lastID = -294338
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
COMPARISON OF A2O AND UCT OPERATION MODE AT FULL-SCALE EBPR PROCESSES – PERFORMANCE, KINETICS AND PAO POPULATION
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 13:31:19 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 13:31:18 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-26 23:38:02 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 21:11:14 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:11:13 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
COMPARISON OF A2O AND UCT OPERATION MODE AT FULL-SCALE EBPR PROCESSES – PERFORMANCE, KINETICS AND PAO POPULATION

COMPARISON OF A2O AND UCT OPERATION MODE AT FULL-SCALE EBPR PROCESSES – PERFORMANCE, KINETICS AND PAO POPULATION

COMPARISON OF A2O AND UCT OPERATION MODE AT FULL-SCALE EBPR PROCESSES – PERFORMANCE, KINETICS AND PAO POPULATION

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
COMPARISON OF A2O AND UCT OPERATION MODE AT FULL-SCALE EBPR PROCESSES – PERFORMANCE, KINETICS AND PAO POPULATION
Abstract
Comparison of the P removal performance with UCT mode versus A2O was conducted at a full-scale enhanced biological phosphorus (P) removal (EBPR) plant. The plant has four treatment trains in parallel that allowed for simultaneous operation of different modes. The UCT mode produced lower effluent ortho-phosphate concentration and had better P removal performance than the A2O mode. Investigation of ortho-P and TON (NO2+NO3) profiles across different anaerobic, anoxic and aerobic zones in the two processes indicated that UCT mode had higher and quicker P release peak than A2O mode and there were much more and faster anoxic P-uptake took place in the UCT mode than A2O mode. This led to better denitrification and lower effluent nitrate concentration in UCT process than A2O process. Batch tests with sludge samples from the UCT process mode showed higher specific phosphorus removal rates and VFA utilization efficiency than that from the A2O process, indicating higher PAO activity level in the UCT system. Quantification of poly-phosphate accumulating organisms (PAOs) in the two processes using DAPI stain and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) showed similar level of total PAOs in the two processes and, Rhodocyclus-like PAOs in UCT process was found to be slightly higher than A2O (11.6% and 9.9%, respectively). These results showed consistent evidence for better P removal performance in UCT mode than A2O mode, although, there was no apparent quantitative correlation between population abundance, P release and uptake rates and effluent ortho-P concentration. This study suggests that there is advantage to apply UCT mode, especially when the effluent P limit becomes very low and the small extent of difference in effluent P concentration starts to become more significant.
Comparison of the P removal performance with UCT mode versus A2O was conducted at a full-scale enhanced biological phosphorus (P) removal (EBPR) plant. The plant has four treatment trains in parallel that allowed for simultaneous operation of different modes. The UCT mode produced lower effluent ortho-phosphate concentration and had better P removal performance than the A2O mode. Investigation of...
Author(s)
April Z. GuS. HeK. D. McMahonJB Neething
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 10: Biological Phosphorus Removal Operations
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2007
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20070101)2007:2L.953;1-
DOI10.2175/193864707787977352
Volume / Issue2007 / 2
Content sourceNutrient Removal and Recovery Symposium
First / last page(s)953 - 967
Copyright2007
Word count291

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'COMPARISON OF A2O AND UCT OPERATION MODE AT FULL-SCALE EBPR PROCESSES – PERFORMANCE, KINETICS AND PAO POPULATION'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
COMPARISON OF A2O AND UCT OPERATION MODE AT FULL-SCALE EBPR PROCESSES – PERFORMANCE, KINETICS AND PAO POPULATION
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-294338
Get access
-294338
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'COMPARISON OF A2O AND UCT OPERATION MODE AT FULL-SCALE EBPR PROCESSES – PERFORMANCE, KINETICS AND PAO POPULATION'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
COMPARISON OF A2O AND UCT OPERATION MODE AT FULL-SCALE EBPR PROCESSES – PERFORMANCE, KINETICS AND PAO POPULATION
Abstract
Comparison of the P removal performance with UCT mode versus A2O was conducted at a full-scale enhanced biological phosphorus (P) removal (EBPR) plant. The plant has four treatment trains in parallel that allowed for simultaneous operation of different modes. The UCT mode produced lower effluent ortho-phosphate concentration and had better P removal performance than the A2O mode. Investigation of ortho-P and TON (NO2+NO3) profiles across different anaerobic, anoxic and aerobic zones in the two processes indicated that UCT mode had higher and quicker P release peak than A2O mode and there were much more and faster anoxic P-uptake took place in the UCT mode than A2O mode. This led to better denitrification and lower effluent nitrate concentration in UCT process than A2O process. Batch tests with sludge samples from the UCT process mode showed higher specific phosphorus removal rates and VFA utilization efficiency than that from the A2O process, indicating higher PAO activity level in the UCT system. Quantification of poly-phosphate accumulating organisms (PAOs) in the two processes using DAPI stain and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) showed similar level of total PAOs in the two processes and, Rhodocyclus-like PAOs in UCT process was found to be slightly higher than A2O (11.6% and 9.9%, respectively). These results showed consistent evidence for better P removal performance in UCT mode than A2O mode, although, there was no apparent quantitative correlation between population abundance, P release and uptake rates and effluent ortho-P concentration. This study suggests that there is advantage to apply UCT mode, especially when the effluent P limit becomes very low and the small extent of difference in effluent P concentration starts to become more significant.
Comparison of the P removal performance with UCT mode versus A2O was conducted at a full-scale enhanced biological phosphorus (P) removal (EBPR) plant. The plant has four treatment trains in parallel that allowed for simultaneous operation of different modes. The UCT mode produced lower effluent ortho-phosphate concentration and had better P removal performance than the A2O mode. Investigation of...
Author(s)
April Z. GuS. HeK. D. McMahonJB Neething
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 10: Biological Phosphorus Removal Operations
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2007
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20070101)2007:2L.953;1-
DOI10.2175/193864707787977352
Volume / Issue2007 / 2
Content sourceNutrient Removal and Recovery Symposium
First / last page(s)953 - 967
Copyright2007
Word count291

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
April Z. Gu# S. He# K. D. McMahon# JB Neething. COMPARISON OF A2O AND UCT OPERATION MODE AT FULL-SCALE EBPR PROCESSES – PERFORMANCE, KINETICS AND PAO POPULATION. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 2 Oct. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-294338CITANCHOR>.
April Z. Gu# S. He# K. D. McMahon# JB Neething. COMPARISON OF A2O AND UCT OPERATION MODE AT FULL-SCALE EBPR PROCESSES – PERFORMANCE, KINETICS AND PAO POPULATION. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed October 2, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-294338CITANCHOR.
April Z. Gu# S. He# K. D. McMahon# JB Neething
COMPARISON OF A2O AND UCT OPERATION MODE AT FULL-SCALE EBPR PROCESSES – PERFORMANCE, KINETICS AND PAO POPULATION
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
October 2, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-294338CITANCHOR