lastID = -292579
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
DISINFECTION CONTACT BASIN: COVER IT, OR NOT?
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-01-31 22:07:15 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 22:07:14 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
DISINFECTION CONTACT BASIN: COVER IT, OR NOT?

DISINFECTION CONTACT BASIN: COVER IT, OR NOT?

DISINFECTION CONTACT BASIN: COVER IT, OR NOT?

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
DISINFECTION CONTACT BASIN: COVER IT, OR NOT?
Abstract
Residual chlorine loss due to ultraviolet sunlight in the chlorine disinfection contact basins were investigated at two full-scale wastewater treatment plants. The investigation compared the chlorine loss in chlorine contact basins that were covered against the basins that were open to direct sunlight. Chlorine decay due to UV-catalyzed reaction was found to be significant. The average chlorine loss across the contact basin due to sunlight photocatalytic decay at peak sunlight hours was 6.6 and 4.7 mg/L for the two plants studied. The total chlorine loss due to sunlight was about 28% and 19% of the total chlorine chemical usage at the two plants. One plant had about 36 percent reduction of total chlorine usage after they covered both chlorine contact basins, which result in approximately 37,000/year savings on chemical purchase. Covering chlorine contact basins also led to more stable chlorine demand throughout the day and throughout the year regardless of the diurnal and seasonal sunlight intensity. Therefore, it offers more stable/accurate chlorine dosage and effluent residual control, and less effort from the plant operators. A mathematical model was developed to calculate the amount of UV-catalyzed chlorine decay. The parameters in the model were determined by calibrating the model to the field observed data. Then the model was employed to evaluate the average UV-catalyzed chlorine decay rate at various average chlorine concentration in the DCB, as well as estimated total chlorine loss due to sunlight at various flow rates.
Residual chlorine loss due to ultraviolet sunlight in the chlorine disinfection contact basins were investigated at two full-scale wastewater treatment plants. The investigation compared the chlorine loss in chlorine contact basins that were covered against the basins that were open to direct sunlight. Chlorine decay due to UV-catalyzed reaction was found to be significant. The average chlorine...
Author(s)
April Z. GuTroy MitchellTamara GreenJune LengPravit ParikhJB NeethlingMark Hammer
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 94: Management of Odors and VOCs/Disinfection: Think Outside the Box: What Is the Right Disinfectant?
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:7L.7776;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705783813403
Volume / Issue2005 / 7
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)7776 - 7793
Copyright2005
Word count245

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'DISINFECTION CONTACT BASIN: COVER IT, OR NOT?'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
DISINFECTION CONTACT BASIN: COVER IT, OR NOT?
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-292579
Get access
-292579
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'DISINFECTION CONTACT BASIN: COVER IT, OR NOT?'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
DISINFECTION CONTACT BASIN: COVER IT, OR NOT?
Abstract
Residual chlorine loss due to ultraviolet sunlight in the chlorine disinfection contact basins were investigated at two full-scale wastewater treatment plants. The investigation compared the chlorine loss in chlorine contact basins that were covered against the basins that were open to direct sunlight. Chlorine decay due to UV-catalyzed reaction was found to be significant. The average chlorine loss across the contact basin due to sunlight photocatalytic decay at peak sunlight hours was 6.6 and 4.7 mg/L for the two plants studied. The total chlorine loss due to sunlight was about 28% and 19% of the total chlorine chemical usage at the two plants. One plant had about 36 percent reduction of total chlorine usage after they covered both chlorine contact basins, which result in approximately 37,000/year savings on chemical purchase. Covering chlorine contact basins also led to more stable chlorine demand throughout the day and throughout the year regardless of the diurnal and seasonal sunlight intensity. Therefore, it offers more stable/accurate chlorine dosage and effluent residual control, and less effort from the plant operators. A mathematical model was developed to calculate the amount of UV-catalyzed chlorine decay. The parameters in the model were determined by calibrating the model to the field observed data. Then the model was employed to evaluate the average UV-catalyzed chlorine decay rate at various average chlorine concentration in the DCB, as well as estimated total chlorine loss due to sunlight at various flow rates.
Residual chlorine loss due to ultraviolet sunlight in the chlorine disinfection contact basins were investigated at two full-scale wastewater treatment plants. The investigation compared the chlorine loss in chlorine contact basins that were covered against the basins that were open to direct sunlight. Chlorine decay due to UV-catalyzed reaction was found to be significant. The average chlorine...
Author(s)
April Z. GuTroy MitchellTamara GreenJune LengPravit ParikhJB NeethlingMark Hammer
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 94: Management of Odors and VOCs/Disinfection: Think Outside the Box: What Is the Right Disinfectant?
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:7L.7776;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705783813403
Volume / Issue2005 / 7
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)7776 - 7793
Copyright2005
Word count245

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
April Z. Gu# Troy Mitchell# Tamara Green# June Leng# Pravit Parikh# JB Neethling# Mark Hammer. DISINFECTION CONTACT BASIN: COVER IT, OR NOT?. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 7 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-292579CITANCHOR>.
April Z. Gu# Troy Mitchell# Tamara Green# June Leng# Pravit Parikh# JB Neethling# Mark Hammer. DISINFECTION CONTACT BASIN: COVER IT, OR NOT?. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 7, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292579CITANCHOR.
April Z. Gu# Troy Mitchell# Tamara Green# June Leng# Pravit Parikh# JB Neethling# Mark Hammer
DISINFECTION CONTACT BASIN: COVER IT, OR NOT?
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 7, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292579CITANCHOR