lastID = -295679
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Maximizing Flow to the ALCOSAN Woods Run Plant
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 21:32:21 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-26 22:09:00 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-26 22:08:59 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 01:19:42 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 01:19:41 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Maximizing Flow to the ALCOSAN Woods Run Plant

Maximizing Flow to the ALCOSAN Woods Run Plant

Maximizing Flow to the ALCOSAN Woods Run Plant

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Maximizing Flow to the ALCOSAN Woods Run Plant
Abstract
The Allegheny County Sanitary Authority provides wastewater conveyance and treatment for 83 communities in southwestern Pennsylvania, including Pittsburgh. Treatment is provided at its Woods Run facility, which is a conventional activated sludge facility with a rated capacity of 250 mgd. Influent tunnel capacity to the Woods Run plant is estimated to be approximately 1,000 mgd. As part of a 1997 plan to maximize flows to the treatment plant during wet weather to reduce the discharge of sewage to the rivers and streams, ALCOSAN proposed that preliminary treatment capacity be expanded to 875 mgd, primary treatment capacity be expanded to 600 mgd, and secondary treatment capacity be expanded to 275 mgd. ALCOSAN further proposed that full secondary treatment be provided for flows up to 275 mgd, while conventional bypass be used for flows between 275 and 600 mgd and a “split-flow” bypass be used for flows between 600 and 875 mgd. The “split-flow” bypass would involve secondary treatment of 275 mgd of headworks flow and primary treatment of the remaining headworks flow (325 to 600 mgd), with the primary effluent and secondary effluent being combined after disinfection and then discharged. These bypass scenarios were proposed in response to space limitations on the plant site that make it unfeasible to expand the conventional secondary treatment process. The Woods Run plant currently does not bypass during wet weather and wastewater flow entering the plant is limited via the influent pumping station to the secondary treatment capacity. It is anticipated that the proposed wet weather bypass meets the guidelines of the EPA's Combined Sewer Overflow Policy The expansion of the Woods Run plant wet weather capacity to 875 mgd is expected to provide 65 percent capture of combined sewer overflows.Because there were no known large treatment plants using a split-flow approach to wet weather treatment, pilot testing was performed from February through May 2005 and again from January through April 2006 to determine whether the existing secondary treatment system could adequately treat primary influent. In addition, full-scale testing of primary settling was conducted between April and October 5, 2005 and again between November 2005 and August 2006 to determine the capacity of the primary sedimentation tanks at projected wet weather wet flow conditions. The pilot study results suggest that the plant's existing activated sludge process, operating under steady state conditions and at normal mixed liquor concentrations of 1,500 to 2,000 mg/L range and solid retention times of two to four days, would be adequate for achieving effluent requirements during wet weather flows. Further, the pilot testing demonstrated adequate reduction of biodegradable material during non-steady-state wet weather conditions, over the limited number of low-intensity wet weather events that occurred during the pilot testing. The results of the full-scale primary testing support the concept of using the primary sedimentation tanks for wet weather treatment at flows up to the hydraulic capacity of each process unit (60 mgd/tank or 480 mgd firm capacity overall).
The Allegheny County Sanitary Authority provides wastewater conveyance and treatment for 83 communities in southwestern Pennsylvania, including Pittsburgh. Treatment is provided at its Woods Run facility, which is a conventional activated sludge facility with a rated capacity of 250 mgd. Influent tunnel capacity to the Woods Run plant is estimated to be approximately 1,000 mgd. As part of a 1997...
Author(s)
Anna S. MehrotraJohn D. RattrayScott L. CowburnDavid W. Borneman
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 10: The Next Step of CSO Management
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2008
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20080101)2008:5L.766;1-
DOI10.2175/193864708788812767
Volume / Issue2008 / 5
Content sourceCollection Systems Conference
First / last page(s)766 - 789
Copyright2008
Word count496

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Maximizing Flow to the ALCOSAN Woods Run Plant'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Maximizing Flow to the ALCOSAN Woods Run Plant
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-295679
Get access
-295679
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Maximizing Flow to the ALCOSAN Woods Run Plant'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Maximizing Flow to the ALCOSAN Woods Run Plant
Abstract
The Allegheny County Sanitary Authority provides wastewater conveyance and treatment for 83 communities in southwestern Pennsylvania, including Pittsburgh. Treatment is provided at its Woods Run facility, which is a conventional activated sludge facility with a rated capacity of 250 mgd. Influent tunnel capacity to the Woods Run plant is estimated to be approximately 1,000 mgd. As part of a 1997 plan to maximize flows to the treatment plant during wet weather to reduce the discharge of sewage to the rivers and streams, ALCOSAN proposed that preliminary treatment capacity be expanded to 875 mgd, primary treatment capacity be expanded to 600 mgd, and secondary treatment capacity be expanded to 275 mgd. ALCOSAN further proposed that full secondary treatment be provided for flows up to 275 mgd, while conventional bypass be used for flows between 275 and 600 mgd and a “split-flow” bypass be used for flows between 600 and 875 mgd. The “split-flow” bypass would involve secondary treatment of 275 mgd of headworks flow and primary treatment of the remaining headworks flow (325 to 600 mgd), with the primary effluent and secondary effluent being combined after disinfection and then discharged. These bypass scenarios were proposed in response to space limitations on the plant site that make it unfeasible to expand the conventional secondary treatment process. The Woods Run plant currently does not bypass during wet weather and wastewater flow entering the plant is limited via the influent pumping station to the secondary treatment capacity. It is anticipated that the proposed wet weather bypass meets the guidelines of the EPA's Combined Sewer Overflow Policy The expansion of the Woods Run plant wet weather capacity to 875 mgd is expected to provide 65 percent capture of combined sewer overflows.Because there were no known large treatment plants using a split-flow approach to wet weather treatment, pilot testing was performed from February through May 2005 and again from January through April 2006 to determine whether the existing secondary treatment system could adequately treat primary influent. In addition, full-scale testing of primary settling was conducted between April and October 5, 2005 and again between November 2005 and August 2006 to determine the capacity of the primary sedimentation tanks at projected wet weather wet flow conditions. The pilot study results suggest that the plant's existing activated sludge process, operating under steady state conditions and at normal mixed liquor concentrations of 1,500 to 2,000 mg/L range and solid retention times of two to four days, would be adequate for achieving effluent requirements during wet weather flows. Further, the pilot testing demonstrated adequate reduction of biodegradable material during non-steady-state wet weather conditions, over the limited number of low-intensity wet weather events that occurred during the pilot testing. The results of the full-scale primary testing support the concept of using the primary sedimentation tanks for wet weather treatment at flows up to the hydraulic capacity of each process unit (60 mgd/tank or 480 mgd firm capacity overall).
The Allegheny County Sanitary Authority provides wastewater conveyance and treatment for 83 communities in southwestern Pennsylvania, including Pittsburgh. Treatment is provided at its Woods Run facility, which is a conventional activated sludge facility with a rated capacity of 250 mgd. Influent tunnel capacity to the Woods Run plant is estimated to be approximately 1,000 mgd. As part of a 1997...
Author(s)
Anna S. MehrotraJohn D. RattrayScott L. CowburnDavid W. Borneman
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 10: The Next Step of CSO Management
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2008
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20080101)2008:5L.766;1-
DOI10.2175/193864708788812767
Volume / Issue2008 / 5
Content sourceCollection Systems Conference
First / last page(s)766 - 789
Copyright2008
Word count496

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Anna S. Mehrotra# John D. Rattray# Scott L. Cowburn# David W. Borneman. Maximizing Flow to the ALCOSAN Woods Run Plant. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 4 Jul. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-295679CITANCHOR>.
Anna S. Mehrotra# John D. Rattray# Scott L. Cowburn# David W. Borneman. Maximizing Flow to the ALCOSAN Woods Run Plant. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed July 4, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-295679CITANCHOR.
Anna S. Mehrotra# John D. Rattray# Scott L. Cowburn# David W. Borneman
Maximizing Flow to the ALCOSAN Woods Run Plant
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
July 4, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-295679CITANCHOR