count233

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Malcolm Fabiyi# Karen Connery# Richard Novak# Dori Bernstein# F. John Ludwig. Evaluating Energy Reduction Alternatives Using Process Modeling Tools – A Case Study of Stickney WRP. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 6 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-282252CITANCHOR>.
Malcolm Fabiyi# Karen Connery# Richard Novak# Dori Bernstein# F. John Ludwig. Evaluating Energy Reduction Alternatives Using Process Modeling Tools – A Case Study of Stickney WRP. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 6, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-282252CITANCHOR.
Malcolm Fabiyi# Karen Connery# Richard Novak# Dori Bernstein# F. John Ludwig
Evaluating Energy Reduction Alternatives Using Process Modeling Tools – A Case Study of Stickney WRP
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 6, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-282252CITANCHOR