lastID = -292297
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
AIR EMISSION FROM SLUDGE FLUID BED INCINERATION SYSTEM
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 13:47:25 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:47:07 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:47:06 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 19:24:58 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 19:24:57 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
AIR EMISSION FROM SLUDGE FLUID BED INCINERATION SYSTEM

AIR EMISSION FROM SLUDGE FLUID BED INCINERATION SYSTEM

AIR EMISSION FROM SLUDGE FLUID BED INCINERATION SYSTEM

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
AIR EMISSION FROM SLUDGE FLUID BED INCINERATION SYSTEM
Abstract
Fluid bed incineration has been gaining more attention over the last few years as municipalities and industries focus on reducing sludge volumes and producing class A type sludge. A concern surrounding incineration has to do with emissions from the combustion process. In general, these concerns can be divided into 3 areas: heavy metal emissions, particulate emissions, and gaseous emissions (nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide). In this paper air emissions recorded at several Infilco Degremont sludge incineration plants are presented. The ultimate goal of this paper is to create a database of recorded emissions for all air pollutants from a sludge bed incineration plant. The database will be a useful tool for engineers and regulators when establishing air requirements and designing air pollution control systems. Heavy Metal Emission Analysis of the data shows that out of ten metals, mercury and selenium had the lowest removal efficiencies. Mercury and selenium also had lower boiling point temperatures compared to other metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, nickel, lead, zinc, and beryllium). On average, removal efficiencies for arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, nickel, lead, zinc, and beryllium were in excess of 98%. Furthermore, a linear relationship was observed between metal emission and total particulate removal for cadmium, zinc, copper and lead. However, a similar relationship could not be established between the two parameters for arsenic, chromium, nickel, selenium, beryllium and mercury. When metal removal efficiency was compared to concentration of the metal in the inlet sludge, results indicated that the removal efficiency decreased significantly with decreasing inlet concentrations for selenium and mercury. Removal efficiencies were also slightly lower for cadmium, chromium, copper, nickel, lead, and zinc at lower inlet concentrations. Particulate Emission When total particulate emission levels of thirteen plants were compared to US EPA requirement (1.3 lb/dry ton), all thirteen plants had emission levels within the requirement. Total particulate emissions varied between 0.01 and 1 lb per dry ton with an average of 0.25 lb per dry ton. Overall, particulate emissions were substantially lower at plants having Wet electrostatic precipitator or hydrosonic venturi scrubber. For instance, Bayshore fluid bed incineration plant had a total particulate emission level of 0.013 lb/dry ton, which was significantly lower than the emission level reported by N W Bergen Plant No. 1 (0.35 lb/dry ton). The large difference between the emission levels of two plants was due to the Wet electrostatic precipitator installed after venturi scrubber at Bayshore plant Gaseous Emissions When carbon monoxide (CO) emission levels of twelve plants were compared to US EPA requirement (100 ppmv), all twelve plants had significantly lower emission levels ranging from a minimum of 0.4 ppmv to a maximum of 22.5 ppmv corrected to 7% O2. The average emission was 7.5 ppmv, which was well within the US EPA requirement of 100 ppmv. When total hydrocarbon as CH4 emission levels of eight fluid bed plants were compared to US EPA requirement (100 ppmv), all eight plants had significantly lower emissions. The average hydrocarbon emission was 1.8 ppmv, which was significantly lower than 100 ppmv required by US EPA. The lowest and highest hydrocarbon emissions were 0.5 and 5.45 ppmv respectively. The average nitrogen dioxide (NO2) emission levels of nine plants was 33.1 ppmv, ranging from a minimum of 0.97 ppmv to a maximum of 69.36 ppmv corrected to 7% O2. Although, regulatory emission requirements for nitrogen oxide vary by location in the US, the incineration plants, which provided the data for this study, comply with the emission requirements within their localities.
Fluid bed incineration has been gaining more attention over the last few years as municipalities and industries focus on reducing sludge volumes and producing class A type sludge. A concern surrounding incineration has to do with emissions from the combustion process. In general, these concerns can be divided into 3 areas: heavy metal emissions, particulate emissions, and gaseous emissions...
Author(s)
Levent TakmazKy DangtranJon Butt
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 20: Thermal Processing B
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:2L.1218;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705783967683
Volume / Issue2005 / 2
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)1218 - 1245
Copyright2005
Word count587

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'AIR EMISSION FROM SLUDGE FLUID BED INCINERATION SYSTEM'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
AIR EMISSION FROM SLUDGE FLUID BED INCINERATION SYSTEM
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-292297
Get access
-292297
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'AIR EMISSION FROM SLUDGE FLUID BED INCINERATION SYSTEM'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
AIR EMISSION FROM SLUDGE FLUID BED INCINERATION SYSTEM
Abstract
Fluid bed incineration has been gaining more attention over the last few years as municipalities and industries focus on reducing sludge volumes and producing class A type sludge. A concern surrounding incineration has to do with emissions from the combustion process. In general, these concerns can be divided into 3 areas: heavy metal emissions, particulate emissions, and gaseous emissions (nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide). In this paper air emissions recorded at several Infilco Degremont sludge incineration plants are presented. The ultimate goal of this paper is to create a database of recorded emissions for all air pollutants from a sludge bed incineration plant. The database will be a useful tool for engineers and regulators when establishing air requirements and designing air pollution control systems. Heavy Metal Emission Analysis of the data shows that out of ten metals, mercury and selenium had the lowest removal efficiencies. Mercury and selenium also had lower boiling point temperatures compared to other metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, nickel, lead, zinc, and beryllium). On average, removal efficiencies for arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, nickel, lead, zinc, and beryllium were in excess of 98%. Furthermore, a linear relationship was observed between metal emission and total particulate removal for cadmium, zinc, copper and lead. However, a similar relationship could not be established between the two parameters for arsenic, chromium, nickel, selenium, beryllium and mercury. When metal removal efficiency was compared to concentration of the metal in the inlet sludge, results indicated that the removal efficiency decreased significantly with decreasing inlet concentrations for selenium and mercury. Removal efficiencies were also slightly lower for cadmium, chromium, copper, nickel, lead, and zinc at lower inlet concentrations. Particulate Emission When total particulate emission levels of thirteen plants were compared to US EPA requirement (1.3 lb/dry ton), all thirteen plants had emission levels within the requirement. Total particulate emissions varied between 0.01 and 1 lb per dry ton with an average of 0.25 lb per dry ton. Overall, particulate emissions were substantially lower at plants having Wet electrostatic precipitator or hydrosonic venturi scrubber. For instance, Bayshore fluid bed incineration plant had a total particulate emission level of 0.013 lb/dry ton, which was significantly lower than the emission level reported by N W Bergen Plant No. 1 (0.35 lb/dry ton). The large difference between the emission levels of two plants was due to the Wet electrostatic precipitator installed after venturi scrubber at Bayshore plant Gaseous Emissions When carbon monoxide (CO) emission levels of twelve plants were compared to US EPA requirement (100 ppmv), all twelve plants had significantly lower emission levels ranging from a minimum of 0.4 ppmv to a maximum of 22.5 ppmv corrected to 7% O2. The average emission was 7.5 ppmv, which was well within the US EPA requirement of 100 ppmv. When total hydrocarbon as CH4 emission levels of eight fluid bed plants were compared to US EPA requirement (100 ppmv), all eight plants had significantly lower emissions. The average hydrocarbon emission was 1.8 ppmv, which was significantly lower than 100 ppmv required by US EPA. The lowest and highest hydrocarbon emissions were 0.5 and 5.45 ppmv respectively. The average nitrogen dioxide (NO2) emission levels of nine plants was 33.1 ppmv, ranging from a minimum of 0.97 ppmv to a maximum of 69.36 ppmv corrected to 7% O2. Although, regulatory emission requirements for nitrogen oxide vary by location in the US, the incineration plants, which provided the data for this study, comply with the emission requirements within their localities.
Fluid bed incineration has been gaining more attention over the last few years as municipalities and industries focus on reducing sludge volumes and producing class A type sludge. A concern surrounding incineration has to do with emissions from the combustion process. In general, these concerns can be divided into 3 areas: heavy metal emissions, particulate emissions, and gaseous emissions...
Author(s)
Levent TakmazKy DangtranJon Butt
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 20: Thermal Processing B
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:2L.1218;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705783967683
Volume / Issue2005 / 2
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)1218 - 1245
Copyright2005
Word count587

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2025 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Levent Takmaz# Ky Dangtran# Jon Butt. AIR EMISSION FROM SLUDGE FLUID BED INCINERATION SYSTEM. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 28 Oct. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-292297CITANCHOR>.
Levent Takmaz# Ky Dangtran# Jon Butt. AIR EMISSION FROM SLUDGE FLUID BED INCINERATION SYSTEM. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed October 28, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292297CITANCHOR.
Levent Takmaz# Ky Dangtran# Jon Butt
AIR EMISSION FROM SLUDGE FLUID BED INCINERATION SYSTEM
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
October 28, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292297CITANCHOR