lastID = -288105
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
EFFECT OF SOLIDS RETENTION TIME ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THERMOPHILIC AND MESOPHILIC DIGESTION
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 18:23:53 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 18:23:52 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 22:18:51 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 22:18:50 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
EFFECT OF SOLIDS RETENTION TIME ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THERMOPHILIC AND MESOPHILIC DIGESTION

EFFECT OF SOLIDS RETENTION TIME ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THERMOPHILIC AND MESOPHILIC DIGESTION

EFFECT OF SOLIDS RETENTION TIME ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THERMOPHILIC AND MESOPHILIC DIGESTION

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
EFFECT OF SOLIDS RETENTION TIME ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THERMOPHILIC AND MESOPHILIC DIGESTION
Abstract
This paper compares the steady-state performance of thermophilic and mesophilic digestion as a function of SRT. Laboratory thermophilic (55°C) and mesophilic (35°C) digesters were operated in parallel at SRTs ranging from 4 to 15 days, treating prethickened combined primary and secondary waste sludge, to compare the performance of thermophilic and mesophilic digestion under equal solids loading conditions. Results from pilot plant operation of thermophilic and mesophilic digesters at 20 days SRT (King County, WA) are also included.The pH, alkalinity, and average ammonia concentrations were higher for the thermophilic digester than the mesophilic digester at each SRT. Thermophilic digestion had higher VFA and SCOD concentrations at all SRTs, with a VFA composition similar to mesophilic digestion at the 15 day SRT. However, at lower SRTs, the thermophilic digester showed much higher propionate and slightly more butyrate.Gas production rates and methane content of the digester gases were similar at long SRTs (10 days and greater), while the thermophilic digester produced more gas with a higher methane content at lower SRTs (6 days and less). Carbohydrates were readily degraded by both digesters, protein was the major component in the sludge at the long SRTs, and lipid and protein content was in the same range at the 6-day SRT.The TS and VS concentrations of the thermophilic and mesophilic digesters increased with decreasing SRT, and there was no statistically significant difference (student's t test, 95 percent confidence level) between the VS destruction efficiencies of the thermophilic and mesophilic digesters at SRTs of 6, 10, and 20 days.At the 4-day SRT, methanogenic activity was maintained in the thermophilic digester but not in the mesophilic digester, indicating a greater maximum specific growth rate for thermophilic microorganisms.A first order model was used to fit the VS destruction efficiency with time for both the thermophilic and mesophilic digesters. The results show that staged digestion could result in significant improvement in VS destruction efficiency, and suggest that staged mesophilic digestion would provide similar VS destruction efficiencies as a TPAD system.
This paper compares the steady-state performance of thermophilic and mesophilic digestion as a function of SRT. Laboratory thermophilic (55°C) and mesophilic (35°C) digesters were operated in parallel at SRTs ranging from 4 to 15 days, treating prethickened combined primary and secondary waste sludge, to compare the performance of thermophilic and mesophilic digestion under equal solids...
Author(s)
Greg MoenH. David StenselRaghida LepistöJohn Ferguson
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 24 - Residuals and Biosolids Management Symposium: Anaerobic Digestion
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2001
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20010101)2001:14L.432;1-
DOI10.2175/193864701802779143
Volume / Issue2001 / 14
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)432 - 451
Copyright2001
Word count344

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'EFFECT OF SOLIDS RETENTION TIME ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THERMOPHILIC AND MESOPHILIC DIGESTION'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
EFFECT OF SOLIDS RETENTION TIME ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THERMOPHILIC AND MESOPHILIC DIGESTION
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-288105
Get access
-288105
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'EFFECT OF SOLIDS RETENTION TIME ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THERMOPHILIC AND MESOPHILIC DIGESTION'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
EFFECT OF SOLIDS RETENTION TIME ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THERMOPHILIC AND MESOPHILIC DIGESTION
Abstract
This paper compares the steady-state performance of thermophilic and mesophilic digestion as a function of SRT. Laboratory thermophilic (55°C) and mesophilic (35°C) digesters were operated in parallel at SRTs ranging from 4 to 15 days, treating prethickened combined primary and secondary waste sludge, to compare the performance of thermophilic and mesophilic digestion under equal solids loading conditions. Results from pilot plant operation of thermophilic and mesophilic digesters at 20 days SRT (King County, WA) are also included.The pH, alkalinity, and average ammonia concentrations were higher for the thermophilic digester than the mesophilic digester at each SRT. Thermophilic digestion had higher VFA and SCOD concentrations at all SRTs, with a VFA composition similar to mesophilic digestion at the 15 day SRT. However, at lower SRTs, the thermophilic digester showed much higher propionate and slightly more butyrate.Gas production rates and methane content of the digester gases were similar at long SRTs (10 days and greater), while the thermophilic digester produced more gas with a higher methane content at lower SRTs (6 days and less). Carbohydrates were readily degraded by both digesters, protein was the major component in the sludge at the long SRTs, and lipid and protein content was in the same range at the 6-day SRT.The TS and VS concentrations of the thermophilic and mesophilic digesters increased with decreasing SRT, and there was no statistically significant difference (student's t test, 95 percent confidence level) between the VS destruction efficiencies of the thermophilic and mesophilic digesters at SRTs of 6, 10, and 20 days.At the 4-day SRT, methanogenic activity was maintained in the thermophilic digester but not in the mesophilic digester, indicating a greater maximum specific growth rate for thermophilic microorganisms.A first order model was used to fit the VS destruction efficiency with time for both the thermophilic and mesophilic digesters. The results show that staged digestion could result in significant improvement in VS destruction efficiency, and suggest that staged mesophilic digestion would provide similar VS destruction efficiencies as a TPAD system.
This paper compares the steady-state performance of thermophilic and mesophilic digestion as a function of SRT. Laboratory thermophilic (55°C) and mesophilic (35°C) digesters were operated in parallel at SRTs ranging from 4 to 15 days, treating prethickened combined primary and secondary waste sludge, to compare the performance of thermophilic and mesophilic digestion under equal solids...
Author(s)
Greg MoenH. David StenselRaghida LepistöJohn Ferguson
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 24 - Residuals and Biosolids Management Symposium: Anaerobic Digestion
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2001
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20010101)2001:14L.432;1-
DOI10.2175/193864701802779143
Volume / Issue2001 / 14
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)432 - 451
Copyright2001
Word count344

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Greg Moen# H. David Stensel# Raghida Lepistö# John Ferguson. EFFECT OF SOLIDS RETENTION TIME ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THERMOPHILIC AND MESOPHILIC DIGESTION. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 6 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-288105CITANCHOR>.
Greg Moen# H. David Stensel# Raghida Lepistö# John Ferguson. EFFECT OF SOLIDS RETENTION TIME ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THERMOPHILIC AND MESOPHILIC DIGESTION. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 6, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-288105CITANCHOR.
Greg Moen# H. David Stensel# Raghida Lepistö# John Ferguson
EFFECT OF SOLIDS RETENTION TIME ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THERMOPHILIC AND MESOPHILIC DIGESTION
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 6, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-288105CITANCHOR