lastID = -287937
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
AN EVALUATION OF SAMPLING TIME TO ASSESS NITRIFYING BIOFILM DEVELOPMENT: ACTIVITY vs. PHYLOGENETIC COMPOSITION
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 18:42:16 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 18:42:15 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 19:30:27 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 19:30:26 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
AN EVALUATION OF SAMPLING TIME TO ASSESS NITRIFYING BIOFILM DEVELOPMENT: ACTIVITY vs. PHYLOGENETIC COMPOSITION

AN EVALUATION OF SAMPLING TIME TO ASSESS NITRIFYING BIOFILM DEVELOPMENT: ACTIVITY vs. PHYLOGENETIC COMPOSITION

AN EVALUATION OF SAMPLING TIME TO ASSESS NITRIFYING BIOFILM DEVELOPMENT: ACTIVITY vs. PHYLOGENETIC COMPOSITION

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
AN EVALUATION OF SAMPLING TIME TO ASSESS NITRIFYING BIOFILM DEVELOPMENT: ACTIVITY vs. PHYLOGENETIC COMPOSITION
Abstract
In start-up studies of NTFs, the time to achieve a constant rate of ammonia-removal per media area has varied from 20 (Wik 1996) to 100 days (Thorn et al. 1996). For monitoring purposes, a more accurate determination of the time required is needed. This will allow for the selection of a sampling time that results in biofilm growth which is representative of the mature biofilm within the NTF. The length of time required for a representative biofilm to develop on a clean sampling surface was determined by (1) evaluating bench-scale nitrate plus nitrite generation rates for biofilm samples collected from a full-scale NTF and by (2) quantifying the ammonia-oxidizing populations through the application of Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH). Three separate determinations were performed. Biofilms between 14 and 70 days old were evaluated. The biofilms were considered to be representative of the mature biofilm within the NTF when there were no significant differences between sampling events for bench-scale nitrate plus nitrite generation rates for biofilms of increasing age. The time required for a biofilm to develop (on a clean sampling surface) that was representative of the ammonia-oxidizing capacity of the mature biofilm within the NTF was approximately 28 days. Under consistent operating conditions, 21 day old biofilms collected from sample Port 2 achieved 96.3% and 93.9% of the nitrate plus nitrite generation rates (g-N/m2*day) of 28 day old biofilms. Therefore, a 21 day sampling period should result in biofilm samples that are representative of the ammonia-oxidizing capacity of the mature biofilm within the NTF. Information on biofilm community structure obtained through Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization supports this conclusion. Moreover, changes in ammonia-oxidation capacity with time appear to be the result of shifts in the percent of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria present, suggesting that nitrifying biofilms are more dynamic than previously thought and that they are capable of responding to changes in environmental conditions in as little as 7 days.
In start-up studies of NTFs, the time to achieve a constant rate of ammonia-removal per media area has varied from 20 (Wik 1996) to 100 days (Thorn et al. 1996). For monitoring purposes, a more accurate determination of the time required is needed. This will allow for the selection of a sampling time that results in biofilm growth which is representative of the mature biofilm within the NTF. The...
Author(s)
Sidney BiesterfeldLinda Figueroa
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 57 - Research Symposium: Nitrification
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2001
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20010101)2001:11L.516;1-
DOI10.2175/193864701790860281
Volume / Issue2001 / 11
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)516 - 544
Copyright2001
Word count332

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'AN EVALUATION OF SAMPLING TIME TO ASSESS NITRIFYING BIOFILM DEVELOPMENT: ACTIVITY vs. PHYLOGENETIC COMPOSITION'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
AN EVALUATION OF SAMPLING TIME TO ASSESS NITRIFYING BIOFILM DEVELOPMENT: ACTIVITY vs. PHYLOGENETIC COMPOSITION
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-287937
Get access
-287937
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'AN EVALUATION OF SAMPLING TIME TO ASSESS NITRIFYING BIOFILM DEVELOPMENT: ACTIVITY vs. PHYLOGENETIC COMPOSITION'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
AN EVALUATION OF SAMPLING TIME TO ASSESS NITRIFYING BIOFILM DEVELOPMENT: ACTIVITY vs. PHYLOGENETIC COMPOSITION
Abstract
In start-up studies of NTFs, the time to achieve a constant rate of ammonia-removal per media area has varied from 20 (Wik 1996) to 100 days (Thorn et al. 1996). For monitoring purposes, a more accurate determination of the time required is needed. This will allow for the selection of a sampling time that results in biofilm growth which is representative of the mature biofilm within the NTF. The length of time required for a representative biofilm to develop on a clean sampling surface was determined by (1) evaluating bench-scale nitrate plus nitrite generation rates for biofilm samples collected from a full-scale NTF and by (2) quantifying the ammonia-oxidizing populations through the application of Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH). Three separate determinations were performed. Biofilms between 14 and 70 days old were evaluated. The biofilms were considered to be representative of the mature biofilm within the NTF when there were no significant differences between sampling events for bench-scale nitrate plus nitrite generation rates for biofilms of increasing age. The time required for a biofilm to develop (on a clean sampling surface) that was representative of the ammonia-oxidizing capacity of the mature biofilm within the NTF was approximately 28 days. Under consistent operating conditions, 21 day old biofilms collected from sample Port 2 achieved 96.3% and 93.9% of the nitrate plus nitrite generation rates (g-N/m2*day) of 28 day old biofilms. Therefore, a 21 day sampling period should result in biofilm samples that are representative of the ammonia-oxidizing capacity of the mature biofilm within the NTF. Information on biofilm community structure obtained through Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization supports this conclusion. Moreover, changes in ammonia-oxidation capacity with time appear to be the result of shifts in the percent of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria present, suggesting that nitrifying biofilms are more dynamic than previously thought and that they are capable of responding to changes in environmental conditions in as little as 7 days.
In start-up studies of NTFs, the time to achieve a constant rate of ammonia-removal per media area has varied from 20 (Wik 1996) to 100 days (Thorn et al. 1996). For monitoring purposes, a more accurate determination of the time required is needed. This will allow for the selection of a sampling time that results in biofilm growth which is representative of the mature biofilm within the NTF. The...
Author(s)
Sidney BiesterfeldLinda Figueroa
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 57 - Research Symposium: Nitrification
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2001
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20010101)2001:11L.516;1-
DOI10.2175/193864701790860281
Volume / Issue2001 / 11
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)516 - 544
Copyright2001
Word count332

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Sidney Biesterfeld# Linda Figueroa. AN EVALUATION OF SAMPLING TIME TO ASSESS NITRIFYING BIOFILM DEVELOPMENT: ACTIVITY vs. PHYLOGENETIC COMPOSITION. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 11 Oct. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-287937CITANCHOR>.
Sidney Biesterfeld# Linda Figueroa. AN EVALUATION OF SAMPLING TIME TO ASSESS NITRIFYING BIOFILM DEVELOPMENT: ACTIVITY vs. PHYLOGENETIC COMPOSITION. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed October 11, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-287937CITANCHOR.
Sidney Biesterfeld# Linda Figueroa
AN EVALUATION OF SAMPLING TIME TO ASSESS NITRIFYING BIOFILM DEVELOPMENT: ACTIVITY vs. PHYLOGENETIC COMPOSITION
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
October 11, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-287937CITANCHOR