lastID = -290698
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
CHROMIUM-CONTAMINATED SOIL TREATMENT BY IN-SITU STABILIZATION
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-01-31 20:56:54 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 20:56:53 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
CHROMIUM-CONTAMINATED SOIL TREATMENT BY IN-SITU STABILIZATION

CHROMIUM-CONTAMINATED SOIL TREATMENT BY IN-SITU STABILIZATION

CHROMIUM-CONTAMINATED SOIL TREATMENT BY IN-SITU STABILIZATION

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
CHROMIUM-CONTAMINATED SOIL TREATMENT BY IN-SITU STABILIZATION
Abstract
There is the potential for indigenous bacteria at contaminated sites to transform toxic hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) to less toxic trivalent chromium (Cr(III)) and/or precipitate the chromium such that it sorbs to the aquifer solids in situ. In laboratory column experiments with contaminated site soil, the addition of molasses stimulated these processes by indigenous bacteria, such that effluent water from the columns contained less chromium than control columns and the chromium dropped below the drinking water limit of 0.1 mg/L within 4 to 19 days. The presence of various bacterial electron acceptors impacted the removal of chromium, with nitrate resulting in the greatest chromium removal. After selected periods of flushing amended ground water through the columns, removing the amendments from the flushing water did not result in effluent chromium concentrations increasing above the drinking water limit. In addition, batch equilibrium tests with the post treated soil indicated that most of the chromium removal that occurred was irreversibly associated with the soil such that even acid and oxidizing conditions did not extract the majority of the chromium. The results indicate that in situ stabilization by enhanced bioactivity may be a viable remediation method and that risks associated with later re-release of the chromium into the ground water may be minimal.
There is the potential for indigenous bacteria at contaminated sites to transform toxic hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) to less toxic trivalent chromium (Cr(III)) and/or precipitate the chromium such that it sorbs to the aquifer solids in situ. In laboratory column experiments with contaminated site soil, the addition of molasses stimulated these processes by indigenous bacteria, such that effluent...
Author(s)
Angela R. BielefeldtCathy A. Vos
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 65: Remediation and Leachate Treatment
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2004
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20040101)2004:10L.267;1-
DOI10.2175/193864704784131545
Volume / Issue2004 / 10
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)267 - 275
Copyright2004
Word count214

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'CHROMIUM-CONTAMINATED SOIL TREATMENT BY IN-SITU STABILIZATION'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
CHROMIUM-CONTAMINATED SOIL TREATMENT BY IN-SITU STABILIZATION
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-290698
Get access
-290698
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'CHROMIUM-CONTAMINATED SOIL TREATMENT BY IN-SITU STABILIZATION'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
CHROMIUM-CONTAMINATED SOIL TREATMENT BY IN-SITU STABILIZATION
Abstract
There is the potential for indigenous bacteria at contaminated sites to transform toxic hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) to less toxic trivalent chromium (Cr(III)) and/or precipitate the chromium such that it sorbs to the aquifer solids in situ. In laboratory column experiments with contaminated site soil, the addition of molasses stimulated these processes by indigenous bacteria, such that effluent water from the columns contained less chromium than control columns and the chromium dropped below the drinking water limit of 0.1 mg/L within 4 to 19 days. The presence of various bacterial electron acceptors impacted the removal of chromium, with nitrate resulting in the greatest chromium removal. After selected periods of flushing amended ground water through the columns, removing the amendments from the flushing water did not result in effluent chromium concentrations increasing above the drinking water limit. In addition, batch equilibrium tests with the post treated soil indicated that most of the chromium removal that occurred was irreversibly associated with the soil such that even acid and oxidizing conditions did not extract the majority of the chromium. The results indicate that in situ stabilization by enhanced bioactivity may be a viable remediation method and that risks associated with later re-release of the chromium into the ground water may be minimal.
There is the potential for indigenous bacteria at contaminated sites to transform toxic hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) to less toxic trivalent chromium (Cr(III)) and/or precipitate the chromium such that it sorbs to the aquifer solids in situ. In laboratory column experiments with contaminated site soil, the addition of molasses stimulated these processes by indigenous bacteria, such that effluent...
Author(s)
Angela R. BielefeldtCathy A. Vos
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 65: Remediation and Leachate Treatment
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2004
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20040101)2004:10L.267;1-
DOI10.2175/193864704784131545
Volume / Issue2004 / 10
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)267 - 275
Copyright2004
Word count214

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Angela R. Bielefeldt# Cathy A. Vos. CHROMIUM-CONTAMINATED SOIL TREATMENT BY IN-SITU STABILIZATION. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 7 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-290698CITANCHOR>.
Angela R. Bielefeldt# Cathy A. Vos. CHROMIUM-CONTAMINATED SOIL TREATMENT BY IN-SITU STABILIZATION. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 7, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-290698CITANCHOR.
Angela R. Bielefeldt# Cathy A. Vos
CHROMIUM-CONTAMINATED SOIL TREATMENT BY IN-SITU STABILIZATION
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 7, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-290698CITANCHOR