lastID = -288353
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
ALUM WTR AS AN AMENDMENT FOR PHOSPHORUS-ENRICHED SOILS
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 13:47:45 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 13:47:44 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:57:35 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:57:34 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 19:28:15 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 19:28:14 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
ALUM WTR AS AN AMENDMENT FOR PHOSPHORUS-ENRICHED SOILS

ALUM WTR AS AN AMENDMENT FOR PHOSPHORUS-ENRICHED SOILS

ALUM WTR AS AN AMENDMENT FOR PHOSPHORUS-ENRICHED SOILS

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
ALUM WTR AS AN AMENDMENT FOR PHOSPHORUS-ENRICHED SOILS
Abstract
As point discharges of phosphorus (P) and other pollutants to surface waters from industrial and municipal wastewater systems have been reduced, nonpoint sources of P are now contributing a greater portion of P inputs into freshwater resources. Agricultural runoff and/or erosion can be a major contributor to this nonpoint source pollution. Continued inputs of fertilizer and manure P in excess of crop requirements have led to a buildup of soil P levels which are of environmental, rather than agronomic concern, particularly in areas of intensive crop and livestock production. Six sites with soils having very high P test levels were selected in 1998–2000 for field evaluation of utilizing alum water treatment residuals (WTR) to reduce these high levels. In Michigan, the Bray-Kurtz P1 (Bray P1) extractant is used as part of the soil fertility test to determine plant-available P levels. When Bray P1 soil test levels reach 75–100 lb P/acre, the P2O5 fertilizer recommendations will usually be zero for most crops and yield levels grown in Michigan. When Bray P1 levels exceed 300 lb P/acre, manure management practices in Michigan recommend not applying any additional manure and/or fertilizer P. Two sites were established each year for amendment with alum WTR in the 1998, 1999 and 2000 growing seasons. The six sites had Bray P1 test levels of about 600, 1200, 1100, 1100, 800 and 500 lb P/acre. Alum WTR were applied to the 1998 sites at rates of 17 and 51 dry ton/acre and to the 1999 sites at rates of 20 and 60 dry ton/acre. In 2000, a different source of alum WTR was used at rates of 33 and 99 dry ton/acre. Soils were disked twice at each site following application to mix the WTR with soil. Subsequent tillage for additional mixing and seedbed preparation prior to planting varied from site to site. All six sites were rototilled in April/May, 2000 prior to planting to get a more thorough mixing of WTR and soil. Field corn (Zea mays L.) was planted at each site in all three years, except one of the sites established in 1999 was planted to soybeans (Glycine max L.) in 2000. Diagnostic leaf tissue samples and yield measurements of corn and soybeans were taken during each growing season. Soils were periodically sampled to evaluate changes in Bray P1 test levels with time. Bray P1 soil test levels declined at the two sites established in 1998 from spring, 1998 to fall, 1999, but alum WTR amendments did not contribute to this decrease. At the 1999 sites, some decline in Bray P1 soil test levels was also observed during the six months of the 1999 growing season, and alum WTR did appear to contribute to some additional decrease at the high application rate. The decrease in Bray P1 soil test that was expected from WTR amendments may be delayed, due to inadequate mixing of alum WTR and/or the amount of active aluminum added by the WTR.
As point discharges of phosphorus (P) and other pollutants to surface waters from industrial and municipal wastewater systems have been reduced, nonpoint sources of P are now contributing a greater portion of P inputs into freshwater resources. Agricultural runoff and/or erosion can be a major contributor to this nonpoint source pollution. Continued inputs of fertilizer and manure P in excess of...
Author(s)
Lee W. JacobsBrian J. Teppen
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 13: Nutrient Management with Water Treatment Residuals
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2001
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20010101)2001:1L.864;1-
DOI10.2175/193864701784993876
Volume / Issue2001 / 1
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)864 - 877
Copyright2001
Word count501

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'ALUM WTR AS AN AMENDMENT FOR PHOSPHORUS-ENRICHED SOILS'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
ALUM WTR AS AN AMENDMENT FOR PHOSPHORUS-ENRICHED SOILS
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-288353
Get access
-288353
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'ALUM WTR AS AN AMENDMENT FOR PHOSPHORUS-ENRICHED SOILS'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
ALUM WTR AS AN AMENDMENT FOR PHOSPHORUS-ENRICHED SOILS
Abstract
As point discharges of phosphorus (P) and other pollutants to surface waters from industrial and municipal wastewater systems have been reduced, nonpoint sources of P are now contributing a greater portion of P inputs into freshwater resources. Agricultural runoff and/or erosion can be a major contributor to this nonpoint source pollution. Continued inputs of fertilizer and manure P in excess of crop requirements have led to a buildup of soil P levels which are of environmental, rather than agronomic concern, particularly in areas of intensive crop and livestock production. Six sites with soils having very high P test levels were selected in 1998–2000 for field evaluation of utilizing alum water treatment residuals (WTR) to reduce these high levels. In Michigan, the Bray-Kurtz P1 (Bray P1) extractant is used as part of the soil fertility test to determine plant-available P levels. When Bray P1 soil test levels reach 75–100 lb P/acre, the P2O5 fertilizer recommendations will usually be zero for most crops and yield levels grown in Michigan. When Bray P1 levels exceed 300 lb P/acre, manure management practices in Michigan recommend not applying any additional manure and/or fertilizer P. Two sites were established each year for amendment with alum WTR in the 1998, 1999 and 2000 growing seasons. The six sites had Bray P1 test levels of about 600, 1200, 1100, 1100, 800 and 500 lb P/acre. Alum WTR were applied to the 1998 sites at rates of 17 and 51 dry ton/acre and to the 1999 sites at rates of 20 and 60 dry ton/acre. In 2000, a different source of alum WTR was used at rates of 33 and 99 dry ton/acre. Soils were disked twice at each site following application to mix the WTR with soil. Subsequent tillage for additional mixing and seedbed preparation prior to planting varied from site to site. All six sites were rototilled in April/May, 2000 prior to planting to get a more thorough mixing of WTR and soil. Field corn (Zea mays L.) was planted at each site in all three years, except one of the sites established in 1999 was planted to soybeans (Glycine max L.) in 2000. Diagnostic leaf tissue samples and yield measurements of corn and soybeans were taken during each growing season. Soils were periodically sampled to evaluate changes in Bray P1 test levels with time. Bray P1 soil test levels declined at the two sites established in 1998 from spring, 1998 to fall, 1999, but alum WTR amendments did not contribute to this decrease. At the 1999 sites, some decline in Bray P1 soil test levels was also observed during the six months of the 1999 growing season, and alum WTR did appear to contribute to some additional decrease at the high application rate. The decrease in Bray P1 soil test that was expected from WTR amendments may be delayed, due to inadequate mixing of alum WTR and/or the amount of active aluminum added by the WTR.
As point discharges of phosphorus (P) and other pollutants to surface waters from industrial and municipal wastewater systems have been reduced, nonpoint sources of P are now contributing a greater portion of P inputs into freshwater resources. Agricultural runoff and/or erosion can be a major contributor to this nonpoint source pollution. Continued inputs of fertilizer and manure P in excess of...
Author(s)
Lee W. JacobsBrian J. Teppen
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 13: Nutrient Management with Water Treatment Residuals
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2001
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20010101)2001:1L.864;1-
DOI10.2175/193864701784993876
Volume / Issue2001 / 1
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)864 - 877
Copyright2001
Word count501

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Lee W. Jacobs# Brian J. Teppen. ALUM WTR AS AN AMENDMENT FOR PHOSPHORUS-ENRICHED SOILS. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 6 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-288353CITANCHOR>.
Lee W. Jacobs# Brian J. Teppen. ALUM WTR AS AN AMENDMENT FOR PHOSPHORUS-ENRICHED SOILS. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 6, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-288353CITANCHOR.
Lee W. Jacobs# Brian J. Teppen
ALUM WTR AS AN AMENDMENT FOR PHOSPHORUS-ENRICHED SOILS
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 6, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-288353CITANCHOR