lastID = -282903
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a large Utility
Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a large Utility
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 20:11:41 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 20:11:40 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-31 01:52:51 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-31 01:52:50 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 20:24:22 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 20:24:21 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a large Utility
Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a large Utility

Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a large Utility

Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a large Utility

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a large Utility
Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a large Utility
Abstract
CDM Smith Inc. (CDM Smith) recently completed an evaluation for the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) to explore the benefits and costs of co-digestion of wastewater biosolids and other organic wastes at the Deer Island Treatment Plant (“DITP”). This study was very timely since the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection intends to ban the landfilling or incineration of some source-separate organics such as food wastes from supermarkets and food-producing industries. The study examined the types and characteristics of organic wastes that might be available, the logistics of transporting the wastes to the plant, the required modification of plant facilities, the expected additional biogas production, and the side stream impact of co-digestion on the wastewater treatment process (sidestream impacts), impacts on biosolids subsequent dewatering, thermal drying and biosolids product marketability.The MWRA’s objectives were to make better use of existing assets, reduce reliance on purchased power and increase revenues to help stabilize user rates. Co-digestion would also assist the State of Massac husetts in their goal of increasing recycling rates. The State intends to ban the incineration or landfilling of source-separated organics (SSO) potentially diverting up to 350,000 tons per year (317,500 tonnes per year) by 2020. SSO would typically include food wastes from commercial and industrial sources such as supermarkets, restaurants, and food producers.
CDM Smith Inc. (CDM Smith) recently completed an evaluation for the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) to explore the benefits and costs of co-digestion of wastewater biosolids and other organic wastes at the Deer Island Treatment Plant (“DITP”). This study was very timely since the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection intends to ban the landfilling or...
Author(s)
Eric M. SpargiminoJohn F. DonovanDavid L. ParryDavid Duest
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct, 2014
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864714815941342
Volume / Issue2014 / 9
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2014
Word count223

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a large Utility'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a large Utility
Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a large Utility
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-282903
Get access
-282903
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a large Utility'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a large Utility
Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a large Utility
Abstract
CDM Smith Inc. (CDM Smith) recently completed an evaluation for the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) to explore the benefits and costs of co-digestion of wastewater biosolids and other organic wastes at the Deer Island Treatment Plant (“DITP”). This study was very timely since the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection intends to ban the landfilling or incineration of some source-separate organics such as food wastes from supermarkets and food-producing industries. The study examined the types and characteristics of organic wastes that might be available, the logistics of transporting the wastes to the plant, the required modification of plant facilities, the expected additional biogas production, and the side stream impact of co-digestion on the wastewater treatment process (sidestream impacts), impacts on biosolids subsequent dewatering, thermal drying and biosolids product marketability.The MWRA’s objectives were to make better use of existing assets, reduce reliance on purchased power and increase revenues to help stabilize user rates. Co-digestion would also assist the State of Massac husetts in their goal of increasing recycling rates. The State intends to ban the incineration or landfilling of source-separated organics (SSO) potentially diverting up to 350,000 tons per year (317,500 tonnes per year) by 2020. SSO would typically include food wastes from commercial and industrial sources such as supermarkets, restaurants, and food producers.
CDM Smith Inc. (CDM Smith) recently completed an evaluation for the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) to explore the benefits and costs of co-digestion of wastewater biosolids and other organic wastes at the Deer Island Treatment Plant (“DITP”). This study was very timely since the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection intends to ban the landfilling or...
Author(s)
Eric M. SpargiminoJohn F. DonovanDavid L. ParryDavid Duest
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct, 2014
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864714815941342
Volume / Issue2014 / 9
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2014
Word count223

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Eric M. Spargimino# John F. Donovan# David L. Parry# David Duest. Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a large Utility. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 7 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-282903CITANCHOR>.
Eric M. Spargimino# John F. Donovan# David L. Parry# David Duest. Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a large Utility. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 7, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-282903CITANCHOR.
Eric M. Spargimino# John F. Donovan# David L. Parry# David Duest
Benefits and Costs of Co-Digestion for a large Utility
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 7, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-282903CITANCHOR