lastID = -292079
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
INCREASING TREATMENT PLANT WET WEATHER FLOW CAPACITY WITH COARSE MONOMEDIA FILTRATION: A CASE STUDY AT TWO NEW YORK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-02-01 00:24:25 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 00:24:24 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
INCREASING TREATMENT PLANT WET WEATHER FLOW CAPACITY WITH COARSE MONOMEDIA FILTRATION: A CASE STUDY AT TWO NEW YORK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS

INCREASING TREATMENT PLANT WET WEATHER FLOW CAPACITY WITH COARSE MONOMEDIA FILTRATION: A CASE STUDY AT TWO NEW YORK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS

INCREASING TREATMENT PLANT WET WEATHER FLOW CAPACITY WITH COARSE MONOMEDIA FILTRATION: A CASE STUDY AT TWO NEW YORK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
INCREASING TREATMENT PLANT WET WEATHER FLOW CAPACITY WITH COARSE MONOMEDIA FILTRATION: A CASE STUDY AT TWO NEW YORK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS
Abstract
Coarse Monomedia Filtration (CMF) is a proven treatment technology for tertiary treatment of wet weather flows. Utilizing a deeper filtration bed than standard tertiary filters, two Western New York facilities in the Town of Tonawanda and Niagara County were able to double their filtration capacities during wet weather events. Additionally, CMF produced significant savings in energy costs and chemical costs, which continue today.In addition to the deep bed, CMF features a large (3mm), spherically-shaped, uniformly sized media throughout the bed. The sphericity of the particles allows a greater flow volume to pass through the media. As the surface pore spaces restrict from solids adsorption, the velocity increases through the bed allowing solids capture deep throughout the filter.In 2004, the Erie County Department of Environment and Planning's Southtowns Treatment Plant finished retrofitting their conventional filters to CMF. In a unique application, the CMF will accept flow from the Southtowns Plant's Overflow Retention Facility (ORF). This primary treated stormwater effluent will be blended with secondary treated effluent before filtration. The blended effluent is expected to meet and/or exceed permit limits.In another unique application of CMF, the City of Geneva, New York has pilot tested CMF at its 4 MGD wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). In the Geneva application, CMF was used to process preliminarily treated influent wastewater during wet weather events through the CMF before blending it with secondary treated effluent prior to disinfection and discharge.One of the foremost challenges facing publicly and privately operated wastewater systems in the next several years will be complying with regulations governing combined sewer overflow (CSO) and sanitary sewer overflow (SSO) treatment under Environmental Protection Agency policy initiatives. Most systems have begun identifying and quantifying CSO's/SSO's, and decisions regarding cost-effective methods for minimizing and treating CSO/SSO flows will have major economic impact on most sewered communities. Coarse monomedia holds the promise of being a cost-effective unit process for the treatment of CSO/SSO flows at remote locations in wastewater collection systems.During the Geneva Pilot Study, 40 samples for total suspended solids (TSS) analysis were collected. Of these, 39 are considered valid. One was eliminated due to pilot plant upset.The influent TSS concentrations ranged from 46 to 210 mg/L, with an average concentration of approximately 94 mg/L.The effluent TSS concentrations ranged from 4 to 61 mg/L, with an average concentration of approximately 19 mg/L. 16 of the 19 effluent samples, approximately 83 percent, were below the 30-day discharge limitation of 30 mg/L TSS, and 18 of the 19 samples, approximately 95 percent, were below the 7-day discharge limitation of 45 mg/L TSS.The percent removal of TSS ranged from 49.2 percent to 95.7 percent, with an average removal of 79.1 percent. 6 of the 19 samples, approximately 32 percent were above the required 85 percent removal.Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) analysis is a more complicated procedure than TSS analysis. As a result, the laboratory deemed fewer results acceptable. Of the 40 BOD samples submitted for analysis, 5 results were eliminated because of significant non-conformances, and one was eliminated due to the pilot plant upset. Four (10 percent) of the valid results are estimated values because of slight deviations from acceptance criteria.The influent BOD concentrations ranged from 36 to 290 mg/L, with an average concentration of approximately 149 mg/L.The effluent BOD concentrations ranged from 14 to 140 mg/L, with an average concentration of approximately 41 mg/L. 7 of the 14 effluent samples, 50 percent, were below the 30-day discharge limitation of 30 mg/L BOD, and 11 of the 14 samples, approximately 79 percent, were below the 7-day discharge limitation of 45 mg/L BOD.The percent removal of BOD ranged from 12.5 percent to 94.4 percent, with an average removal of 61.7 percent. 3 of the 14 samples, approximately 21 percent were above the required 85 percent removal.Though conclusions from the Southtowns Plant Demonstration Project for the use of CMF on ORF effluent are not available at this time, the results of the Geneva pilot study for preliminarily treated wastewater are promising. The filters proved able to reduce the TSS and BOD concentrations in the wastewater to acceptable levels for blending. The greatest obstruction in the use of CMF to process preliminarily treated wastewater was found to be the presence of a relatively small percentage of large particles. This is not expected to be an issue at the Southtowns WWTP due to the higher level of treatment prior to CMF and demonstrates the potential for CMF as a wet weather treatment tool at many other sites throughout the country.
Coarse Monomedia Filtration (CMF) is a proven treatment technology for tertiary treatment of wet weather flows. Utilizing a deeper filtration bed than standard tertiary filters, two Western New York facilities in the Town of Tonawanda and Niagara County were able to double their filtration capacities during wet weather events. Additionally, CMF produced significant savings in energy costs and...
Author(s)
Daniel L. BentivogliLisa A. Davey
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 5A: Municipal Wastewater Treatment Processes: Wet Weather Management in Wastewater Treatment Facilities
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:16L.469;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705783868232
Volume / Issue2005 / 16
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)469 - 486
Copyright2005
Word count775

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'INCREASING TREATMENT PLANT WET WEATHER FLOW CAPACITY WITH COARSE MONOMEDIA FILTRATION: A CASE STUDY AT TWO NEW YORK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
INCREASING TREATMENT PLANT WET WEATHER FLOW CAPACITY WITH COARSE MONOMEDIA FILTRATION: A CASE STUDY AT TWO NEW YORK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-292079
Get access
-292079
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'INCREASING TREATMENT PLANT WET WEATHER FLOW CAPACITY WITH COARSE MONOMEDIA FILTRATION: A CASE STUDY AT TWO NEW YORK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
INCREASING TREATMENT PLANT WET WEATHER FLOW CAPACITY WITH COARSE MONOMEDIA FILTRATION: A CASE STUDY AT TWO NEW YORK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS
Abstract
Coarse Monomedia Filtration (CMF) is a proven treatment technology for tertiary treatment of wet weather flows. Utilizing a deeper filtration bed than standard tertiary filters, two Western New York facilities in the Town of Tonawanda and Niagara County were able to double their filtration capacities during wet weather events. Additionally, CMF produced significant savings in energy costs and chemical costs, which continue today.In addition to the deep bed, CMF features a large (3mm), spherically-shaped, uniformly sized media throughout the bed. The sphericity of the particles allows a greater flow volume to pass through the media. As the surface pore spaces restrict from solids adsorption, the velocity increases through the bed allowing solids capture deep throughout the filter.In 2004, the Erie County Department of Environment and Planning's Southtowns Treatment Plant finished retrofitting their conventional filters to CMF. In a unique application, the CMF will accept flow from the Southtowns Plant's Overflow Retention Facility (ORF). This primary treated stormwater effluent will be blended with secondary treated effluent before filtration. The blended effluent is expected to meet and/or exceed permit limits.In another unique application of CMF, the City of Geneva, New York has pilot tested CMF at its 4 MGD wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). In the Geneva application, CMF was used to process preliminarily treated influent wastewater during wet weather events through the CMF before blending it with secondary treated effluent prior to disinfection and discharge.One of the foremost challenges facing publicly and privately operated wastewater systems in the next several years will be complying with regulations governing combined sewer overflow (CSO) and sanitary sewer overflow (SSO) treatment under Environmental Protection Agency policy initiatives. Most systems have begun identifying and quantifying CSO's/SSO's, and decisions regarding cost-effective methods for minimizing and treating CSO/SSO flows will have major economic impact on most sewered communities. Coarse monomedia holds the promise of being a cost-effective unit process for the treatment of CSO/SSO flows at remote locations in wastewater collection systems.During the Geneva Pilot Study, 40 samples for total suspended solids (TSS) analysis were collected. Of these, 39 are considered valid. One was eliminated due to pilot plant upset.The influent TSS concentrations ranged from 46 to 210 mg/L, with an average concentration of approximately 94 mg/L.The effluent TSS concentrations ranged from 4 to 61 mg/L, with an average concentration of approximately 19 mg/L. 16 of the 19 effluent samples, approximately 83 percent, were below the 30-day discharge limitation of 30 mg/L TSS, and 18 of the 19 samples, approximately 95 percent, were below the 7-day discharge limitation of 45 mg/L TSS.The percent removal of TSS ranged from 49.2 percent to 95.7 percent, with an average removal of 79.1 percent. 6 of the 19 samples, approximately 32 percent were above the required 85 percent removal.Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) analysis is a more complicated procedure than TSS analysis. As a result, the laboratory deemed fewer results acceptable. Of the 40 BOD samples submitted for analysis, 5 results were eliminated because of significant non-conformances, and one was eliminated due to the pilot plant upset. Four (10 percent) of the valid results are estimated values because of slight deviations from acceptance criteria.The influent BOD concentrations ranged from 36 to 290 mg/L, with an average concentration of approximately 149 mg/L.The effluent BOD concentrations ranged from 14 to 140 mg/L, with an average concentration of approximately 41 mg/L. 7 of the 14 effluent samples, 50 percent, were below the 30-day discharge limitation of 30 mg/L BOD, and 11 of the 14 samples, approximately 79 percent, were below the 7-day discharge limitation of 45 mg/L BOD.The percent removal of BOD ranged from 12.5 percent to 94.4 percent, with an average removal of 61.7 percent. 3 of the 14 samples, approximately 21 percent were above the required 85 percent removal.Though conclusions from the Southtowns Plant Demonstration Project for the use of CMF on ORF effluent are not available at this time, the results of the Geneva pilot study for preliminarily treated wastewater are promising. The filters proved able to reduce the TSS and BOD concentrations in the wastewater to acceptable levels for blending. The greatest obstruction in the use of CMF to process preliminarily treated wastewater was found to be the presence of a relatively small percentage of large particles. This is not expected to be an issue at the Southtowns WWTP due to the higher level of treatment prior to CMF and demonstrates the potential for CMF as a wet weather treatment tool at many other sites throughout the country.
Coarse Monomedia Filtration (CMF) is a proven treatment technology for tertiary treatment of wet weather flows. Utilizing a deeper filtration bed than standard tertiary filters, two Western New York facilities in the Town of Tonawanda and Niagara County were able to double their filtration capacities during wet weather events. Additionally, CMF produced significant savings in energy costs and...
Author(s)
Daniel L. BentivogliLisa A. Davey
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 5A: Municipal Wastewater Treatment Processes: Wet Weather Management in Wastewater Treatment Facilities
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:16L.469;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705783868232
Volume / Issue2005 / 16
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)469 - 486
Copyright2005
Word count775

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Daniel L. Bentivogli# Lisa A. Davey. INCREASING TREATMENT PLANT WET WEATHER FLOW CAPACITY WITH COARSE MONOMEDIA FILTRATION: A CASE STUDY AT TWO NEW YORK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 6 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-292079CITANCHOR>.
Daniel L. Bentivogli# Lisa A. Davey. INCREASING TREATMENT PLANT WET WEATHER FLOW CAPACITY WITH COARSE MONOMEDIA FILTRATION: A CASE STUDY AT TWO NEW YORK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 6, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292079CITANCHOR.
Daniel L. Bentivogli# Lisa A. Davey
INCREASING TREATMENT PLANT WET WEATHER FLOW CAPACITY WITH COARSE MONOMEDIA FILTRATION: A CASE STUDY AT TWO NEW YORK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 6, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292079CITANCHOR