lastID = -292426
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
MORE CSO CONTROL FOR LESS DOLLARS!
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 21:33:34 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 21:33:33 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-26 22:13:53 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-26 22:13:52 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 01:41:16 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 01:41:15 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 01:41:14 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
MORE CSO CONTROL FOR LESS DOLLARS!

MORE CSO CONTROL FOR LESS DOLLARS!

MORE CSO CONTROL FOR LESS DOLLARS!

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
MORE CSO CONTROL FOR LESS DOLLARS!
Abstract
Many communities face a significant financial impact to comply with regulatory requirements for Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) control. Implementation of the required level of control brings an immediate capital cost impact as well as significant long term operations and maintenance (O&M) requirements. Therefore, the selection of CSO controls must take into consideration both the capital, as well as the operations and maintenance requirements.The regulatory requirement for CSO control varies by state. The State of Michigan requires a community to either take a demonstrative approach to assure their level of CSO control meets water quality standards at the time of discharge or take a presumptive approach requiring a higher level of CSO control, which is presumed to meet water quality standards at the time of discharge. The additional effort required to demonstrate that a control meets water quality standards, along with the risk of a failed demonstration, usually leads a community to follow a more costly presumptive approach. However, if the presumptive CSO control does not result in the facility meeting water quality standards (WQS) then retrofitting is required. Hence, both design approaches involve a risk of not meeting WQS.This paper presents a third approach in the development of the required CSO control that was utilized for a project being considered by the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department (DWSD). The approach involves the use of extensive monitoring information and analysis to allow the community to work with the regulatory authority in the development of a design criteria which addresses the needs of CSO control by focusing the CSO control alternative: on the specific water quality impairments; the effectiveness of CSO controls to eliminate these impairments; capital cost; and the operational and maintenance requirements. Using this approach, DWSD has worked with the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) to jointly develop a new CSO control standard to be used for a proposed CSO control project. DWSD is proceeding with the implementation of a CSO capture tunnel for the CSO outfalls along the Rouge River. This project is expected to save DWSD 877 million dollars in capital costs and 3.2 million dollars in annual operations and maintenance costs as compared to a project designed using the presumptive approach. In addition, the utilization of the new sizing standard reduced the frequency of overflows from a presumptive approach yielding four overflows per year to less than one overflow per year. The approach taken by DWSD during their planning of this treatment facility has demonstrated the concept of providing more CSO control for less dollars.
Many communities face a significant financial impact to comply with regulatory requirements for Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) control. Implementation of the required level of control brings an immediate capital cost impact as well as significant long term operations and maintenance (O&M) requirements. Therefore, the selection of CSO controls must take into consideration both the capital, as...
Author(s)
James SherrillGary FujitaClayton McCormackMirza Rabbaig
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 9: Better Predictions Yield Better Decisions
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:4L.510;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705784291240
Volume / Issue2005 / 4
Content sourceCollection Systems Conference
First / last page(s)510 - 518
Copyright2005
Word count426

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'MORE CSO CONTROL FOR LESS DOLLARS!'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
MORE CSO CONTROL FOR LESS DOLLARS!
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-292426
Get access
-292426
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'MORE CSO CONTROL FOR LESS DOLLARS!'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
MORE CSO CONTROL FOR LESS DOLLARS!
Abstract
Many communities face a significant financial impact to comply with regulatory requirements for Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) control. Implementation of the required level of control brings an immediate capital cost impact as well as significant long term operations and maintenance (O&M) requirements. Therefore, the selection of CSO controls must take into consideration both the capital, as well as the operations and maintenance requirements.The regulatory requirement for CSO control varies by state. The State of Michigan requires a community to either take a demonstrative approach to assure their level of CSO control meets water quality standards at the time of discharge or take a presumptive approach requiring a higher level of CSO control, which is presumed to meet water quality standards at the time of discharge. The additional effort required to demonstrate that a control meets water quality standards, along with the risk of a failed demonstration, usually leads a community to follow a more costly presumptive approach. However, if the presumptive CSO control does not result in the facility meeting water quality standards (WQS) then retrofitting is required. Hence, both design approaches involve a risk of not meeting WQS.This paper presents a third approach in the development of the required CSO control that was utilized for a project being considered by the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department (DWSD). The approach involves the use of extensive monitoring information and analysis to allow the community to work with the regulatory authority in the development of a design criteria which addresses the needs of CSO control by focusing the CSO control alternative: on the specific water quality impairments; the effectiveness of CSO controls to eliminate these impairments; capital cost; and the operational and maintenance requirements. Using this approach, DWSD has worked with the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) to jointly develop a new CSO control standard to be used for a proposed CSO control project. DWSD is proceeding with the implementation of a CSO capture tunnel for the CSO outfalls along the Rouge River. This project is expected to save DWSD 877 million dollars in capital costs and 3.2 million dollars in annual operations and maintenance costs as compared to a project designed using the presumptive approach. In addition, the utilization of the new sizing standard reduced the frequency of overflows from a presumptive approach yielding four overflows per year to less than one overflow per year. The approach taken by DWSD during their planning of this treatment facility has demonstrated the concept of providing more CSO control for less dollars.
Many communities face a significant financial impact to comply with regulatory requirements for Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) control. Implementation of the required level of control brings an immediate capital cost impact as well as significant long term operations and maintenance (O&M) requirements. Therefore, the selection of CSO controls must take into consideration both the capital, as...
Author(s)
James SherrillGary FujitaClayton McCormackMirza Rabbaig
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 9: Better Predictions Yield Better Decisions
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:4L.510;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705784291240
Volume / Issue2005 / 4
Content sourceCollection Systems Conference
First / last page(s)510 - 518
Copyright2005
Word count426

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
James Sherrill# Gary Fujita# Clayton McCormack# Mirza Rabbaig. MORE CSO CONTROL FOR LESS DOLLARS!. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 26 Sep. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-292426CITANCHOR>.
James Sherrill# Gary Fujita# Clayton McCormack# Mirza Rabbaig. MORE CSO CONTROL FOR LESS DOLLARS!. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed September 26, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292426CITANCHOR.
James Sherrill# Gary Fujita# Clayton McCormack# Mirza Rabbaig
MORE CSO CONTROL FOR LESS DOLLARS!
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
September 26, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292426CITANCHOR