lastID = -293948
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Why Are MBRs Commonly Designed To Nitrify? Because Changes in Organic Foulant Properties Impact Membrane Fouling
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-02-01 07:02:34 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 07:02:33 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 07:02:32 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Why Are MBRs Commonly Designed To Nitrify? Because Changes in Organic Foulant Properties Impact Membrane Fouling

Why Are MBRs Commonly Designed To Nitrify? Because Changes in Organic Foulant Properties Impact Membrane Fouling

Why Are MBRs Commonly Designed To Nitrify? Because Changes in Organic Foulant Properties Impact Membrane Fouling

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Why Are MBRs Commonly Designed To Nitrify? Because Changes in Organic Foulant Properties Impact Membrane Fouling
Abstract
A submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) was operated at a non-nitrifying solids retention time (SRT) condition (2 d) and a nitrifying SRT condition (10 d) to determine the impact of nitrification on mixed liquor properties and membrane fouling. At each SRT condition, the SMBR was operated with a mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) concentration of approximately 1.2 g/L, a membrane flux of 17 L/m2h, and a coarse bubble aeration rate of approximately 0.4 L/s. Membrane fouling rates were determined for the steady state conditions and the mixed liquor properties were quantified for the protein and carbohydrate content determined in the soluble fraction (soluble microbial products or SMP) and attached to the biological flocs (extracellular polymeric substances or EPS). The mixed liquor and its components (e.g. soluble fraction and suspended solids fraction) were analyzed for their resistance to filtration, which was expressed as a modified fouling index or MFI, using a deadend filtration apparatus. Molecular weights of the influent organics, SMP, EPS, and SMBR effluent were measured using a parallel membrane fractionation method. The molecular weights were measured as protein and carbohydrate concentrations using membranes with nominal molecular weight cutoffs of 10 kDa and 1 kDa. The membrane was investigated using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) to attain a fingerprint of the organic foulants relative to the clean membrane. The results showed increased concentrations of high molecular weight molecules at the 2-d SRT than at the 10-d SRT. Additionally, the results showed that the filtration resistance of both the soluble and the solids portions of the mixed liquor increased in resistance as the SRT was reduced from 10-d to 2-d. The increased mixed liquor filtration resistance at the 2-d SRT resulted in an observed loss of membrane permeability that was not due to a fouled membrane. Finally, the FTIR results indicated the presence of protein on the fouled membranes from both conditions. However, the fouled membrane from the 2-d SRT exhibited strong peaks for carbohydrates as well while the fouled membrane from the 10-d SRT did not. This is consistent with the fact that the carbohydrate was mostly low molecular weight (
A submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) was operated at a non-nitrifying solids retention time (SRT) condition (2 d) and a nitrifying SRT condition (10 d) to determine the impact of nitrification on mixed liquor properties and membrane fouling. At each SRT condition, the SMBR was operated with a mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) concentration of approximately 1.2 g/L, a membrane flux of 17...
Author(s)
R. Shane TrussellNamjung JangRion P. MerloIn S. KimSlawomir W. HermanowiczDavid Jenkins
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 46: MBR
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2007
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20070101)2007:15L.3378;1-
DOI10.2175/193864707787973680
Volume / Issue2007 / 15
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)3378 - 3392
Copyright2007
Word count366

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Why Are MBRs Commonly Designed To Nitrify? Because Changes in Organic Foulant Properties Impact Membrane Fouling'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Why Are MBRs Commonly Designed To Nitrify? Because Changes in Organic Foulant Properties Impact Membrane Fouling
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-293948
Get access
-293948
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Why Are MBRs Commonly Designed To Nitrify? Because Changes in Organic Foulant Properties Impact Membrane Fouling'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Why Are MBRs Commonly Designed To Nitrify? Because Changes in Organic Foulant Properties Impact Membrane Fouling
Abstract
A submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) was operated at a non-nitrifying solids retention time (SRT) condition (2 d) and a nitrifying SRT condition (10 d) to determine the impact of nitrification on mixed liquor properties and membrane fouling. At each SRT condition, the SMBR was operated with a mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) concentration of approximately 1.2 g/L, a membrane flux of 17 L/m2h, and a coarse bubble aeration rate of approximately 0.4 L/s. Membrane fouling rates were determined for the steady state conditions and the mixed liquor properties were quantified for the protein and carbohydrate content determined in the soluble fraction (soluble microbial products or SMP) and attached to the biological flocs (extracellular polymeric substances or EPS). The mixed liquor and its components (e.g. soluble fraction and suspended solids fraction) were analyzed for their resistance to filtration, which was expressed as a modified fouling index or MFI, using a deadend filtration apparatus. Molecular weights of the influent organics, SMP, EPS, and SMBR effluent were measured using a parallel membrane fractionation method. The molecular weights were measured as protein and carbohydrate concentrations using membranes with nominal molecular weight cutoffs of 10 kDa and 1 kDa. The membrane was investigated using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) to attain a fingerprint of the organic foulants relative to the clean membrane. The results showed increased concentrations of high molecular weight molecules at the 2-d SRT than at the 10-d SRT. Additionally, the results showed that the filtration resistance of both the soluble and the solids portions of the mixed liquor increased in resistance as the SRT was reduced from 10-d to 2-d. The increased mixed liquor filtration resistance at the 2-d SRT resulted in an observed loss of membrane permeability that was not due to a fouled membrane. Finally, the FTIR results indicated the presence of protein on the fouled membranes from both conditions. However, the fouled membrane from the 2-d SRT exhibited strong peaks for carbohydrates as well while the fouled membrane from the 10-d SRT did not. This is consistent with the fact that the carbohydrate was mostly low molecular weight (
A submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) was operated at a non-nitrifying solids retention time (SRT) condition (2 d) and a nitrifying SRT condition (10 d) to determine the impact of nitrification on mixed liquor properties and membrane fouling. At each SRT condition, the SMBR was operated with a mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) concentration of approximately 1.2 g/L, a membrane flux of 17...
Author(s)
R. Shane TrussellNamjung JangRion P. MerloIn S. KimSlawomir W. HermanowiczDavid Jenkins
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 46: MBR
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2007
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20070101)2007:15L.3378;1-
DOI10.2175/193864707787973680
Volume / Issue2007 / 15
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)3378 - 3392
Copyright2007
Word count366

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
R. Shane Trussell# Namjung Jang# Rion P. Merlo# In S. Kim# Slawomir W. Hermanowicz# David Jenkins. Why Are MBRs Commonly Designed To Nitrify? Because Changes in Organic Foulant Properties Impact Membrane Fouling. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 4 Jul. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-293948CITANCHOR>.
R. Shane Trussell# Namjung Jang# Rion P. Merlo# In S. Kim# Slawomir W. Hermanowicz# David Jenkins. Why Are MBRs Commonly Designed To Nitrify? Because Changes in Organic Foulant Properties Impact Membrane Fouling. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed July 4, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-293948CITANCHOR.
R. Shane Trussell# Namjung Jang# Rion P. Merlo# In S. Kim# Slawomir W. Hermanowicz# David Jenkins
Why Are MBRs Commonly Designed To Nitrify? Because Changes in Organic Foulant Properties Impact Membrane Fouling
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
July 4, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-293948CITANCHOR