lastID = -291277
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Peracetic Acid vs. Chlorine and Caustic in an Industrial Air Scrubber
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-03-27 00:06:00 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 02:47:52 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 02:47:51 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 02:47:50 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Peracetic Acid vs. Chlorine and Caustic in an Industrial Air Scrubber

Peracetic Acid vs. Chlorine and Caustic in an Industrial Air Scrubber

Peracetic Acid vs. Chlorine and Caustic in an Industrial Air Scrubber

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Peracetic Acid vs. Chlorine and Caustic in an Industrial Air Scrubber
Abstract
Peracetic acid (PAA) was evaluated against chlorine and caustic in a 60,000 cfm air scrubber at California Spray Dry, a large animal rendering plant located in Stockton CA. The air scrubber had been treated with chlorine and sodium hydroxide in order to remove as much odor causing compounds as possible. Though the scrubber treatment was kept under very good control, daily odor complaints from the local community persisted. Also, operation and maintenance on the scrubbers was burdensome due to scale precipitation caused by the high pH water. Peracetic acid (PAA) was tested in order to determine the relative effectiveness of PAA vs. chlorine and caustic. The PAA performed much better as it removed both sulfide and ammonia in a single stage and kept the scrubber clean so that weekly acid washing was no longer necessary.
Peracetic acid (PAA) was evaluated against chlorine and caustic in a 60,000 cfm air scrubber at California Spray Dry, a large animal rendering plant located in Stockton CA. The air scrubber had been treated with chlorine and sodium hydroxide in order to remove as much odor causing compounds as possible. Though the scrubber treatment was kept under very good control, daily odor complaints from the...
Author(s)
Reed Semenza
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 5: Multi-Staged Odor Control Systems
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2004
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20040101)2004:3L.370;1-
DOI10.2175/193864704784327322
Volume / Issue2004 / 3
Content sourceOdors and Air Pollutants Conference
First / last page(s)370 - 373
Copyright2004
Word count146

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Peracetic Acid vs. Chlorine and Caustic in an Industrial Air Scrubber'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Peracetic Acid vs. Chlorine and Caustic in an Industrial Air Scrubber
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-291277
Get access
-291277
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Peracetic Acid vs. Chlorine and Caustic in an Industrial Air Scrubber'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Peracetic Acid vs. Chlorine and Caustic in an Industrial Air Scrubber
Abstract
Peracetic acid (PAA) was evaluated against chlorine and caustic in a 60,000 cfm air scrubber at California Spray Dry, a large animal rendering plant located in Stockton CA. The air scrubber had been treated with chlorine and sodium hydroxide in order to remove as much odor causing compounds as possible. Though the scrubber treatment was kept under very good control, daily odor complaints from the local community persisted. Also, operation and maintenance on the scrubbers was burdensome due to scale precipitation caused by the high pH water. Peracetic acid (PAA) was tested in order to determine the relative effectiveness of PAA vs. chlorine and caustic. The PAA performed much better as it removed both sulfide and ammonia in a single stage and kept the scrubber clean so that weekly acid washing was no longer necessary.
Peracetic acid (PAA) was evaluated against chlorine and caustic in a 60,000 cfm air scrubber at California Spray Dry, a large animal rendering plant located in Stockton CA. The air scrubber had been treated with chlorine and sodium hydroxide in order to remove as much odor causing compounds as possible. Though the scrubber treatment was kept under very good control, daily odor complaints from the...
Author(s)
Reed Semenza
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 5: Multi-Staged Odor Control Systems
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2004
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20040101)2004:3L.370;1-
DOI10.2175/193864704784327322
Volume / Issue2004 / 3
Content sourceOdors and Air Pollutants Conference
First / last page(s)370 - 373
Copyright2004
Word count146

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Reed Semenza. Peracetic Acid vs. Chlorine and Caustic in an Industrial Air Scrubber. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 10 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-291277CITANCHOR>.
Reed Semenza. Peracetic Acid vs. Chlorine and Caustic in an Industrial Air Scrubber. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 10, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-291277CITANCHOR.
Reed Semenza
Peracetic Acid vs. Chlorine and Caustic in an Industrial Air Scrubber
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 10, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-291277CITANCHOR