lastID = -295405
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Driving Decisions to Closure on Projects with Multiple Competing Priorities
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 20:05:43 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-06 20:05:42 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 02:10:31 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 02:10:30 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 22:11:50 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 22:11:49 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Driving Decisions to Closure on Projects with Multiple Competing Priorities

Driving Decisions to Closure on Projects with Multiple Competing Priorities

Driving Decisions to Closure on Projects with Multiple Competing Priorities

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Driving Decisions to Closure on Projects with Multiple Competing Priorities
Abstract
In recent years, the level of complexity on many water projects has dramatically increased due to a number of factors such as regionalization, regulations, budget and resource constraints, environmental and community concerns, and evolution of information technology. These factors often represent competing priorities and place decision-makers in the challenging position of mapping out a course of action that satisfies these competing priorities while sometimes dealing with hundreds of objectives and alternatives. In these situations, decision-makers are increasingly employing transparent and open processes involving a compilation of information and work sessions with stakeholders. Critical to the success of this process is the technique used to communicate the information to the participants and generate priorities for evaluating alternatives.To drive decisions to closure on several complex water programs involving integration of technical, financial, envirionmental, community outreach, and mangement/organzational elements, O'Brien & Gere has applied a decision support system (DSS). This system engages decision-makers in a step-wise process for breaking down a complex problem into a series of smaller components proceeding from goals to criteria to actions. By applying simple pairwise comparisons, decision-makers make a series of simple judgements (subjective and objective) to arrive at the overall priorities for the alternatives.This process can be used to address risk and uncertainty, identify likely outcomes, facilitate group decision-making, and select alternatives. This presentation will include a discussion of the challenges and insights associated with effective application of this technique for several case studies:17 water utilities in central Kentucky which conducted a study to develop a regional potable water supply and system (drinking water regulations, 40 water supply alternatives, financial issues associated with water sales, new organization to oversee management and operation of the proposed regional waterworks facilities, interactive workshops and critical decision-making with the public and agencies personnel present).Water utility in New York addressing regulatory compliance with Stage 2 Rule for covering of three open finished water reservoirs (drinking water regulations, 125 alternatives, financial considerations, regional agreements, historic preservation and community impacts, and reliability).Water utility in New York considering replacement of water treatment plant versus purchase of wholesale water (environmental, governance/control, financial, raw and finished water quality, permitting, and public acceptance).
In recent years, the level of complexity on many water projects has dramatically increased due to a number of factors such as regionalization, regulations, budget and resource constraints, environmental and community concerns, and evolution of information technology. These factors often represent competing priorities and place decision-makers in the challenging position of mapping out a course of...
Author(s)
Thomas E. Dumm
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 2: Creating Your Path Forward
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2008
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20080101)2008:2L.2;1-
DOI10.2175/193864708788805567
Volume / Issue2008 / 2
Content sourceUtility Management Conference
First / last page(s)2 - 5
Copyright2008
Word count368

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Driving Decisions to Closure on Projects with Multiple Competing Priorities'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Driving Decisions to Closure on Projects with Multiple Competing Priorities
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-295405
Get access
-295405
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Driving Decisions to Closure on Projects with Multiple Competing Priorities'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Driving Decisions to Closure on Projects with Multiple Competing Priorities
Abstract
In recent years, the level of complexity on many water projects has dramatically increased due to a number of factors such as regionalization, regulations, budget and resource constraints, environmental and community concerns, and evolution of information technology. These factors often represent competing priorities and place decision-makers in the challenging position of mapping out a course of action that satisfies these competing priorities while sometimes dealing with hundreds of objectives and alternatives. In these situations, decision-makers are increasingly employing transparent and open processes involving a compilation of information and work sessions with stakeholders. Critical to the success of this process is the technique used to communicate the information to the participants and generate priorities for evaluating alternatives.To drive decisions to closure on several complex water programs involving integration of technical, financial, envirionmental, community outreach, and mangement/organzational elements, O'Brien & Gere has applied a decision support system (DSS). This system engages decision-makers in a step-wise process for breaking down a complex problem into a series of smaller components proceeding from goals to criteria to actions. By applying simple pairwise comparisons, decision-makers make a series of simple judgements (subjective and objective) to arrive at the overall priorities for the alternatives.This process can be used to address risk and uncertainty, identify likely outcomes, facilitate group decision-making, and select alternatives. This presentation will include a discussion of the challenges and insights associated with effective application of this technique for several case studies:17 water utilities in central Kentucky which conducted a study to develop a regional potable water supply and system (drinking water regulations, 40 water supply alternatives, financial issues associated with water sales, new organization to oversee management and operation of the proposed regional waterworks facilities, interactive workshops and critical decision-making with the public and agencies personnel present).Water utility in New York addressing regulatory compliance with Stage 2 Rule for covering of three open finished water reservoirs (drinking water regulations, 125 alternatives, financial considerations, regional agreements, historic preservation and community impacts, and reliability).Water utility in New York considering replacement of water treatment plant versus purchase of wholesale water (environmental, governance/control, financial, raw and finished water quality, permitting, and public acceptance).
In recent years, the level of complexity on many water projects has dramatically increased due to a number of factors such as regionalization, regulations, budget and resource constraints, environmental and community concerns, and evolution of information technology. These factors often represent competing priorities and place decision-makers in the challenging position of mapping out a course of...
Author(s)
Thomas E. Dumm
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 2: Creating Your Path Forward
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2008
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20080101)2008:2L.2;1-
DOI10.2175/193864708788805567
Volume / Issue2008 / 2
Content sourceUtility Management Conference
First / last page(s)2 - 5
Copyright2008
Word count368

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Thomas E. Dumm. Driving Decisions to Closure on Projects with Multiple Competing Priorities. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 28 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-295405CITANCHOR>.
Thomas E. Dumm. Driving Decisions to Closure on Projects with Multiple Competing Priorities. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 28, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-295405CITANCHOR.
Thomas E. Dumm
Driving Decisions to Closure on Projects with Multiple Competing Priorities
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 28, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-295405CITANCHOR