lastID = -288354
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
CAN WATER TREATMENT RESIDUALS BE INTEGRATED INTO BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO REDUCE NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION OF THE CHESAPEAKE BAY BY AGRICULTURAL PHOSPHORUS?
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 13:54:18 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 13:54:17 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:57:33 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 20:44:27 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 20:44:26 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 20:44:25 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
CAN WATER TREATMENT RESIDUALS BE INTEGRATED INTO BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO REDUCE NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION OF THE CHESAPEAKE BAY BY AGRICULTURAL PHOSPHORUS?

CAN WATER TREATMENT RESIDUALS BE INTEGRATED INTO BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO REDUCE NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION OF THE CHESAPEAKE BAY BY AGRICULTURAL PHOSPHORUS?

CAN WATER TREATMENT RESIDUALS BE INTEGRATED INTO BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO REDUCE NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION OF THE CHESAPEAKE BAY BY AGRICULTURAL PHOSPHORUS?

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
CAN WATER TREATMENT RESIDUALS BE INTEGRATED INTO BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO REDUCE NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION OF THE CHESAPEAKE BAY BY AGRICULTURAL PHOSPHORUS?
Abstract
Phosphorus (P) enrichment in the Chesapeake Bay, Delaware's Inland Bays and their tributaries by surface and subsurface runoff from agricultural fields has been implicated in the degradation of water quality in these important surface waters. In 1998, the State of Maryland passed legislation requiring the development and implementation of N and P-based management plans for agricultural systems using fertilizers by 2001 and for those using organic wastes (manures, biosolids) by 2005. The State of Virginia passed similar legislation in 1999, focusing on N and P-based management plans for the poultry industry. In June of 1999, the State of Delaware passed a Nutrient Management Act which restricts the amount of P that can be applied to “high P” soils. In addition to the state nutrient management laws and associated regulations, Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) agreements have been negotiated between state environmental agencies in Delaware (1997) and Virginia (1998) and USEPA that have identified P as a key factor in the nonpoint source pollution of many streams, rivers, ponds, and bays and called for the development of pollution control strategies to reduce P losses to surface waters. Maryland does not have a TMDL agreement but a lawsuit has been filed to compel USEPA to establish TMDLs for impaired water bodies in that state.Many soils in this watershed are now considered “excessive” in soil test P from an agronomic standpoint. This has raised serious questions about the potential for soluble and particulate P from agricultural fields to contribute to nonpoint source pollution of the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. A major contributing factor to the widespread distribution of high P soils in this watershed has been the long-term use of animal wastes, alone or in conjunction with commercial fertilizer P. This has resulted in an accumulation of P in soils with time, which increases the likelihood of P losses in runoff and eventually to the leaching and subsurface runoff of P in some soils. The traditional approach to reduce P losses from soils to water has been to install buffer strips, grassed waterways, use fall cover crops, and the like. While these practices are effective at trapping sediments (particulate P) they have little influence on the loss of soluble P. Recent research in the U.S. and some European countries has evaluated the effectiveness of water treatment residuals (WTRs) as soil amendments for buffer zones that are installed to reduce the transport of soluble P from agricultural soils to surface waters. This presentation discusses an approach to evaluate, demonstrate, and integrate into existing water quality programs the use of WTRs as components of best management practices (BMPs) for P control in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Phosphorus (P) enrichment in the Chesapeake Bay, Delaware's Inland Bays and their tributaries by surface and subsurface runoff from agricultural fields has been implicated in the degradation of water quality in these important surface waters. In 1998, the State of Maryland passed legislation requiring the development and implementation of N and P-based management plans for agricultural systems...
Author(s)
J. T. SimsN. J. LukaR. A. Eaton
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 13: Nutrient Management with Water Treatment Residuals
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2001
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20010101)2001:1L.878;1-
DOI10.2175/193864701784994000
Volume / Issue2001 / 1
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)878 - 883
Copyright2001
Word count464

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'CAN WATER TREATMENT RESIDUALS BE INTEGRATED INTO BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO REDUCE NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION OF THE CHESAPEAKE BAY BY AGRICULTURAL PHOSPHORUS?'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
CAN WATER TREATMENT RESIDUALS BE INTEGRATED INTO BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO REDUCE NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION OF THE CHESAPEAKE BAY BY AGRICULTURAL PHOSPHORUS?
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-288354
Get access
-288354
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'CAN WATER TREATMENT RESIDUALS BE INTEGRATED INTO BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO REDUCE NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION OF THE CHESAPEAKE BAY BY AGRICULTURAL PHOSPHORUS?'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
CAN WATER TREATMENT RESIDUALS BE INTEGRATED INTO BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO REDUCE NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION OF THE CHESAPEAKE BAY BY AGRICULTURAL PHOSPHORUS?
Abstract
Phosphorus (P) enrichment in the Chesapeake Bay, Delaware's Inland Bays and their tributaries by surface and subsurface runoff from agricultural fields has been implicated in the degradation of water quality in these important surface waters. In 1998, the State of Maryland passed legislation requiring the development and implementation of N and P-based management plans for agricultural systems using fertilizers by 2001 and for those using organic wastes (manures, biosolids) by 2005. The State of Virginia passed similar legislation in 1999, focusing on N and P-based management plans for the poultry industry. In June of 1999, the State of Delaware passed a Nutrient Management Act which restricts the amount of P that can be applied to “high P” soils. In addition to the state nutrient management laws and associated regulations, Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) agreements have been negotiated between state environmental agencies in Delaware (1997) and Virginia (1998) and USEPA that have identified P as a key factor in the nonpoint source pollution of many streams, rivers, ponds, and bays and called for the development of pollution control strategies to reduce P losses to surface waters. Maryland does not have a TMDL agreement but a lawsuit has been filed to compel USEPA to establish TMDLs for impaired water bodies in that state.Many soils in this watershed are now considered “excessive” in soil test P from an agronomic standpoint. This has raised serious questions about the potential for soluble and particulate P from agricultural fields to contribute to nonpoint source pollution of the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. A major contributing factor to the widespread distribution of high P soils in this watershed has been the long-term use of animal wastes, alone or in conjunction with commercial fertilizer P. This has resulted in an accumulation of P in soils with time, which increases the likelihood of P losses in runoff and eventually to the leaching and subsurface runoff of P in some soils. The traditional approach to reduce P losses from soils to water has been to install buffer strips, grassed waterways, use fall cover crops, and the like. While these practices are effective at trapping sediments (particulate P) they have little influence on the loss of soluble P. Recent research in the U.S. and some European countries has evaluated the effectiveness of water treatment residuals (WTRs) as soil amendments for buffer zones that are installed to reduce the transport of soluble P from agricultural soils to surface waters. This presentation discusses an approach to evaluate, demonstrate, and integrate into existing water quality programs the use of WTRs as components of best management practices (BMPs) for P control in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Phosphorus (P) enrichment in the Chesapeake Bay, Delaware's Inland Bays and their tributaries by surface and subsurface runoff from agricultural fields has been implicated in the degradation of water quality in these important surface waters. In 1998, the State of Maryland passed legislation requiring the development and implementation of N and P-based management plans for agricultural systems...
Author(s)
J. T. SimsN. J. LukaR. A. Eaton
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 13: Nutrient Management with Water Treatment Residuals
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2001
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20010101)2001:1L.878;1-
DOI10.2175/193864701784994000
Volume / Issue2001 / 1
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)878 - 883
Copyright2001
Word count464

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
J. T. Sims# N. J. Luka# R. A. Eaton. CAN WATER TREATMENT RESIDUALS BE INTEGRATED INTO BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO REDUCE NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION OF THE CHESAPEAKE BAY BY AGRICULTURAL PHOSPHORUS?. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 8 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-288354CITANCHOR>.
J. T. Sims# N. J. Luka# R. A. Eaton. CAN WATER TREATMENT RESIDUALS BE INTEGRATED INTO BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO REDUCE NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION OF THE CHESAPEAKE BAY BY AGRICULTURAL PHOSPHORUS?. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 8, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-288354CITANCHOR.
J. T. Sims# N. J. Luka# R. A. Eaton
CAN WATER TREATMENT RESIDUALS BE INTEGRATED INTO BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO REDUCE NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION OF THE CHESAPEAKE BAY BY AGRICULTURAL PHOSPHORUS?
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 8, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-288354CITANCHOR