lastID = -291048
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
10 YEARS OF EXPERIENCES OF AN MBBR PROCESS FOR POST-DENITRIFICATION
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-01-31 18:44:39 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 18:44:38 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
10 YEARS OF EXPERIENCES OF AN MBBR PROCESS FOR POST-DENITRIFICATION

10 YEARS OF EXPERIENCES OF AN MBBR PROCESS FOR POST-DENITRIFICATION

10 YEARS OF EXPERIENCES OF AN MBBR PROCESS FOR POST-DENITRIFICATION

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
10 YEARS OF EXPERIENCES OF AN MBBR PROCESS FOR POST-DENITRIFICATION
Abstract
Problems with eutrophication and algae blooms initiated the need for enhanced nutrient removal at European wastewater treatment plants in the end of the eighties. When upgrading the two WWTPs in Malmö, site specific upgrading concepts had to be considered because of the existing plant structures. As phosphorus removal already was implemented, the upgrading was focused on enhanced nitrogen removal. The key element in the upgrading procedure was the retrofit with an appropriate post-denitrification process. A newly developed concept with a moving bed biological reactor process was found to be cost-effective. Pilot plant tests with an MBBR process for post-denitrification were performed for demonstration purpose and to get some ideas for proper design criteria. The later experiences from the full-scale plant operation showed good agreement with the selected design criteria from the pilot plant data. The future effluent standards could be met by the upgrading of the plants. The pilot plant tests as well as the experiences from full-scale operation pointed out the need for a control system for external carbon dosage. The control action was based on the instantaneous nitrate load calculated from on-line measurements of nitrate and wastewater flow. The need for an active control of the phosphorus concentration in the MBBR process was also stressed by the experiences.
Problems with eutrophication and algae blooms initiated the need for enhanced nutrient removal at European wastewater treatment plants in the end of the eighties. When upgrading the two WWTPs in Malmö, site specific upgrading concepts had to be considered because of the existing plant structures. As phosphorus removal already was implemented, the upgrading was focused on enhanced nitrogen...
Author(s)
K. TäljemarkH. AspegrenC. GruvbergerN. HannerU. NybergB. Andersson
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 4: Meeting the Challenges of Full-Scale Implementation of Hybrid Fixed Suspended Growth Processes (IFAS and MBBR); European and North American Case Studies
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2004
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20040101)2004:16L.355;1-
DOI10.2175/193864704784147269
Volume / Issue2004 / 16
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)355 - 366
Copyright2004
Word count220

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to '10 YEARS OF EXPERIENCES OF AN MBBR PROCESS FOR POST-DENITRIFICATION'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
10 YEARS OF EXPERIENCES OF AN MBBR PROCESS FOR POST-DENITRIFICATION
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-291048
Get access
-291048
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to '10 YEARS OF EXPERIENCES OF AN MBBR PROCESS FOR POST-DENITRIFICATION'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
10 YEARS OF EXPERIENCES OF AN MBBR PROCESS FOR POST-DENITRIFICATION
Abstract
Problems with eutrophication and algae blooms initiated the need for enhanced nutrient removal at European wastewater treatment plants in the end of the eighties. When upgrading the two WWTPs in Malmö, site specific upgrading concepts had to be considered because of the existing plant structures. As phosphorus removal already was implemented, the upgrading was focused on enhanced nitrogen removal. The key element in the upgrading procedure was the retrofit with an appropriate post-denitrification process. A newly developed concept with a moving bed biological reactor process was found to be cost-effective. Pilot plant tests with an MBBR process for post-denitrification were performed for demonstration purpose and to get some ideas for proper design criteria. The later experiences from the full-scale plant operation showed good agreement with the selected design criteria from the pilot plant data. The future effluent standards could be met by the upgrading of the plants. The pilot plant tests as well as the experiences from full-scale operation pointed out the need for a control system for external carbon dosage. The control action was based on the instantaneous nitrate load calculated from on-line measurements of nitrate and wastewater flow. The need for an active control of the phosphorus concentration in the MBBR process was also stressed by the experiences.
Problems with eutrophication and algae blooms initiated the need for enhanced nutrient removal at European wastewater treatment plants in the end of the eighties. When upgrading the two WWTPs in Malmö, site specific upgrading concepts had to be considered because of the existing plant structures. As phosphorus removal already was implemented, the upgrading was focused on enhanced nitrogen...
Author(s)
K. TäljemarkH. AspegrenC. GruvbergerN. HannerU. NybergB. Andersson
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 4: Meeting the Challenges of Full-Scale Implementation of Hybrid Fixed Suspended Growth Processes (IFAS and MBBR); European and North American Case Studies
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2004
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20040101)2004:16L.355;1-
DOI10.2175/193864704784147269
Volume / Issue2004 / 16
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)355 - 366
Copyright2004
Word count220

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
K. Tä#ljemark# H. Aspegren# C. Gruvberger# N. Hanner# U. Nyberg# B. Andersson. 10 YEARS OF EXPERIENCES OF AN MBBR PROCESS FOR POST-DENITRIFICATION. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 3 Jul. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-291048CITANCHOR>.
K. Tä#ljemark# H. Aspegren# C. Gruvberger# N. Hanner# U. Nyberg# B. Andersson. 10 YEARS OF EXPERIENCES OF AN MBBR PROCESS FOR POST-DENITRIFICATION. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed July 3, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-291048CITANCHOR.
K. Tä#ljemark# H. Aspegren# C. Gruvberger# N. Hanner# U. Nyberg# B. Andersson
10 YEARS OF EXPERIENCES OF AN MBBR PROCESS FOR POST-DENITRIFICATION
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
July 3, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-291048CITANCHOR