lastID = -291604
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
COMBUSTION AND LAND APPLICATION CAN BOTH BE BENEFICIAL?
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 20:01:12 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 21:07:30 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:07:29 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
COMBUSTION AND LAND APPLICATION CAN BOTH BE BENEFICIAL?

COMBUSTION AND LAND APPLICATION CAN BOTH BE BENEFICIAL?

COMBUSTION AND LAND APPLICATION CAN BOTH BE BENEFICIAL?

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
COMBUSTION AND LAND APPLICATION CAN BOTH BE BENEFICIAL?
Abstract
Both combustion and land application have played important roles in biosolids management practices for many decades. Land application in almost all of its forms has been proclaimed as beneficial use. By contrast, many have viewed combustion as a “disposal only” option, even if energy is recovered in the process and the resulting ash reused. These views and opinions are often proclaimed with no basis or criteria to support the conclusion. Five criteria are presented in this paper for judging whether a management practice is beneficial or not. When judged by these criteria, one can conclude that many combustion installations are beneifical. One can also conclude that land application is beneficial in most, but perhaps not all, installations.
Both combustion and land application have played important roles in biosolids management practices for many decades. Land application in almost all of its forms has been proclaimed as beneficial use. By contrast, many have viewed combustion as a “disposal only” option, even if energy is recovered in the process and the resulting ash reused. These views and opinions are often proclaimed...
Author(s)
Roger Tim HaugF. Michael LewisPeter Brady
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 85: Incineration and Thermal Drying Are Now Important Technologies
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2004
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20040101)2004:8L.217;1-
DOI10.2175/193864704784136522
Volume / Issue2004 / 8
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)217 - 236
Copyright2004
Word count125

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'COMBUSTION AND LAND APPLICATION CAN BOTH BE BENEFICIAL?'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
COMBUSTION AND LAND APPLICATION CAN BOTH BE BENEFICIAL?
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-291604
Get access
-291604
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'COMBUSTION AND LAND APPLICATION CAN BOTH BE BENEFICIAL?'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
COMBUSTION AND LAND APPLICATION CAN BOTH BE BENEFICIAL?
Abstract
Both combustion and land application have played important roles in biosolids management practices for many decades. Land application in almost all of its forms has been proclaimed as beneficial use. By contrast, many have viewed combustion as a “disposal only” option, even if energy is recovered in the process and the resulting ash reused. These views and opinions are often proclaimed with no basis or criteria to support the conclusion. Five criteria are presented in this paper for judging whether a management practice is beneficial or not. When judged by these criteria, one can conclude that many combustion installations are beneifical. One can also conclude that land application is beneficial in most, but perhaps not all, installations.
Both combustion and land application have played important roles in biosolids management practices for many decades. Land application in almost all of its forms has been proclaimed as beneficial use. By contrast, many have viewed combustion as a “disposal only” option, even if energy is recovered in the process and the resulting ash reused. These views and opinions are often proclaimed...
Author(s)
Roger Tim HaugF. Michael LewisPeter Brady
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 85: Incineration and Thermal Drying Are Now Important Technologies
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2004
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20040101)2004:8L.217;1-
DOI10.2175/193864704784136522
Volume / Issue2004 / 8
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)217 - 236
Copyright2004
Word count125

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Roger Tim Haug# F. Michael Lewis# Peter Brady. COMBUSTION AND LAND APPLICATION CAN BOTH BE BENEFICIAL?. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 29 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-291604CITANCHOR>.
Roger Tim Haug# F. Michael Lewis# Peter Brady. COMBUSTION AND LAND APPLICATION CAN BOTH BE BENEFICIAL?. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 29, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-291604CITANCHOR.
Roger Tim Haug# F. Michael Lewis# Peter Brady
COMBUSTION AND LAND APPLICATION CAN BOTH BE BENEFICIAL?
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 29, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-291604CITANCHOR