lastID = -289306
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Comparing abiotic and biotic parameters when assessing streams within a geologically diverse area (Bartow County, GA)
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 16:52:32 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-06 16:52:31 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 02:48:28 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 21:09:56 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:09:55 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Comparing abiotic and biotic parameters when assessing streams within a geologically diverse area (Bartow County, GA)

Comparing abiotic and biotic parameters when assessing streams within a geologically diverse area (Bartow County, GA)

Comparing abiotic and biotic parameters when assessing streams within a geologically diverse area (Bartow County, GA)

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Comparing abiotic and biotic parameters when assessing streams within a geologically diverse area (Bartow County, GA)
Abstract
During the summer of 2000, we sampled twenty-two stream sites in Bartow County (Georgia) for fish, macro-invertebrates, water quality, habitat condition, and bacterial indicators as part of a county-wide watershed assessment. Three major geological regions occur within the county (to the west rocks are mainly limestone, to the north shales and sandstones, and to the east and southeast harder metamorphic rocks). Because the county is so geologically diverse yet all sites are within the same drainage basin, this data set provides a rare opportunity to examine the influence of watershed geology within a relatively small geographic area on parameters and metrics traditionally used to assess anthropogenic impacts.Principal component analysis (PCA) and other comparisons indicate that most biotic and abiotic parameters over all sites are related to one another in ways expected among sites that vary due to anthropogenic impacts. Multimetrics developed for fish and for invertebrates reflected trends along the primary PCA ‘water quality’ factor (turbidity, suspended solids, and BOD), whereas site geology did not reflect trends across this factor. As expected dissolved ions (as well as alkalinity and pH) were strongly related to watershed geology, but other less obvious water quality parameters such as nitrate were also associated with geologic location.Most individual metrics that are traditionally used to assess invertebrate and fish communities did not appear to be influenced by geology, but rather by anthropogenic habitat and water changes. In addition, differences in taxonomic composition of invertebrate communities were associated with watershed geology. Any given invertebrate community within the western limestone region was most similar (based on similarity indices of species composition) to other communities within this same region. Communities within the other two regions were not similar to western communities, but not distinctly different from each other. Because water chemistry between streams of western limestone and streams of northern shale-sandstone are more similar, geological influences on invertebrate species distribution may reflect physical stream characteristics (such as streambed morphology and substrate characteristics) rather than water chemistry.While underlying geology strongly affected many water quality parameters, biotic measures were relatively independent of these water quality effects, indicating biotic parameters are reliable in assessing degradation in a geologically diverse basin.
During the summer of 2000, we sampled twenty-two stream sites in Bartow County (Georgia) for fish, macro-invertebrates, water quality, habitat condition, and bacterial indicators as part of a county-wide watershed assessment. Three major geological regions occur within the county (to the west rocks are mainly limestone, to the north shales and sandstones, and to the east and southeast harder...
Author(s)
Joseph M. DirnbergerWilliam EnsignHeather SuttonDonald McGarey
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 7: Habitat Monitoring and Assessment
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2002
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20020101)2002:2L.782;1-
DOI10.2175/193864702785664978
Volume / Issue2002 / 2
Content sourceWatershed Conference
First / last page(s)782 - 800
Copyright2002
Word count375

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Comparing abiotic and biotic parameters when assessing streams within a geologically diverse area (Bartow County, GA)'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Comparing abiotic and biotic parameters when assessing streams within a geologically diverse area (Bartow County, GA)
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-289306
Get access
-289306
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Comparing abiotic and biotic parameters when assessing streams within a geologically diverse area (Bartow County, GA)'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Comparing abiotic and biotic parameters when assessing streams within a geologically diverse area (Bartow County, GA)
Abstract
During the summer of 2000, we sampled twenty-two stream sites in Bartow County (Georgia) for fish, macro-invertebrates, water quality, habitat condition, and bacterial indicators as part of a county-wide watershed assessment. Three major geological regions occur within the county (to the west rocks are mainly limestone, to the north shales and sandstones, and to the east and southeast harder metamorphic rocks). Because the county is so geologically diverse yet all sites are within the same drainage basin, this data set provides a rare opportunity to examine the influence of watershed geology within a relatively small geographic area on parameters and metrics traditionally used to assess anthropogenic impacts.Principal component analysis (PCA) and other comparisons indicate that most biotic and abiotic parameters over all sites are related to one another in ways expected among sites that vary due to anthropogenic impacts. Multimetrics developed for fish and for invertebrates reflected trends along the primary PCA ‘water quality’ factor (turbidity, suspended solids, and BOD), whereas site geology did not reflect trends across this factor. As expected dissolved ions (as well as alkalinity and pH) were strongly related to watershed geology, but other less obvious water quality parameters such as nitrate were also associated with geologic location.Most individual metrics that are traditionally used to assess invertebrate and fish communities did not appear to be influenced by geology, but rather by anthropogenic habitat and water changes. In addition, differences in taxonomic composition of invertebrate communities were associated with watershed geology. Any given invertebrate community within the western limestone region was most similar (based on similarity indices of species composition) to other communities within this same region. Communities within the other two regions were not similar to western communities, but not distinctly different from each other. Because water chemistry between streams of western limestone and streams of northern shale-sandstone are more similar, geological influences on invertebrate species distribution may reflect physical stream characteristics (such as streambed morphology and substrate characteristics) rather than water chemistry.While underlying geology strongly affected many water quality parameters, biotic measures were relatively independent of these water quality effects, indicating biotic parameters are reliable in assessing degradation in a geologically diverse basin.
During the summer of 2000, we sampled twenty-two stream sites in Bartow County (Georgia) for fish, macro-invertebrates, water quality, habitat condition, and bacterial indicators as part of a county-wide watershed assessment. Three major geological regions occur within the county (to the west rocks are mainly limestone, to the north shales and sandstones, and to the east and southeast harder...
Author(s)
Joseph M. DirnbergerWilliam EnsignHeather SuttonDonald McGarey
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 7: Habitat Monitoring and Assessment
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2002
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20020101)2002:2L.782;1-
DOI10.2175/193864702785664978
Volume / Issue2002 / 2
Content sourceWatershed Conference
First / last page(s)782 - 800
Copyright2002
Word count375

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2025 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Joseph M. Dirnberger# William Ensign# Heather Sutton# Donald McGarey. Comparing abiotic and biotic parameters when assessing streams within a geologically diverse area (Bartow County, GA). Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 16 Oct. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-289306CITANCHOR>.
Joseph M. Dirnberger# William Ensign# Heather Sutton# Donald McGarey. Comparing abiotic and biotic parameters when assessing streams within a geologically diverse area (Bartow County, GA). Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed October 16, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-289306CITANCHOR.
Joseph M. Dirnberger# William Ensign# Heather Sutton# Donald McGarey
Comparing abiotic and biotic parameters when assessing streams within a geologically diverse area (Bartow County, GA)
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
October 16, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-289306CITANCHOR