lastID = -293925
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
DENITRIFICATION KINETICS USING EXTERNAL CARBON SOURCES: METHANOL, ETHANOL AND ACETATE
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 18:32:48 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 18:32:47 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 21:42:32 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:42:31 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:42:30 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
DENITRIFICATION KINETICS USING EXTERNAL CARBON SOURCES: METHANOL, ETHANOL AND ACETATE

DENITRIFICATION KINETICS USING EXTERNAL CARBON SOURCES: METHANOL, ETHANOL AND ACETATE

DENITRIFICATION KINETICS USING EXTERNAL CARBON SOURCES: METHANOL, ETHANOL AND ACETATE

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
DENITRIFICATION KINETICS USING EXTERNAL CARBON SOURCES: METHANOL, ETHANOL AND ACETATE
Abstract
External sources of organic carbon are often added to biological processes to facilitate denitrification and nitrogen removal by providing energy and carbon to heterotrophic bacteria. External carbon is needed especially in post-denitrification systems where wastewater carbon is not normally available. One of the factors in selecting an appropriate substrate source is that denitrification rates differ depending on the type of carbon added.The overall objectives of this research were two-fold: (1) to compare denitrification rates for organisms using different external carbon sources; and (2) to investigate acclimation of biomass to the various external carbon sources.Three lab-scale sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) were employed in the study, each with a different carbon substrate – methanol, ethanol or acetate. The units were seeded with sludge from a step feed biological nutrient removal (BNR) system that did not use any external carbon. The reactors were operated at 20°C and a solids retention time (SRT) of approximately 10 days with a cycle time of 6 hours. Each SBR cycle commenced with influent feeding (tap water spiked with nitrate), followed by a 2.25 hour aeration period. Aeration was then stopped and a 0.25 hour period ensured that dissolved oxygen (DO) decreased to zero before adding the carbon substrate. After a further 2 hour anoxic period, the SBRs were aerated for 0.25 hours before settling and decanting. The operating mode was selected to mimic the exposure of denitrifying biomass to alternating aerobic-anoxic conditions typically encountered in practice.Monitored parameters included pH, DO, temperature, nitrate, nitrite, chemical oxygen demand (COD), mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS), and mixed liquor volatile suspended solids (MLVSS). All parameters were measured according to Standard Methods (1998). Soluble nitrate, nitrite and COD were tested using the Hach DR4000 Spectrophotometer.During the first 2.25 hours (aerated) nitrate concentration remained essentially constant at a level determined by the influent concentration. Over 0.25 hours after aeration stopped (DO stripping) there was a small decrease in nitrate due to endogenous denitrification. After the carbon substrate was added at 2.5 hours, the nitrate showed a linear decrease over the remainder of the unaerated phase.Steady state was attained in the SBRs after approximately 40 days (4 SRTs). The in-situ specific denitrification rate (SDNR) was calculated at intervals of a few days from start up from the slope of the nitrate profile after substrate addition. The steady state in-situ SDNR values for methanol, ethanol and acetate were 24, 41 and 53 mgNO3-N/gVSS/hr, respectively.Once the systems had stabilized (after 3 to 4 SRTs) a series of ex-situ SDNR tests were performed using mixed liquor from each SBR with each of the three substrates (3 × 3 tests). A total of nine ex-situ SDNR experiments were performed using a matrix of the three different acclimated biomass and the three different substrates. As expected, each substrate produced the highest SDNR rate with biomass acclimated to that specific substrate. It is interesting to note that addition of acetate or ethanol to methanol-acclimated biomass exhibited very low SDNRs of 2.9 and 2.7 mgNO3-N/gVSS/hr, respectively. Use of ethanol with acetate acclimated biomass produced a high SDNR value of 27.2 mgNO3-N/gVSS/hr.High F/M tests are also being conducted to assess the maximum specific growth rates (μMAX) of organisms using the different substrates (Dold et al., 2005). The SBR profiles will be simulated using the BioWin process simulator to confirm the μMAX estimates obtained from the High F/M tests. Information from this study will be significant for systems practising external carbon addition for denitrification. The results to date demonstrate that biomass acclimated to acetate or ethanol exhibit high denitrification rates per unit VSS produced on the substrate (53 and 41 mgNO3-N/gVSS/hr) compared to the rate in the methanol-fed system (24 mgNO3-N/gVSS/hr).The results of the ex-situ tests are of particular interest for plants with methanol addition considering simultaneous addition of other substrates (at say low operating temperatures in an effort to improve denitrification performance). The methanol-acclimated sludge exhibits very little denitrification with addition of acetate or ethanol.
External sources of organic carbon are often added to biological processes to facilitate denitrification and nitrogen removal by providing energy and carbon to heterotrophic bacteria. External carbon is needed especially in post-denitrification systems where wastewater carbon is not normally available. One of the factors in selecting an appropriate substrate source is that denitrification rates...
Author(s)
Yalda MokhayeriSudhir MurthyRumana RiffatCharles BottPeter DoldImre Takacs
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 42: Biological Nutrient Removal
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2007
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20070101)2007:15L.3120;1-
DOI10.2175/193864707787973590
Volume / Issue2007 / 15
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)3120 - 3121
Copyright2007
Word count663

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'DENITRIFICATION KINETICS USING EXTERNAL CARBON SOURCES: METHANOL, ETHANOL AND ACETATE'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
DENITRIFICATION KINETICS USING EXTERNAL CARBON SOURCES: METHANOL, ETHANOL AND ACETATE
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-293925
Get access
-293925
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'DENITRIFICATION KINETICS USING EXTERNAL CARBON SOURCES: METHANOL, ETHANOL AND ACETATE'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
DENITRIFICATION KINETICS USING EXTERNAL CARBON SOURCES: METHANOL, ETHANOL AND ACETATE
Abstract
External sources of organic carbon are often added to biological processes to facilitate denitrification and nitrogen removal by providing energy and carbon to heterotrophic bacteria. External carbon is needed especially in post-denitrification systems where wastewater carbon is not normally available. One of the factors in selecting an appropriate substrate source is that denitrification rates differ depending on the type of carbon added.The overall objectives of this research were two-fold: (1) to compare denitrification rates for organisms using different external carbon sources; and (2) to investigate acclimation of biomass to the various external carbon sources.Three lab-scale sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) were employed in the study, each with a different carbon substrate – methanol, ethanol or acetate. The units were seeded with sludge from a step feed biological nutrient removal (BNR) system that did not use any external carbon. The reactors were operated at 20°C and a solids retention time (SRT) of approximately 10 days with a cycle time of 6 hours. Each SBR cycle commenced with influent feeding (tap water spiked with nitrate), followed by a 2.25 hour aeration period. Aeration was then stopped and a 0.25 hour period ensured that dissolved oxygen (DO) decreased to zero before adding the carbon substrate. After a further 2 hour anoxic period, the SBRs were aerated for 0.25 hours before settling and decanting. The operating mode was selected to mimic the exposure of denitrifying biomass to alternating aerobic-anoxic conditions typically encountered in practice.Monitored parameters included pH, DO, temperature, nitrate, nitrite, chemical oxygen demand (COD), mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS), and mixed liquor volatile suspended solids (MLVSS). All parameters were measured according to Standard Methods (1998). Soluble nitrate, nitrite and COD were tested using the Hach DR4000 Spectrophotometer.During the first 2.25 hours (aerated) nitrate concentration remained essentially constant at a level determined by the influent concentration. Over 0.25 hours after aeration stopped (DO stripping) there was a small decrease in nitrate due to endogenous denitrification. After the carbon substrate was added at 2.5 hours, the nitrate showed a linear decrease over the remainder of the unaerated phase.Steady state was attained in the SBRs after approximately 40 days (4 SRTs). The in-situ specific denitrification rate (SDNR) was calculated at intervals of a few days from start up from the slope of the nitrate profile after substrate addition. The steady state in-situ SDNR values for methanol, ethanol and acetate were 24, 41 and 53 mgNO3-N/gVSS/hr, respectively.Once the systems had stabilized (after 3 to 4 SRTs) a series of ex-situ SDNR tests were performed using mixed liquor from each SBR with each of the three substrates (3 × 3 tests). A total of nine ex-situ SDNR experiments were performed using a matrix of the three different acclimated biomass and the three different substrates. As expected, each substrate produced the highest SDNR rate with biomass acclimated to that specific substrate. It is interesting to note that addition of acetate or ethanol to methanol-acclimated biomass exhibited very low SDNRs of 2.9 and 2.7 mgNO3-N/gVSS/hr, respectively. Use of ethanol with acetate acclimated biomass produced a high SDNR value of 27.2 mgNO3-N/gVSS/hr.High F/M tests are also being conducted to assess the maximum specific growth rates (μMAX) of organisms using the different substrates (Dold et al., 2005). The SBR profiles will be simulated using the BioWin process simulator to confirm the μMAX estimates obtained from the High F/M tests. Information from this study will be significant for systems practising external carbon addition for denitrification. The results to date demonstrate that biomass acclimated to acetate or ethanol exhibit high denitrification rates per unit VSS produced on the substrate (53 and 41 mgNO3-N/gVSS/hr) compared to the rate in the methanol-fed system (24 mgNO3-N/gVSS/hr).The results of the ex-situ tests are of particular interest for plants with methanol addition considering simultaneous addition of other substrates (at say low operating temperatures in an effort to improve denitrification performance). The methanol-acclimated sludge exhibits very little denitrification with addition of acetate or ethanol.
External sources of organic carbon are often added to biological processes to facilitate denitrification and nitrogen removal by providing energy and carbon to heterotrophic bacteria. External carbon is needed especially in post-denitrification systems where wastewater carbon is not normally available. One of the factors in selecting an appropriate substrate source is that denitrification rates...
Author(s)
Yalda MokhayeriSudhir MurthyRumana RiffatCharles BottPeter DoldImre Takacs
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 42: Biological Nutrient Removal
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2007
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20070101)2007:15L.3120;1-
DOI10.2175/193864707787973590
Volume / Issue2007 / 15
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)3120 - 3121
Copyright2007
Word count663

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Yalda Mokhayeri# Sudhir Murthy# Rumana Riffat# Charles Bott# Peter Dold# Imre Takacs. DENITRIFICATION KINETICS USING EXTERNAL CARBON SOURCES: METHANOL, ETHANOL AND ACETATE. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 11 Oct. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-293925CITANCHOR>.
Yalda Mokhayeri# Sudhir Murthy# Rumana Riffat# Charles Bott# Peter Dold# Imre Takacs. DENITRIFICATION KINETICS USING EXTERNAL CARBON SOURCES: METHANOL, ETHANOL AND ACETATE. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed October 11, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-293925CITANCHOR.
Yalda Mokhayeri# Sudhir Murthy# Rumana Riffat# Charles Bott# Peter Dold# Imre Takacs
DENITRIFICATION KINETICS USING EXTERNAL CARBON SOURCES: METHANOL, ETHANOL AND ACETATE
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
October 11, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-293925CITANCHOR